Accuracy of Low-Cost, Smartphone-Based Retinal Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-08-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S416422
Mohammad Eko Prayogo, Alfia Fatma Zaharo, Novandriati Nur Rizky Damayanti, Felicia Widyaputri, Jarir At Thobari, Vina Yanti Susanti, Muhammad Bayu Sasongko
{"title":"Accuracy of Low-Cost, Smartphone-Based Retinal Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Mohammad Eko Prayogo, Alfia Fatma Zaharo, Novandriati Nur Rizky Damayanti, Felicia Widyaputri, Jarir At Thobari, Vina Yanti Susanti, Muhammad Bayu Sasongko","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S416422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. Early DR screening is essential, but the infrastructure can be less affordable in low resource countries. This study aims to review the accuracy of low-cost smartphone-based fundus cameras for DR screening in adult patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search to find studies that reported the sensitivity and specificity of low-cost smartphone-based devices for fundus photography in adult patients with diabetes. We searched three databases (MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus) and one register (Cochrane CENTRAL). We presented the accuracy values by grouping the diagnosis into three: any DR, referrable DR, and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Risk of bias and applicability of the studies were assessed using QUADAS-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five out of 294 retrieved records were included with a total of six smartphone-based devices reviewed. All of the reference diagnostic methods used in the included studies were either indirect ophthalmoscopy or slit-lamp examinations and all smartphone-based devices' imaging protocols used mydriatic drops. The reported sensitivity and specificity for any DR were 52-92.2% and 73.3-99%; for referral DR were 21-91.4% and 64.9-100%; and for DMO were 29.4-81% and 95-100%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sensitivity available low-cost smartphone-based devices for DR screening were acceptable and their specificity particularly for detecting referrable DR and DMO were considerably good. These findings support their potential utilization for DR screening in a low resources setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"2459-2470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/40/opth-17-2459.PMC10443682.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S416422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness. Early DR screening is essential, but the infrastructure can be less affordable in low resource countries. This study aims to review the accuracy of low-cost smartphone-based fundus cameras for DR screening in adult patients with diabetes.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search to find studies that reported the sensitivity and specificity of low-cost smartphone-based devices for fundus photography in adult patients with diabetes. We searched three databases (MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus) and one register (Cochrane CENTRAL). We presented the accuracy values by grouping the diagnosis into three: any DR, referrable DR, and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Risk of bias and applicability of the studies were assessed using QUADAS-2.

Results: Five out of 294 retrieved records were included with a total of six smartphone-based devices reviewed. All of the reference diagnostic methods used in the included studies were either indirect ophthalmoscopy or slit-lamp examinations and all smartphone-based devices' imaging protocols used mydriatic drops. The reported sensitivity and specificity for any DR were 52-92.2% and 73.3-99%; for referral DR were 21-91.4% and 64.9-100%; and for DMO were 29.4-81% and 95-100%, respectively.

Conclusion: Sensitivity available low-cost smartphone-based devices for DR screening were acceptable and their specificity particularly for detecting referrable DR and DMO were considerably good. These findings support their potential utilization for DR screening in a low resources setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于智能手机的低成本视网膜摄影在糖尿病视网膜病变筛查中的准确性:系统回顾
目的:糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是导致失明的主要原因。早期糖尿病视网膜病变筛查至关重要,但在资源匮乏的国家,基础设施的负担能力可能较低。本研究旨在回顾基于低成本智能手机的眼底照相机对成年糖尿病患者进行糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的准确性:我们进行了系统的文献检索,以找到报道基于低成本智能手机的眼底照相设备在成年糖尿病患者中的灵敏度和特异性的研究。我们检索了三个数据库(MEDLINE、Google Scholar、Scopus)和一个登记册(Cochrane CENTRAL)。我们将诊断分为三类:任何DR、可转诊DR和糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DMO),并给出了准确率值。我们使用 QUADAS-2 评估了研究的偏倚风险和适用性:结果:在检索到的 294 份记录中,有 5 份被纳入,共审查了 6 种基于智能手机的设备。所有纳入研究的参考诊断方法均为间接眼底镜检查或裂隙灯检查,所有基于智能手机的设备的成像方案均使用了催眠滴眼液。报告显示,任何DR的敏感性和特异性分别为52-92.2%和73.3-99%;转诊DR的敏感性和特异性分别为21-91.4%和64.9-100%;DMO的敏感性和特异性分别为29.4-81%和95-100%:可用于 DR 筛查的低成本智能手机设备的灵敏度可以接受,其特异性,尤其是检测可转诊 DR 和 DMO 的特异性相当好。这些研究结果支持在资源匮乏的环境中使用智能手机筛查 DR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信