A new tool to assess the occurrence of personality traits: the Phenomenological Personality Factor questionnaire.

IF 0.9 4区医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY

Rivista di psichiatria Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1708/3922.39075

Natascia De Lucia, Mauro Nelson Maldonato, Valeria Cioffi, Lucia Luciana Mosca, Elena Gigante, Nicole Nascivera, Enrico Moretto, Benedetta Muzii, Mario Bottone, Daniela Cantone, Raffaele Sperandeo

{"title":"A new tool to assess the occurrence of personality traits: the Phenomenological Personality Factor questionnaire.","authors":"Natascia De Lucia, Mauro Nelson Maldonato, Valeria Cioffi, Lucia Luciana Mosca, Elena Gigante, Nicole Nascivera, Enrico Moretto, Benedetta Muzii, Mario Bottone, Daniela Cantone, Raffaele Sperandeo","doi":"10.1708/3922.39075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Personality traits are patterns of thoughts, feelings and actions that are usually assessed by means of psychometric questionnaires. In the present study we described the Phenomenological Personality Factor (PPF), a short questionnaire assessing the personality traits, taking into account the different interpretative models of personality.Methods: A sample of 554 healthy subjects (357 female; 197 males) aged 18-60 years were enrolled. Each participant was required to complete PPF, by indicating the presence/absence of the individual personality trait, and the Italian version of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scale (ANPS).Results: The principal component analysis showed that seven factors explained the 35.07% of the total variance. Moreover, the correlation analysis revealed that the PPF components were significantly and positively associated with the ANPS scales.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the PPF is a useful questionnaire to assess the personality traits, and the adaptive functioning, in healthy individuals.","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":"57 6","pages":"291-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/3922.39075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personality traits are patterns of thoughts, feelings and actions that are usually assessed by means of psychometric questionnaires. In the present study we described the Phenomenological Personality Factor (PPF), a short questionnaire assessing the personality traits, taking into account the different interpretative models of personality.

Methods: A sample of 554 healthy subjects (357 female; 197 males) aged 18-60 years were enrolled. Each participant was required to complete PPF, by indicating the presence/absence of the individual personality trait, and the Italian version of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scale (ANPS).

Results: The principal component analysis showed that seven factors explained the 35.07% of the total variance. Moreover, the correlation analysis revealed that the PPF components were significantly and positively associated with the ANPS scales.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the PPF is a useful questionnaire to assess the personality traits, and the adaptive functioning, in healthy individuals.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一种评估人格特质发生的新工具:现象学人格因素问卷。

背景:人格特征是思想、感觉和行为的模式，通常通过心理测量问卷来评估。在本研究中，我们描述了现象学人格因素(PPF)，一个评估人格特征的简短问卷，考虑到不同的人格解释模型。方法:健康受试者554例(女性357例;197名男性，年龄18-60岁。每个参与者都被要求完成PPF，通过指出个人人格特征的存在/不存在，以及意大利版的情感神经科学人格量表(ANPS)。结果:主成分分析显示，7个因素解释了总方差的35.07%。此外，相关分析显示PPF成分与ANPS量表呈显著正相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明，PPF是一份评估健康个体人格特征和适应功能的有用问卷。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Rivista di psichiatria 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

3.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.