Talita Jordânia Rocha do Rêgo, José Vitor Mota Lemos, Amanda Pinheiro Leitão Matos, Caio Ferreira Freire Caetano, Thinali Sousa Dantas, Fabrício Bitu Sousa, Edgar Marçal de Barros Filho, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva
{"title":"Development and professional validation of an App to support Oral Cancer Screening.","authors":"Talita Jordânia Rocha do Rêgo, José Vitor Mota Lemos, Amanda Pinheiro Leitão Matos, Caio Ferreira Freire Caetano, Thinali Sousa Dantas, Fabrício Bitu Sousa, Edgar Marçal de Barros Filho, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202204895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to develop and validate an App for identifying risk factors for oral cancer. To this end, we developed an App (OCS: Oral Cancer Screening) with predictors of Oral Cancer (OC) and algorithm assembly to estimate the risk of its development.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Simulated clinical cases were designed so that 40 professionals with expertise in oral diagnostics could validate the algorithm and test its usability (SUS: System Usability Score) and acceptability (TAM: Technology Acceptance Model). Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Friedman/Dunn tests, and Spearman correlation evaluated the SUS and TAM scales. ROC curve was plotted to estimate the cutoff point of the algorithm in suggesting a high risk for OCS of the simulated cases. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were additionally used (p<0.05, SPSS v20.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Professionals with expertise in oral diagnosis had usability of 84.63±10.66 and acceptability of 84.75±10.62, which correlated positively (p<0.001, r=0.647). Acting in clinical areas of dentistry (p=0.034) and history of performing OC risk factor orientation (p=0.048) increased acceptability while acting in higher education increased usability (p=0.011). The cutoff point suggested by the App after validation of the simulated clinical cases showed high sensitivity of 84.8% and lower specificity of 58.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OCS was effective and with adequate sensitivity, usability, and acceptability and may contribute to the detection of early oral lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"33 6","pages":"44-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop and validate an App for identifying risk factors for oral cancer. To this end, we developed an App (OCS: Oral Cancer Screening) with predictors of Oral Cancer (OC) and algorithm assembly to estimate the risk of its development.
Methodology: Simulated clinical cases were designed so that 40 professionals with expertise in oral diagnostics could validate the algorithm and test its usability (SUS: System Usability Score) and acceptability (TAM: Technology Acceptance Model). Cronbach's alpha coefficient, Friedman/Dunn tests, and Spearman correlation evaluated the SUS and TAM scales. ROC curve was plotted to estimate the cutoff point of the algorithm in suggesting a high risk for OCS of the simulated cases. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were additionally used (p<0.05, SPSS v20.0).
Results: Professionals with expertise in oral diagnosis had usability of 84.63±10.66 and acceptability of 84.75±10.62, which correlated positively (p<0.001, r=0.647). Acting in clinical areas of dentistry (p=0.034) and history of performing OC risk factor orientation (p=0.048) increased acceptability while acting in higher education increased usability (p=0.011). The cutoff point suggested by the App after validation of the simulated clinical cases showed high sensitivity of 84.8% and lower specificity of 58.4%.
Conclusion: The OCS was effective and with adequate sensitivity, usability, and acceptability and may contribute to the detection of early oral lesions.
本研究的目的是开发和验证用于识别口腔癌危险因素的应用程序。为此,我们开发了一个应用程序(OCS: Oral Cancer Screening),其中包含口腔癌(OC)的预测因子和算法集合,以估计其发展风险。方法:设计了模拟临床病例,以便40名具有口腔诊断专业知识的专业人员验证算法并测试其可用性(SUS:系统可用性评分)和可接受性(TAM:技术接受模型)。Cronbach’s alpha系数、Friedman/Dunn检验和Spearman相关性评估SUS和TAM量表。绘制ROC曲线来估计算法的截止点,表明模拟病例的OCS风险较高。结果:具有口腔诊断专业知识的专业人员可用性为84.63±10.66,可接受性为84.75±10.62,两者呈正相关(p结论:OCS是有效的,具有足够的灵敏度、可用性和可接受性,可能有助于早期发现口腔病变。
期刊介绍:
Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.