Learned cautions regarding antibody testing in mast cell activation syndrome.

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2023-08-14 eCollection Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1515/dx-2023-0032
Lawrence B Afrin, Tania T Dempsey, Gerhard J Molderings
{"title":"Learned cautions regarding antibody testing in mast cell activation syndrome.","authors":"Lawrence B Afrin, Tania T Dempsey, Gerhard J Molderings","doi":"10.1515/dx-2023-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe patterns observed in antibody titer trendlines in patients with mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS, a prevalent but underrecognized chronic multisystem inflammatory disorder of great clinical heterogeneity) and offer clinical lessons learned from such pattern recognition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The available records of 104 MCAS patients drawn from the authors' practices were reviewed, including all antibody tests therein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had positive/elevated antibodies of various sorts at various points, but for most of the antibodies which were found to be positive at least some points, the diseases classically associated with those antibodies were not present, marking such antibodies as clinically insignificant mimickers (likely consequent to inflammatory effects of MCAS on the immune system itself driving spurious/random antibody production) rather than \"on-target\" and pathogenic antibodies reflecting true disease warranting treatment. We also observed two distinct patterns in trendlines of the titers of the mimickers vs. the trendline pattern expected in a true case of an antibody-associated disease (AAD).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our observations suggest most positive antibody tests in MCAS patients represent detection of clinically insignificant mimicking antibodies. As such, to reduce incorrect diagnoses of AADs and inappropriate treatment in MCAS patients, caution is warranted in interpreting positive antibody tests in these patients. Except in clinically urgent/emergent situations, patience in determining the trendline of a positive antibody in an MCAS patient, and more carefully assessing whether the AAD is truly present, is to be preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"424-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2023-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe patterns observed in antibody titer trendlines in patients with mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS, a prevalent but underrecognized chronic multisystem inflammatory disorder of great clinical heterogeneity) and offer clinical lessons learned from such pattern recognition.

Methods: The available records of 104 MCAS patients drawn from the authors' practices were reviewed, including all antibody tests therein.

Results: All patients had positive/elevated antibodies of various sorts at various points, but for most of the antibodies which were found to be positive at least some points, the diseases classically associated with those antibodies were not present, marking such antibodies as clinically insignificant mimickers (likely consequent to inflammatory effects of MCAS on the immune system itself driving spurious/random antibody production) rather than "on-target" and pathogenic antibodies reflecting true disease warranting treatment. We also observed two distinct patterns in trendlines of the titers of the mimickers vs. the trendline pattern expected in a true case of an antibody-associated disease (AAD).

Conclusions: Our observations suggest most positive antibody tests in MCAS patients represent detection of clinically insignificant mimicking antibodies. As such, to reduce incorrect diagnoses of AADs and inappropriate treatment in MCAS patients, caution is warranted in interpreting positive antibody tests in these patients. Except in clinically urgent/emergent situations, patience in determining the trendline of a positive antibody in an MCAS patient, and more carefully assessing whether the AAD is truly present, is to be preferred.

学习了肥大细胞活化综合征抗体检测的注意事项。
目的:描述肥大细胞激活综合征(MCAS,一种普遍存在但未被充分认识的慢性多系统炎症性疾病,具有很大的临床异质性)患者抗体滴度趋势线的模式,并从这种模式识别中提供临床经验教训。方法:回顾104例MCAS患者的现有记录,包括其中的所有抗体检测。结果:所有的病人在不同的时间点都有不同种类的抗体呈阳性或升高,但对于大多数被发现呈阳性的抗体,至少在某些时间点,与这些抗体相关的疾病并不存在,将这些抗体标记为临床无关紧要的模仿物(可能是由于MCAS对免疫系统本身的炎症作用导致虚假/随机抗体的产生),而不是反映真正需要治疗的疾病的“靶标”和致病抗体。我们还观察到模拟者滴度的趋势线与抗体相关疾病(AAD)真实病例中预期的趋势线模式的两种不同模式。结论:我们的观察表明,在MCAS患者中,大多数阳性抗体检测代表检测到临床无关紧要的模拟抗体。因此,为了减少对MCAS患者aad的错误诊断和不适当的治疗,在解释这些患者的阳性抗体检测时需要谨慎。除了在临床紧急/紧急情况下,在确定MCAS患者抗体阳性的趋势时,更仔细地评估AAD是否真的存在,最好是耐心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信