Adherence to recommendations for preventing early neonatal sepsis associated with Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in a referral center in Bogotá, Colombia, 2019

Q3 Medicine
Ana María Ospino-Muñoz, Edna Alejandra Bonza-González, Cristian David Arévalo-Mojica, Jorge Andrés Rubio-Romero
{"title":"Adherence to recommendations for preventing early neonatal sepsis associated with Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in a referral center in Bogotá, Colombia, 2019","authors":"Ana María Ospino-Muñoz,&nbsp;Edna Alejandra Bonza-González,&nbsp;Cristian David Arévalo-Mojica,&nbsp;Jorge Andrés Rubio-Romero","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess adherence to screening recommendations for the prevention of neonatal sepsis, and describe the prevalence of colonization by Group B streptococcus (GBS) as well as the perinatal outcomes associated with colonization by this bacterium.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study that included pregnant women at term and their newborns, seen at a private high-complexity clinic in Bogota, between July 1 and December 31, 2019. Adherence to screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in pregnant women colonized with group B streptococcus, as well as the prevalence of colonization and early adverse perinatal outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1928 women were included. Adherence to screening was 68.0 % (95 % CI: 66-70.1) and 87.9 % to intrapartum antibiotic administration (95 % CI: 87.8-88); non-indicated use of antibiotics occurred in 14.7 % of the women, for 86.3 % final adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis. The prevalence of GBS colonization was 12.5 % (95 % CI: 10.7-14.3); the incidence of neonatal hospitalization was 27.5 % (95 % CI: 16.3-33.7). There were no cases of mortality or early neonatal sepsis attributable to screening status, colonization or prophylactic antibiotics for GBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Additional studies in other centers are required in order to determine adherence to this guideline, particularly in those that receive users affiliated to the subsidized regime which covers the most vulnerable population. Also, new population studies of GBS prevalence and cost-effectiveness of universal screening compared to risk factor-based antibiotic prophylaxis are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/24/2463-0225-rcog-73-03-3917.PMC9674380.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess adherence to screening recommendations for the prevention of neonatal sepsis, and describe the prevalence of colonization by Group B streptococcus (GBS) as well as the perinatal outcomes associated with colonization by this bacterium.

Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study that included pregnant women at term and their newborns, seen at a private high-complexity clinic in Bogota, between July 1 and December 31, 2019. Adherence to screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis in pregnant women colonized with group B streptococcus, as well as the prevalence of colonization and early adverse perinatal outcomes were assessed.

Results: Overall, 1928 women were included. Adherence to screening was 68.0 % (95 % CI: 66-70.1) and 87.9 % to intrapartum antibiotic administration (95 % CI: 87.8-88); non-indicated use of antibiotics occurred in 14.7 % of the women, for 86.3 % final adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis. The prevalence of GBS colonization was 12.5 % (95 % CI: 10.7-14.3); the incidence of neonatal hospitalization was 27.5 % (95 % CI: 16.3-33.7). There were no cases of mortality or early neonatal sepsis attributable to screening status, colonization or prophylactic antibiotics for GBS.

Conclusions: Additional studies in other centers are required in order to determine adherence to this guideline, particularly in those that receive users affiliated to the subsidized regime which covers the most vulnerable population. Also, new population studies of GBS prevalence and cost-effectiveness of universal screening compared to risk factor-based antibiotic prophylaxis are needed.

Abstract Image

2019年,哥伦比亚波哥大一家转诊中心遵守预防与无乳链球菌定植相关的早期新生儿败血症的建议
目的:评估新生儿脓毒症预防筛查建议的依从性,描述B群链球菌(GBS)定植的患病率以及与该细菌定植相关的围产期结局。材料和方法:回顾性队列研究,包括2019年7月1日至12月31日在波哥大一家私人高复杂性诊所就诊的足月孕妇及其新生儿。评估了感染B群链球菌的孕妇对筛查和产时抗生素预防的依从性,以及定植的患病率和早期不良围产期结局。结果:共纳入1928名女性。筛查依从率为68.0% (95% CI: 66-70.1),产时给药依从率为87.9% (95% CI: 87.8-88);14.7%的妇女无指征使用抗生素,86.3%的妇女最终坚持使用抗生素预防。GBS定植率为12.5% (95% CI: 10.7-14.3);新生儿住院率为27.5% (95% CI: 16.3-33.7)。没有病例死亡或早期新生儿败血症可归因于筛查状态,定植或预防性抗生素的GBS。结论:需要在其他中心进行进一步的研究,以确定本指南的遵守情况,特别是在那些接受补贴制度附属用户的中心,该制度涵盖了最脆弱的人群。此外,需要对GBS患病率和普遍筛查与基于风险因素的抗生素预防相比的成本效益进行新的人群研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología was founded in January 1949. It is the Federación Colombiana de Asociaciones de Obstetricia y Ginecología"s official periodic publication (formerly known as the Sociedad Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología). It is published quarterly and the following abbreviation should be used when citing the journal: Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. The publication is authorized by Mingobierno resolution 218/1950.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信