Using simulation-based training during hospital relocation: a controlled intervention study.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anders Lund Schram, Morten Søndergaard Lindhard, Magnus Bie, Maria Louise Gamborg, Neel Toxvig, Gitte Skov, Rune Dall Jensen
{"title":"Using simulation-based training during hospital relocation: a controlled intervention study.","authors":"Anders Lund Schram,&nbsp;Morten Søndergaard Lindhard,&nbsp;Magnus Bie,&nbsp;Maria Louise Gamborg,&nbsp;Neel Toxvig,&nbsp;Gitte Skov,&nbsp;Rune Dall Jensen","doi":"10.1186/s41077-022-00237-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During hospital relocations, it is important to support healthcare professionals becoming familiar with new settings. Simulation-based training seems promising and in situ simulation has been suggested as a beneficial educational tool to prepare healthcare professionals for relocation. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a simulation-based training intervention on health professionals´ readiness to work in their new environment, as well as investigate sick leave before and after relocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a controlled intervention study implemented at a university hospital in Denmark. Simulation was used to prepare employees for workflows prior to relocation. Before relocation, 1199 healthcare professionals participated in the in situ simulation-based training program. Questionnaires on readiness to perform were distributed to participants at pre-, post-, and follow-up (6 months) measurement. In addition, data on participants' sick leave was gathered from a business intelligence portal. To compare dependent and independent groups, paired and unpaired t tests were performed on mean score of readiness to perform and sick leave.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the control group, healthcare professionals participating in the intervention felt significantly more ready to work in a new hospital environment. As a measure of psychological wellbeing, register data indicated no difference in sick leave, when comparing intervention and control groups before and after participating in the in situ simulation-based training program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals felt significantly more ready to work in a new environment, after participating in the in situ simulation-based training program, indicating that the intervention supported healthcare professionals during relocations. This may mitigate feelings of uncertainty; however, further research is needed to explore such effects.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by The Regional Ethics Committee (no. 1-16-02-222-22).</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"7 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758894/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00237-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: During hospital relocations, it is important to support healthcare professionals becoming familiar with new settings. Simulation-based training seems promising and in situ simulation has been suggested as a beneficial educational tool to prepare healthcare professionals for relocation. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a simulation-based training intervention on health professionals´ readiness to work in their new environment, as well as investigate sick leave before and after relocation.

Methods: The study was a controlled intervention study implemented at a university hospital in Denmark. Simulation was used to prepare employees for workflows prior to relocation. Before relocation, 1199 healthcare professionals participated in the in situ simulation-based training program. Questionnaires on readiness to perform were distributed to participants at pre-, post-, and follow-up (6 months) measurement. In addition, data on participants' sick leave was gathered from a business intelligence portal. To compare dependent and independent groups, paired and unpaired t tests were performed on mean score of readiness to perform and sick leave.

Results: Compared to the control group, healthcare professionals participating in the intervention felt significantly more ready to work in a new hospital environment. As a measure of psychological wellbeing, register data indicated no difference in sick leave, when comparing intervention and control groups before and after participating in the in situ simulation-based training program.

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals felt significantly more ready to work in a new environment, after participating in the in situ simulation-based training program, indicating that the intervention supported healthcare professionals during relocations. This may mitigate feelings of uncertainty; however, further research is needed to explore such effects.

Trial registration: The study was approved by The Regional Ethics Committee (no. 1-16-02-222-22).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在医院搬迁期间使用基于模拟的培训:一项对照干预研究
背景:在医院搬迁期间,支持医疗保健专业人员熟悉新环境是很重要的。基于模拟的培训似乎很有前途,现场模拟已被建议作为一种有益的教育工具,为医疗保健专业人员的搬迁做好准备。本研究旨在调查基于模拟的培训干预对卫生专业人员在新环境中准备工作的影响,并调查搬迁前后的病假情况。方法:本研究是在丹麦一所大学医院实施的对照干预研究。模拟是用来让员工在搬迁前为工作流程做好准备。在搬迁之前,1199名医疗保健专业人员参加了基于现场模拟的培训计划。在测试前、测试后和测试后(6个月),向参与者分发了关于表演准备程度的问卷。此外,还从商业智能门户网站收集了参与者的病假数据。为了比较依赖组和独立组,对准备执行和病假的平均得分进行配对和非配对t检验。结果:与对照组相比,参与干预的医护人员对在新的医院环境中工作有了明显的准备。作为心理健康的衡量标准,当比较干预组和对照组在参加基于现场模拟的培训计划之前和之后的病假时,登记数据显示没有差异。结论:医疗保健专业人员在参加了基于原位模拟的培训计划后,对在新环境中工作的准备程度明显提高,这表明干预措施在搬迁期间对医疗保健专业人员提供了支持。这可能会减轻不确定感;然而,需要进一步的研究来探索这种影响。试验注册:本研究已获区域伦理委员会批准(编号:010812889)。1-16-02-222-22)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信