Low- and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation and arterial blood pressure in patients with chronic pain and hypertension: a retrospective study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kimia Memar, Sunita N Varghese, Austin G Morrison, Davina A Clonch, Christopher M Lam, Seth W Holwerda
{"title":"Low- and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation and arterial blood pressure in patients with chronic pain and hypertension: a retrospective study.","authors":"Kimia Memar,&nbsp;Sunita N Varghese,&nbsp;Austin G Morrison,&nbsp;Davina A Clonch,&nbsp;Christopher M Lam,&nbsp;Seth W Holwerda","doi":"10.1007/s10286-023-00947-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evidence suggests that traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation (LF-SCS) reduces arterial blood pressure (BP) in patients with chronic pain and hypertension independent of improved pain symptoms. However, it remains unclear whether high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) also lowers BP in chronic pain patients with hypertension. Therefore, in a retrospective study design, we tested the hypothesis that clinic BP would be significantly reduced following implantation of HF-SCS in patients with chronic pain and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinic BP within 3 months before and after surgical implantation of either a LF-SCS or HF-SCS device between 2010 and 2020 were collected from electronic medical records at The University of Kansas Health System (TUKHS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 132 patients had available records of clinic BP (64 ± 13 years of age). Patients with hypertension (n = 32) demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in systolic BP (-8 ± 12 versus 2 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001) following implantation compared with normotensive patients (n = 100). Importantly, the change in BP was inversely related to baseline BP independent of age and sex following implantation of HF-SCS (n = 70, R =  -0.50, P < 0.001) or LF-SCS (n = 62, R =  -0.42, P = 0.001). Higher pain scores before implantation were not associated with reduction in systolic BP (R = 0.10, P = 0.43) or diastolic BP (R =  -0.08, P = 0.53) (n = 69) after implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings confirm previous studies showing reduced BP following implantation of LF-SCS in patients with chronic pain and hypertension and provide novel data regarding reduced BP following implantation of newer generation HF-SCS devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-023-00947-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence suggests that traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation (LF-SCS) reduces arterial blood pressure (BP) in patients with chronic pain and hypertension independent of improved pain symptoms. However, it remains unclear whether high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) also lowers BP in chronic pain patients with hypertension. Therefore, in a retrospective study design, we tested the hypothesis that clinic BP would be significantly reduced following implantation of HF-SCS in patients with chronic pain and hypertension.

Methods: Clinic BP within 3 months before and after surgical implantation of either a LF-SCS or HF-SCS device between 2010 and 2020 were collected from electronic medical records at The University of Kansas Health System (TUKHS).

Results: A total of 132 patients had available records of clinic BP (64 ± 13 years of age). Patients with hypertension (n = 32) demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in systolic BP (-8 ± 12 versus 2 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001) following implantation compared with normotensive patients (n = 100). Importantly, the change in BP was inversely related to baseline BP independent of age and sex following implantation of HF-SCS (n = 70, R =  -0.50, P < 0.001) or LF-SCS (n = 62, R =  -0.42, P = 0.001). Higher pain scores before implantation were not associated with reduction in systolic BP (R = 0.10, P = 0.43) or diastolic BP (R =  -0.08, P = 0.53) (n = 69) after implantation.

Conclusion: These findings confirm previous studies showing reduced BP following implantation of LF-SCS in patients with chronic pain and hypertension and provide novel data regarding reduced BP following implantation of newer generation HF-SCS devices.

Abstract Image

慢性疼痛和高血压患者的低频和高频脊髓刺激和动脉血压:一项回顾性研究。
目的:有证据表明,传统的低频脊髓刺激(LF-SCS)可以降低慢性疼痛和高血压患者的动脉血压(BP),而无需改善疼痛症状。然而,目前尚不清楚高频脊髓刺激(HF-SCS)是否也能降低高血压慢性疼痛患者的血压。因此,在回顾性研究设计中,我们验证了慢性疼痛和高血压患者植入HF-SCS后临床血压会显著降低的假设。方法:收集2010年至2020年期间在堪萨斯大学卫生系统(TUKHS)电子病历中植入LF-SCS或HF-SCS装置前后3个月内的临床血压。结果:132例患者有临床血压记录(64±13岁)。高血压患者(n = 32)的收缩压明显降低(-8±12 mmHg vs . 2±9 mmHg), P结论:这些发现证实了先前关于慢性疼痛和高血压患者植入LF-SCS后血压降低的研究,并提供了关于植入新一代HF-SCS装置后血压降低的新数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信