Clinical Prediction Models for Nonmortality Outcomes in Older Adults With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yoichi Kaizu, Shuntaro Tamura, Hiroyuki Saito, Shota Hayashi, Hiroki Iwamoto, Kazuhiro Miyata
{"title":"Clinical Prediction Models for Nonmortality Outcomes in Older Adults With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yoichi Kaizu, Shuntaro Tamura, Hiroyuki Saito, Shota Hayashi, Hiroki Iwamoto, Kazuhiro Miyata","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several hip fracture clinical prediction models have been developed. We conducted this study to (i) map outcomes used in clinical prediction models for hip fracture, (ii) identify the domains and instruments of predictors, and (iii) assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed systematic searches of studies published from June 2002 to June 2023 in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CiNii, and Ichushi databases. After the relevant articles were identified, we performed the data extraction and bias risk assessment. We used the Prediction Study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to assess each study's risk of bias. Outcome mapping was performed for the core outcome set of hip fractures. Qualitative synthesis and the PROBAST evaluation were performed on other-than-mortality core outcomes, which are difficult to target in rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 3 206 studies for eligibility; 45 studies were included in the outcome mapping, and 10 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Outcomes included mortality (n = 35), mobility (n = 8), and activities of daily living (n = 2). No clinical prediction models had pain or health-related quality of life as an outcome. Predictors were reported in 8 domains and 38 measures. The PROBAST evaluation showed a high risk of bias in all 10 studies that were eligible for a qualitative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical prediction models had only mortality, mobility, and activities of daily living as outcomes. The development of clinical prediction models with pain and health-related quality of life as outcomes is necessary. Clinical prediction models overcoming the risk of bias identified in this study are also needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49953,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2363-2370"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several hip fracture clinical prediction models have been developed. We conducted this study to (i) map outcomes used in clinical prediction models for hip fracture, (ii) identify the domains and instruments of predictors, and (iii) assess the risk of bias.

Methods: We performed systematic searches of studies published from June 2002 to June 2023 in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CiNii, and Ichushi databases. After the relevant articles were identified, we performed the data extraction and bias risk assessment. We used the Prediction Study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to assess each study's risk of bias. Outcome mapping was performed for the core outcome set of hip fractures. Qualitative synthesis and the PROBAST evaluation were performed on other-than-mortality core outcomes, which are difficult to target in rehabilitation.

Results: We screened 3 206 studies for eligibility; 45 studies were included in the outcome mapping, and 10 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Outcomes included mortality (n = 35), mobility (n = 8), and activities of daily living (n = 2). No clinical prediction models had pain or health-related quality of life as an outcome. Predictors were reported in 8 domains and 38 measures. The PROBAST evaluation showed a high risk of bias in all 10 studies that were eligible for a qualitative synthesis.

Conclusions: The clinical prediction models had only mortality, mobility, and activities of daily living as outcomes. The development of clinical prediction models with pain and health-related quality of life as outcomes is necessary. Clinical prediction models overcoming the risk of bias identified in this study are also needed.

老年人髋部骨折非死亡率预后的临床预测模型:系统回顾。
背景:已经开发了几种髋部骨折的临床预测模型。我们进行这项研究是为了(i)绘制用于髋部骨折临床预测模型的结果图,(ii)确定预测因子的领域和工具,以及(iii)评估偏倚风险。方法:系统检索2002年6月至2023年6月在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、CINAHL、CiNii和Ichushi数据库中发表的研究。在确定相关文章后,我们进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。我们使用预测研究偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)来评估每项研究的偏倚风险。对髋部骨折的核心结果集进行结果映射。定性综合和PROBAST评估非死亡率的核心结果,这在康复中很难定位。结果:我们筛选了3 206项研究的合格性;45项研究纳入结果图,10项研究纳入定性综合。结果包括死亡率(n = 35)、活动性(n = 8)和日常生活活动(n = 2)。没有临床预测模型将疼痛或与健康相关的生活质量作为结果。在8个领域和38个措施中报告了预测因子。PROBAST评估显示,所有10项有资格进行定性综合的研究均存在高偏倚风险。结论:临床预测模型仅将死亡率、流动性和日常生活活动作为结果。发展以疼痛和健康相关生活质量为结果的临床预测模型是必要的。还需要克服本研究中发现的偏倚风险的临床预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Publishes articles representing the full range of medical sciences pertaining to aging. Appropriate areas include, but are not limited to, basic medical science, clinical epidemiology, clinical research, and health services research for professions such as medicine, dentistry, allied health sciences, and nursing. It publishes articles on research pertinent to human biology and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信