The Unethical Use of Paracetamol As a Food Tenderizer in Four Selected African Countries: A Major Public Health Concern?

Ewurabena Y Afful, Samuel Frimpong-Manso, Samuel O Bekoe, Chris O Barfi, Kwabena F M Opuni, Mahmood B Oppong
{"title":"The Unethical Use of Paracetamol As a Food Tenderizer in Four Selected African Countries: A Major Public Health Concern?","authors":"Ewurabena Y Afful,&nbsp;Samuel Frimpong-Manso,&nbsp;Samuel O Bekoe,&nbsp;Chris O Barfi,&nbsp;Kwabena F M Opuni,&nbsp;Mahmood B Oppong","doi":"10.2174/2949681015666220810125820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paracetamol poisoning is the commonest cause of acute liver injury. Therefore, the unethical use of paracetamol as a food tenderizer poses a threat to human health. Although this is a common practice in Ghana, Uganda, Nigeria, and Kenya, there are few or no scientific records on the use of paracetamol as a food tenderizer and its deleterious effects, thus making it difficult to regulate this practice. This review aims to fully collate and present a systematic overview of the literature on the use of paracetamol as a food tenderizer in these countries, the potentially harmful effects posed by the practice, and measures in place to curb the situation. Additionally, this review aims to reveal the scientific gaps and areas requiring more research, thus providing a reference for further research to regulate this unscrupulous practice. From our extensive review of the literature, the high cost of fuel used in cooking and longer cooking times are the main reasons for the inappropriate use of paracetamol as a food tenderizer. Also, this review concludes that little has been done to create public awareness of this unethical practice. Furthermore, few ways to monitor, control and regulate this practice have been proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72844,"journal":{"name":"Drug metabolism and bioanalysis letters","volume":"15 3","pages":"159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug metabolism and bioanalysis letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2949681015666220810125820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paracetamol poisoning is the commonest cause of acute liver injury. Therefore, the unethical use of paracetamol as a food tenderizer poses a threat to human health. Although this is a common practice in Ghana, Uganda, Nigeria, and Kenya, there are few or no scientific records on the use of paracetamol as a food tenderizer and its deleterious effects, thus making it difficult to regulate this practice. This review aims to fully collate and present a systematic overview of the literature on the use of paracetamol as a food tenderizer in these countries, the potentially harmful effects posed by the practice, and measures in place to curb the situation. Additionally, this review aims to reveal the scientific gaps and areas requiring more research, thus providing a reference for further research to regulate this unscrupulous practice. From our extensive review of the literature, the high cost of fuel used in cooking and longer cooking times are the main reasons for the inappropriate use of paracetamol as a food tenderizer. Also, this review concludes that little has been done to create public awareness of this unethical practice. Furthermore, few ways to monitor, control and regulate this practice have been proposed.

在四个选定的非洲国家,不道德地使用扑热息痛作为食物嫩化剂:一个主要的公共卫生问题?
扑热息痛中毒是急性肝损伤最常见的原因。因此,不道德地使用扑热息痛作为食物嫩化剂对人类健康构成威胁。尽管这在加纳、乌干达、尼日利亚和肯尼亚是一种常见的做法,但关于使用扑热息痛作为食物嫩化剂及其有害影响的科学记录很少或根本没有,因此很难规范这种做法。这篇综述的目的是对这些国家使用扑热息痛作为食物嫩化剂的文献进行全面整理和系统概述,这种做法可能造成的有害影响,以及遏制这种情况的措施。此外,本文旨在揭示科学空白和需要进一步研究的领域,从而为进一步研究规范这种不道德的做法提供参考。从我们对文献的广泛回顾来看,烹饪中使用的高成本燃料和较长的烹饪时间是不适当使用扑热息痛作为食物嫩化剂的主要原因。此外,这篇综述的结论是,几乎没有采取措施来提高公众对这种不道德做法的认识。此外,很少有人提出监测、控制和规范这种做法的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信