Synthesis of a novel injectable alginate impression material and impression accuracy evaluation.

Q3 Medicine
Xingzi Liu, Xinhui Wang, Jingya Wu, Jingjing Luo, Yun Wang, Quanli Li
{"title":"Synthesis of a novel injectable alginate impression material and impression accuracy evaluation.","authors":"Xingzi Liu, Xinhui Wang, Jingya Wu, Jingjing Luo, Yun Wang, Quanli Li","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2022.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This work aimed to synthesize a novel injectable alginate impression material and evaluate its accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Certain proportions of sodium alginate, trisodium phosphate dodecahydrate, potassium fluorotitanate, diatomaceous earth, and other ingredients were dissolved in water and mixed evenly with a planetary centrifugal mixer to obtain a certain viscosity base paste. Certain proportions of calcium sulfate hemihydrate, magnesium oxide, glycerin, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400 were mixed evenly with a planetary centrifugal mixer to obtain the reactor paste with the same viscosity as the base paste. The base and reactor pastes were poured into a two-cylinder cartridge at a 2∶1 volume ratio. A gun device was used to accomplish mixing by compressing materials into a mixing tip. The samples were divided into three groups: injectable alginate impression materials (IA group) as the experimental group, and Jeltrate alginate impression materials (JA group) and Silagum-putty/light addition silicone rubber impression materials (SI group) as the two control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the injectable alginate impression materials had a denser structure and fewer bubbles than the commercial alginate impression material. The accuracy of the three kinds of impression materials was evaluated by 3D image superposition. The deviations between the three test group models and the standard model (trueness) were 49.58 μm±1.453 μm (IA group), 54.75 μm±7.264 μm (JA group), and 30.92 μm±1.013 μm (SI group). The deviations of the models within each test group (precision) were 85.79 μm±8.191 μm (IA group), 97.65 μm±11.060 μm (JA group), and 56.51 μm±4.995 μm (SI group). Significant differences in trueness and precision were found among the three kinds of impression materials (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accuracy of the new injectable alginate impression material was better than that of the traditional powder-type alginate impression material but worse than that of the addition silicone rubber impression materials. The novel injec-table alginate impression material demonstrated good operation performance and impression accuracy, showing broad application prospect.</p>","PeriodicalId":35800,"journal":{"name":"华西口腔医学杂志","volume":"40 6","pages":"662-667"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763959/pdf/wcjs-40-06-662.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"华西口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2022.06.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This work aimed to synthesize a novel injectable alginate impression material and evaluate its accuracy.

Methods: Certain proportions of sodium alginate, trisodium phosphate dodecahydrate, potassium fluorotitanate, diatomaceous earth, and other ingredients were dissolved in water and mixed evenly with a planetary centrifugal mixer to obtain a certain viscosity base paste. Certain proportions of calcium sulfate hemihydrate, magnesium oxide, glycerin, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400 were mixed evenly with a planetary centrifugal mixer to obtain the reactor paste with the same viscosity as the base paste. The base and reactor pastes were poured into a two-cylinder cartridge at a 2∶1 volume ratio. A gun device was used to accomplish mixing by compressing materials into a mixing tip. The samples were divided into three groups: injectable alginate impression materials (IA group) as the experimental group, and Jeltrate alginate impression materials (JA group) and Silagum-putty/light addition silicone rubber impression materials (SI group) as the two control groups.

Results: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the injectable alginate impression materials had a denser structure and fewer bubbles than the commercial alginate impression material. The accuracy of the three kinds of impression materials was evaluated by 3D image superposition. The deviations between the three test group models and the standard model (trueness) were 49.58 μm±1.453 μm (IA group), 54.75 μm±7.264 μm (JA group), and 30.92 μm±1.013 μm (SI group). The deviations of the models within each test group (precision) were 85.79 μm±8.191 μm (IA group), 97.65 μm±11.060 μm (JA group), and 56.51 μm±4.995 μm (SI group). Significant differences in trueness and precision were found among the three kinds of impression materials (P<0.05).

Conclusions: The accuracy of the new injectable alginate impression material was better than that of the traditional powder-type alginate impression material but worse than that of the addition silicone rubber impression materials. The novel injec-table alginate impression material demonstrated good operation performance and impression accuracy, showing broad application prospect.

新型可注射藻酸盐印模材料的合成及印模准确性评估。
目的:本研究旨在合成新型可注射藻酸盐印模材料,并评估其准确性:方法:将一定比例的海藻酸钠、十二水磷酸三钠、氟钛酸钾、硅藻土等成分溶解于水中,并用搅拌器均匀搅拌:方法:将一定比例的海藻酸钠、十二水磷酸三钠、氟钛酸钾、硅藻土等成分溶于水,用行星离心搅拌机搅拌均匀,得到一定粘度的基膏。将一定比例的半水硫酸钙、氧化镁、甘油和聚乙二醇(PEG)400 用行星离心搅拌机混合均匀,得到与基浆粘度相同的反应器浆料。将基础浆料和反应器浆料以 2∶1 的体积比倒入一个双缸筒中。使用喷枪装置通过将材料压入混合尖端来完成混合。样品分为三组:注射用海藻酸盐印模材料(IA 组)为实验组,Jeltrate 藻酸盐印模材料(JA 组)和 Silagum-putty/light addition 硅橡胶印模材料(SI 组)为对照组:扫描电子显微镜(SEM)显示,与商用海藻酸盐印模材料相比,注射用海藻酸盐印模材料的结构更致密,气泡更少。通过三维图像叠加评估了三种印模材料的准确性。三个试验组模型与标准模型的偏差(真实度)分别为 49.58 μm±1.453 μm(IA 组)、54.75 μm±7.264 μm(JA 组)和 30.92 μm±1.013 μm(SI 组)。各测试组内模型的偏差(精度)分别为 85.79 μm±8.191 μm(IA 组)、97.65 μm±11.060 μm(JA 组)和 56.51 μm±4.995 μm(SI 组)。三种印模材料的真实度和精确度存在显著差异(PConclusions:新型可注射海藻酸盐印模材料的精确度优于传统粉末型海藻酸盐印模材料,但差于添加型硅橡胶印模材料。新型可注射海藻酸盐印模材料具有良好的操作性能和印模准确性,具有广阔的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
华西口腔医学杂志
华西口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6397
期刊介绍: West China Journal of Stomatology (WCJS, pISSN 1000-1182, eISSN 2618-0456, CN 51-1169/R), published bimonthly, is a peer-reviewed Open Access journal, hosted by Sichuan university and Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. WCJS was established in 1983 and indexed in Medline/Pubmed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, Chemical Abstract(CA), CNKI, WANFANG Data, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信