What's in a choice? Ethical, cultural and social dimensions of sex selection in China

Ole Döring
{"title":"What's in a choice? Ethical, cultural and social dimensions of sex selection in China","authors":"Ole Döring","doi":"10.1002/huon.200800002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper describes the situation of sex selection in China and the related ethical debate, from the perspective of philosophical ethics. It begins with a discussion of the analytical-bioethical standard approach to sex selection, and explains, why it is methodologically inadequate as well as ethically barren. It gives a summarizing account of the empirical status of sex-selection in China, building on empirical studies about the phenomenon of “missing girls” and gender discrimination, and analyzes the relevant cultural and ethical circumstances. It introduces the recent governance measures and elaborates the ethical discussion in China. The paper concludes with a reflection on sex-selection in China, and eugenics. The main thesis is that, in contemporary China, it would be inappropriate to assess the issues of sex selection in terms of “freedom of choice” or as an “individual's right to independent procreative decision making”. Hence, it argues, any attempt to declare the de facto practice in China on face value as an expression of individual, social or cultural self-determination is fundamentally flawed, would be unsympathetic to the affected population and could merely support political and social apologetics. Whereas we cannot draw much advice from China about proper sex-selection, discussion of the Chinese situation re-emphasizes the pertinent ethical perspective, as a universal humanitarian concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":100613,"journal":{"name":"human_ontogenetics","volume":"2 1","pages":"11-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/huon.200800002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"human_ontogenetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/huon.200800002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper describes the situation of sex selection in China and the related ethical debate, from the perspective of philosophical ethics. It begins with a discussion of the analytical-bioethical standard approach to sex selection, and explains, why it is methodologically inadequate as well as ethically barren. It gives a summarizing account of the empirical status of sex-selection in China, building on empirical studies about the phenomenon of “missing girls” and gender discrimination, and analyzes the relevant cultural and ethical circumstances. It introduces the recent governance measures and elaborates the ethical discussion in China. The paper concludes with a reflection on sex-selection in China, and eugenics. The main thesis is that, in contemporary China, it would be inappropriate to assess the issues of sex selection in terms of “freedom of choice” or as an “individual's right to independent procreative decision making”. Hence, it argues, any attempt to declare the de facto practice in China on face value as an expression of individual, social or cultural self-determination is fundamentally flawed, would be unsympathetic to the affected population and could merely support political and social apologetics. Whereas we cannot draw much advice from China about proper sex-selection, discussion of the Chinese situation re-emphasizes the pertinent ethical perspective, as a universal humanitarian concern.

选择有什么用?中国性别选择的伦理、文化和社会维度
本文从哲学伦理学的角度描述了中国性别选择的现状和相关的伦理争论。它首先讨论了性别选择的分析-生物伦理标准方法,并解释了为什么它在方法上不充分以及在伦理上贫瘠。在对“失踪女孩”和性别歧视现象进行实证研究的基础上,总结了性别选择在中国的实证现状,并分析了相关的文化和伦理环境。它介绍了最近的治理措施,并阐述了中国的伦理讨论。文章最后对中国性别选择和优生学进行了反思。本文的主要论点是,在当代中国,将性别选择问题从“选择自由”或“个人独立生育决策的权利”的角度来评价是不恰当的。因此,它认为,任何企图从表面上把中国的事实实践宣称为个人、社会或文化自决的表达都是有根本缺陷的,这将是对受影响人口的不同情,只会支持政治和社会的辩护。虽然我们无法从中国获得关于正确性别选择的建议,但对中国情况的讨论再次强调了相关的伦理观点,作为一种普遍的人道主义关切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信