The perception of shared governance and engagement in decision-making among nurses.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12817
Ahmed Jaber, Wafa'a F Ta'an, Mohammed K Aldalaykeh, Yasmin M Al-Shannaq, Islam A Oweidat, Tareq L Mukattash
{"title":"The perception of shared governance and engagement in decision-making among nurses.","authors":"Ahmed Jaber,&nbsp;Wafa'a F Ta'an,&nbsp;Mohammed K Aldalaykeh,&nbsp;Yasmin M Al-Shannaq,&nbsp;Islam A Oweidat,&nbsp;Tareq L Mukattash","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared governance is a structural framework for operationalizing nursing ownership and accountability for nursing practice. Healthcare institutions are striving to promote healthy and satisfactory work conditions to retain their qualified personnel and achieve organizational stability and high care quality. However, little is known about nurses' participation in governance in developing countries.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the levels of shared governance, also known as professional governance, among nurses in Jordan. The demographics of the study participants will also be assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study used a cross-sectional design implementing an anonymous online survey technique to collect data from 111 nurses on the Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG). Descriptive statistics were performed to evaluate the nurses' perception of the concept of shared governance in the domains of personnel, information, resources, participation goals and conflict resolution, and practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 111 nurses, 55% of the participants were females, 45.5% were affiliated with governmental hospitals, and about half of them worked in critical care units. The analysis showed that the mean score for the total IPNG was 113 (SD = 26.28). The analyses of the mean scores of IPNG domains ranged from 11.5 (SD = 4.6) for goals and conflict resolution to 23.8 (SD = 5.7) for access to information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results revealed that nurses' average perception of professional governance demonstrated shared governance, and more specifically, in the lower level of shared governance where decisions are made primarily by management with some staff input. Analysis of the domains of governance revealed that participants' scores corresponded with shared governance in the areas of information, resources, goals and conflict, and practice, while traditional governance was prevalent in the governance of nursing personnel and participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an agreement on the need of moving the position of frontline nurses to the center of their organizations where equity, accountability, and ownership are the pillars of participative governance. Frontline nurses need further empowerment to be more actively engaged especially in the management of nursing staff and related structures and in the participation in structures connected to governance activities at different organizational levels such as in committees.</p>","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1169-1175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Shared governance is a structural framework for operationalizing nursing ownership and accountability for nursing practice. Healthcare institutions are striving to promote healthy and satisfactory work conditions to retain their qualified personnel and achieve organizational stability and high care quality. However, little is known about nurses' participation in governance in developing countries.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the levels of shared governance, also known as professional governance, among nurses in Jordan. The demographics of the study participants will also be assessed.

Methods: The current study used a cross-sectional design implementing an anonymous online survey technique to collect data from 111 nurses on the Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG). Descriptive statistics were performed to evaluate the nurses' perception of the concept of shared governance in the domains of personnel, information, resources, participation goals and conflict resolution, and practice.

Results: Among the 111 nurses, 55% of the participants were females, 45.5% were affiliated with governmental hospitals, and about half of them worked in critical care units. The analysis showed that the mean score for the total IPNG was 113 (SD = 26.28). The analyses of the mean scores of IPNG domains ranged from 11.5 (SD = 4.6) for goals and conflict resolution to 23.8 (SD = 5.7) for access to information.

Discussion: The results revealed that nurses' average perception of professional governance demonstrated shared governance, and more specifically, in the lower level of shared governance where decisions are made primarily by management with some staff input. Analysis of the domains of governance revealed that participants' scores corresponded with shared governance in the areas of information, resources, goals and conflict, and practice, while traditional governance was prevalent in the governance of nursing personnel and participation.

Conclusion: There is an agreement on the need of moving the position of frontline nurses to the center of their organizations where equity, accountability, and ownership are the pillars of participative governance. Frontline nurses need further empowerment to be more actively engaged especially in the management of nursing staff and related structures and in the participation in structures connected to governance activities at different organizational levels such as in committees.

护士对共同治理和参与决策的看法。
背景:共享治理是实现护理所有权和护理实践问责制的结构框架。保健机构正在努力促进健康和令人满意的工作条件,以留住合格的人员,实现组织的稳定和高质量的护理。然而,人们对发展中国家护士参与治理的情况知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在评估约旦护士的共同治理水平,也称为专业治理。研究参与者的人口统计数据也将被评估。方法:本研究采用横断面设计,采用匿名在线调查技术,收集111名护士的专业护理治理指数(IPNG)数据。采用描述性统计来评估护士在人员、信息、资源、参与目标和冲突解决以及实践等领域对共享治理概念的看法。结果:111名护士中,女性占55%,45.5%在公立医院工作,约一半在重症监护病房工作。分析结果显示,IPNG总分平均为113分(SD = 26.28)。IPNG域的平均得分从目标和冲突解决的11.5分(SD = 4.6)到信息获取的23.8分(SD = 5.7)不等。讨论:结果显示,护士对专业治理的平均感知表明共享治理,更具体地说,在共享治理的较低水平,决策主要由管理层做出,并有一些工作人员的投入。对治理领域的分析表明,参与者的得分与信息、资源、目标和冲突以及实践领域的共享治理相对应,而传统治理在护理人员治理和参与方面普遍存在。结论:人们一致认为,有必要将一线护士的位置移至其组织的中心,在那里,公平、问责和所有权是参与式治理的支柱。一线护士需要进一步授权,以便更积极地参与护理人员和相关结构的管理,并参与与不同组织级别(如委员会)的治理活动相关的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NURSING FORUM
NURSING FORUM NURSING-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信