Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Outcomes of an Integrated Telemedicine Intervention Combining Naltrexone and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder.

Suzette Glasner, Jamie Webb, Darcy Michero, Courtney Motschman, Laura Monico, Alfonso Ang, Peyton Pielsticker
{"title":"Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Outcomes of an Integrated Telemedicine Intervention Combining Naltrexone and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder.","authors":"Suzette Glasner,&nbsp;Jamie Webb,&nbsp;Darcy Michero,&nbsp;Courtney Motschman,&nbsp;Laura Monico,&nbsp;Alfonso Ang,&nbsp;Peyton Pielsticker","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2022.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A small fraction of individuals in need of treatment for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) seek care, owing largely to barriers to accessing treatment. In the present pilot study, we examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of an m-health intervention combining cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy for individuals with AUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with AUD (<i>N</i> = 26) recruited through online, social media-based advertising were enrolled in a 12-week, integrated telemedicine intervention combining psychosocial treatment with medical management: Quit Genius for AUD (QG-A). Feasibility, acceptability, perceived helpfulness, treatment engagement, retention, completion, and clinical outcomes including alcohol use and secondary mental health outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants found the QG-A intervention to be acceptable and helpful in facilitating action toward their therapeutic goals concerning alcohol use. Treatment completion, achieved by the majority (85%) of participants, was excellent. On average, participants reduced their past 30-day alcohol use from baseline (mean proportion of days of abstinent = 0.13) to follow-up (<i>M</i> = 0.59), <i>t</i>(19) = -4.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and consumed fewer drinks per drinking day from baseline (<i>M</i> = 6.7) to follow-up (<i>M</i> = 2.0), <i>t</i>(19) = 3.61, <i>p</i> < 0.001. Concurrently, reductions were observed in depressive (<i>t</i>[22] = 5.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and anxiety (<i>t</i>[22] = 2.87, <i>p</i> < 0.01) symptom severity, from the moderately severe range at baseline to the mild range at treatment-end, with increases in resilience (<i>t</i>[22] = -3.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Addressing AUDs using an integrated m-health intervention to deliver evidence-based psychosocial and pharmacological treatment is feasible and may produce improvements in both alcohol use and psychiatric symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"184-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9718429/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A small fraction of individuals in need of treatment for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) seek care, owing largely to barriers to accessing treatment. In the present pilot study, we examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of an m-health intervention combining cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy for individuals with AUD.

Methods: Adults with AUD (N = 26) recruited through online, social media-based advertising were enrolled in a 12-week, integrated telemedicine intervention combining psychosocial treatment with medical management: Quit Genius for AUD (QG-A). Feasibility, acceptability, perceived helpfulness, treatment engagement, retention, completion, and clinical outcomes including alcohol use and secondary mental health outcomes were assessed.

Results: Participants found the QG-A intervention to be acceptable and helpful in facilitating action toward their therapeutic goals concerning alcohol use. Treatment completion, achieved by the majority (85%) of participants, was excellent. On average, participants reduced their past 30-day alcohol use from baseline (mean proportion of days of abstinent = 0.13) to follow-up (M = 0.59), t(19) = -4.97, p < 0.001, and consumed fewer drinks per drinking day from baseline (M = 6.7) to follow-up (M = 2.0), t(19) = 3.61, p < 0.001. Concurrently, reductions were observed in depressive (t[22] = 5.39, p < 0.001) and anxiety (t[22] = 2.87, p < 0.01) symptom severity, from the moderately severe range at baseline to the mild range at treatment-end, with increases in resilience (t[22] = -3.54, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Addressing AUDs using an integrated m-health intervention to deliver evidence-based psychosocial and pharmacological treatment is feasible and may produce improvements in both alcohol use and psychiatric symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

纳曲酮联合认知行为治疗酒精使用障碍的综合远程医疗干预的可行性、可接受性和初步结果
背景:一小部分需要治疗酒精使用障碍(AUDs)的个体寻求护理,主要是由于获得治疗的障碍。在目前的试点研究中,我们研究了将认知行为疗法和药物疗法相结合的移动健康干预对AUD患者的可行性、可接受性和初步结果。方法:通过在线社交媒体广告招募的成年AUD患者(N = 26)参加了为期12周的综合远程医疗干预,结合心理社会治疗和医疗管理:戒烟天才AUD (QG-A)。评估了可行性、可接受性、感知帮助、治疗参与、保留、完成和临床结果,包括酒精使用和次要心理健康结果。结果:参与者发现QG-A干预是可接受的,有助于促进他们对酒精使用的治疗目标的行动。大多数(85%)参与者的治疗完成情况非常好。参与者平均减少了过去30天的酒精使用从基线(平均天的禁欲者的比例= 0.13)追踪(M = 0.59), t (19) = -4.97, p M = 6.7)追踪(M = 2.0), t (19) = 3.61, p t [22] = 5.39, p t [22] = 2.87, p t [22] = -3.54, p结论:解决AUDs使用一个集成的移动医疗干预提供循证心理和药物治疗是可行的和可能产生的改进在使用酒精和精神症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信