Increasing effective postpartum care in an obstetric clinic using ACOG's postpartum toolkit.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12831
Kimberly Jones-Beatty, Diana Jolles, Irina Burd, Orlene Thomas
{"title":"Increasing effective postpartum care in an obstetric clinic using ACOG's postpartum toolkit.","authors":"Kimberly Jones-Beatty,&nbsp;Diana Jolles,&nbsp;Irina Burd,&nbsp;Orlene Thomas","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 69% of maternal mortality occurs in the postpartum period. Contributing factors include the absence of preparation of pregnant women for the postpartum period during the antenatal period, postpartum follow-up care not being scheduled until 6 weeks after childbirth, and the lack of further care coordination.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this project was to increase the frequency of effective postpartum care visits to 80% in 8 weeks at an urban obstetric clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quality improvement project was conducted through four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles over 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Postpartum Readiness & Awareness Tools (PRATs) were reviewed with patients during their late third trimester, to review postpartum warning signs that warrant further evaluation. A population health registry was created to manage early follow-up for newly postpartum patients, to ensure their recovery was progressing normally. A note template was created and implemented to guide the completion of comprehensive postpartum visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 8 weeks, 188 patients received 1 of the 3 standardized interventions. Effective postpartum visits increased to 88%. The PRATs increased patient postpartum warning sign knowledge, with a project mean risk factor knowledge score of 6 (Goal = 5). The population health registry drove right care by ensuring early postpartum patients were recovering as expected, as seen by a project mean right-care score of 16 (Goal = 12). The note template increased the effectiveness of postpartum visits, with a mean effective postpartum care score of 10 (Goal = 10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PRATs, population health registry, and note template collectively increased the quality and effectiveness of postpartum care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1614-1620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 69% of maternal mortality occurs in the postpartum period. Contributing factors include the absence of preparation of pregnant women for the postpartum period during the antenatal period, postpartum follow-up care not being scheduled until 6 weeks after childbirth, and the lack of further care coordination.

Aim: The aim of this project was to increase the frequency of effective postpartum care visits to 80% in 8 weeks at an urban obstetric clinic.

Methods: A quality improvement project was conducted through four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles over 8 weeks.

Interventions: Postpartum Readiness & Awareness Tools (PRATs) were reviewed with patients during their late third trimester, to review postpartum warning signs that warrant further evaluation. A population health registry was created to manage early follow-up for newly postpartum patients, to ensure their recovery was progressing normally. A note template was created and implemented to guide the completion of comprehensive postpartum visits.

Results: Over 8 weeks, 188 patients received 1 of the 3 standardized interventions. Effective postpartum visits increased to 88%. The PRATs increased patient postpartum warning sign knowledge, with a project mean risk factor knowledge score of 6 (Goal = 5). The population health registry drove right care by ensuring early postpartum patients were recovering as expected, as seen by a project mean right-care score of 16 (Goal = 12). The note template increased the effectiveness of postpartum visits, with a mean effective postpartum care score of 10 (Goal = 10).

Conclusions: The PRATs, population health registry, and note template collectively increased the quality and effectiveness of postpartum care.

提高有效的产后护理在产科诊所使用ACOG的产后工具包。
背景:大约69%的产妇死亡发生在产后。造成这种情况的因素包括孕妇在产前期间没有为产后做好准备,产后随访护理直到分娩后6周才安排,以及缺乏进一步的护理协调。目的:该项目的目的是将城市产科诊所8周内的有效产后护理就诊频率提高到80%。方法:在8周的时间内,通过四个计划-执行-研究-行动周期进行质量改进项目。干预措施:产后准备和意识工具(PRATs)与患者在晚期妊娠晚期进行审查,以审查产后警告信号,需要进一步评估。建立了人口健康登记处,以便对产后新患者进行早期随访,确保她们的康复正常进行。创建并实施了一个笔记模板,以指导完成全面的产后访问。结果:在8周内,188例患者接受了3种标准化干预措施中的1种。有效的产后访问增加到88%。PRATs增加了患者对产后警告信号的了解,项目平均危险因素知识得分为6分(目标= 5)。人口健康登记通过确保早期产后患者按预期恢复来推动正确护理,正如项目平均正确护理得分为16(目标= 12)所见。笔记模板提高了产后访问的有效性,平均有效产后护理得分为10分(目标= 10)。结论:PRATs、人口健康登记和病历模板共同提高了产后护理的质量和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NURSING FORUM
NURSING FORUM NURSING-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信