Changes in pulmonary mechanics from supine to prone position measured through esophageal manometry in critically ill patients with COVID-19 severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
{"title":"Changes in pulmonary mechanics from supine to prone position measured through esophageal manometry in critically ill patients with COVID-19 severe acute respiratory distress syndrome","authors":"Ismael Maldonado-Beltrán , Martín Armando Ríos-Ayala , Iván Armando Osuna-Padilla , Nadia Carolina Rodríguez-Moguel , Gustavo Lugo-Goytia , Carmen Margarita Hernández-Cárdenas","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2023.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe changes in pulmonary mechanics<span><span> when changing from supine position (SP) to </span>prone position<span> (PP) in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to severe COVID-19.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Intensive Care Unit of the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (Mexico City).</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>COVID-19 patients on MV due to ARDS, with criteria for PP.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p><span>Measurement of pulmonary mechanics in patients on SP to PP, using esophageal </span>manometry.</p></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><p>Changes in lung and thoracic wall mechanics in SP and PP</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen patients were included. Changes during first prone positioning were reported. Reductions in lung stress (10.6 vs 7.7, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02), lung strain (0.74 vs 0.57, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02), lung elastance (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01), chest wall elastance (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003) and relation of respiratory system elastances (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) were observed between patients when changing from SP to PP. No differences were observed in driving pressure (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <span>0.19) and transpulmonary pressure during inspiration (p</span> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.70).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Changes in pulmonary mechanics were observed when patients were comparing values of supine position with measurements obtained 24<!--> <span>h after prone positioning. Esophageal pressure monitoring may facilitate ventilator management despite patient positioning.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"48 7","pages":"Pages 386-391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572723001364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To describe changes in pulmonary mechanics when changing from supine position (SP) to prone position (PP) in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to severe COVID-19.
Design
Retrospective cohort.
Setting
Intensive Care Unit of the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (Mexico City).
Patients
COVID-19 patients on MV due to ARDS, with criteria for PP.
Intervention
Measurement of pulmonary mechanics in patients on SP to PP, using esophageal manometry.
Main variables of interest
Changes in lung and thoracic wall mechanics in SP and PP
Results
Nineteen patients were included. Changes during first prone positioning were reported. Reductions in lung stress (10.6 vs 7.7, p = 0.02), lung strain (0.74 vs 0.57, p = 0.02), lung elastance (p = 0.01), chest wall elastance (p = 0.003) and relation of respiratory system elastances (p = 0.001) were observed between patients when changing from SP to PP. No differences were observed in driving pressure (p = 0.19) and transpulmonary pressure during inspiration (p = 0.70).
Conclusions
Changes in pulmonary mechanics were observed when patients were comparing values of supine position with measurements obtained 24 h after prone positioning. Esophageal pressure monitoring may facilitate ventilator management despite patient positioning.