Morphometric Analysis of Prostate Zonal Anatomy After Transurethral Resection of Prostate and Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Pilot Study.
Abhishek Bhat, Jonathan E Katz, Vedant K Acharya, Khushi Shah, Ruben Blachman Braun, Nicholas Anthony Smith, R Patricia Castillo, Hemendra N Shah
{"title":"Morphometric Analysis of Prostate Zonal Anatomy After Transurethral Resection of Prostate and Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Abhishek Bhat, Jonathan E Katz, Vedant K Acharya, Khushi Shah, Ruben Blachman Braun, Nicholas Anthony Smith, R Patricia Castillo, Hemendra N Shah","doi":"10.5152/tud.2022.21326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary purpose was to compare the completeness of adenomectomy and zonal anatomy of prostate on magnetic resonance imaging prostate after transurethral resection of prostate and Holmium enucleation of prostate. The secondary purpose was to investigate the relationship between preoperative total prostate volume and postoperative transition zone and peripheral zone volume after both procedures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all patients who underwent transurethral resection of pros- tate or Holmium enucleation of prostate over 3 years (2017-2020) and had at least 1 postoperative magnetic resonance imaging prostate was performed. Volume estimations of the prostate and individual zones were per- formed, and statistical comparisons were made to evaluate morphometric changes between the 2 procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 patients (mean age, 71.8 years) underwent transurethral resection of prostate and 12 patients (mean age, 66.9 years) underwent Holmium enucleation of prostate. The median pre-operative prostate volume in the Holmium enucleation of prostate group was higher than the transurethral resection of prostate group (101.5 g vs. 62 g; P =.102). However, there was a significant difference in the resected tissue weight favoring Holmium enucleation of prostate over transurethral resection of prostate (P value=.004). The postoperative transition zone and peripheral zone volume as calculated by magnetic resonance imaging remained relatively constant in both procedures. The peripheral zone volume on postoperative magnetic res- onance imaging was found to be independent of transition zone volume even for very large-sized prostates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A well-performed transurethral resection of prostate or Holmium enucleation of prostate cannearly completely eliminate the transition zone volume, irrespective of the size of the prostate as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging prostate. Additionally, the peripheral zone volume is consistent across the entire spectrum of the prostate size.</p>","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.21326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The primary purpose was to compare the completeness of adenomectomy and zonal anatomy of prostate on magnetic resonance imaging prostate after transurethral resection of prostate and Holmium enucleation of prostate. The secondary purpose was to investigate the relationship between preoperative total prostate volume and postoperative transition zone and peripheral zone volume after both procedures.
Material and methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent transurethral resection of pros- tate or Holmium enucleation of prostate over 3 years (2017-2020) and had at least 1 postoperative magnetic resonance imaging prostate was performed. Volume estimations of the prostate and individual zones were per- formed, and statistical comparisons were made to evaluate morphometric changes between the 2 procedures.
Results: A total of 9 patients (mean age, 71.8 years) underwent transurethral resection of prostate and 12 patients (mean age, 66.9 years) underwent Holmium enucleation of prostate. The median pre-operative prostate volume in the Holmium enucleation of prostate group was higher than the transurethral resection of prostate group (101.5 g vs. 62 g; P =.102). However, there was a significant difference in the resected tissue weight favoring Holmium enucleation of prostate over transurethral resection of prostate (P value=.004). The postoperative transition zone and peripheral zone volume as calculated by magnetic resonance imaging remained relatively constant in both procedures. The peripheral zone volume on postoperative magnetic res- onance imaging was found to be independent of transition zone volume even for very large-sized prostates.
Conclusion: A well-performed transurethral resection of prostate or Holmium enucleation of prostate cannearly completely eliminate the transition zone volume, irrespective of the size of the prostate as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging prostate. Additionally, the peripheral zone volume is consistent across the entire spectrum of the prostate size.
目的:比较经尿道前列腺切除术和钬切除术后磁共振成像前列腺的完整性和前列腺分区解剖。次要目的是探讨术前前列腺总体积与两种手术后过渡区和外周区体积的关系。材料和方法:回顾性分析3年内(2017-2020年)所有经尿道前列腺癌切除或钬切除术且术后至少进行1次前列腺磁共振成像的患者。对前列腺和个别区域进行体积估计,并进行统计比较,以评估两种手术之间的形态学变化。结果:9例患者(平均年龄71.8岁)行经尿道前列腺切除术,12例患者(平均年龄66.9岁)行前列腺钬切除术。前列腺钬切除术组术前前列腺体积中位数高于经尿道前列腺切除术组(101.5 g vs 62 g;P = .102)。然而,经尿道前列腺切除术与钬切除术在切除组织重量上有显著差异(P值= 0.004)。磁共振成像计算的术后过渡区和外周区体积在两种手术中保持相对恒定。即使对于非常大的前列腺,术后磁共振成像的外周区体积也与过渡区体积无关。结论:经尿道前列腺切除术或钬切除前列腺核几乎可以完全消除过渡区体积,与前列腺磁共振成像证实的前列腺大小无关。此外,外周区体积在整个前列腺大小范围内是一致的。
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.