Challenges and Strategies for Patient Safety in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Christina T Yuan, Sydney M Dy, Alden Yuanhong Lai, Tyler Oberlander, Susan M Hannum, Elyse C Lasser, JaAlah-Ai Heughan, Vadim Dukhanin, Hadi Kharrazi, Julia M Kim, Ayse P Gurses, Mark Bittle, Sarah H Scholle, Jill A Marsteller
{"title":"Challenges and Strategies for Patient Safety in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Christina T Yuan,&nbsp;Sydney M Dy,&nbsp;Alden Yuanhong Lai,&nbsp;Tyler Oberlander,&nbsp;Susan M Hannum,&nbsp;Elyse C Lasser,&nbsp;JaAlah-Ai Heughan,&nbsp;Vadim Dukhanin,&nbsp;Hadi Kharrazi,&nbsp;Julia M Kim,&nbsp;Ayse P Gurses,&nbsp;Mark Bittle,&nbsp;Sarah H Scholle,&nbsp;Jill A Marsteller","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although most health care occurs in the ambulatory setting, limited research examines how providers and patients think about and enact ambulatory patient safety. This multimethod qualitative study seeks to identify perceived challenges and strategies to improve ambulatory safety from the perspectives of clinicians, staff, and patients. Data included interviews (N = 101), focus groups (N = 65), and observations of safety processes (N = 79) collected from 10 patient-centered medical homes. Key safety issues included the lack of interoperability among health information systems, clinician-patient communication failures, and challenges with medication reconciliation. Commonly cited safety strategies leveraged health information systems or involved dedicated resources (eg, providing access to social workers). Patients also identified strategies not mentioned by clinicians, emphasizing the need for their involvement in developing safety solutions. This work provides insight into safety issues of greatest concern to clinicians, staff, and patients and strategies to improve safety in the ambulatory setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":7539,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Quality","volume":"37 5","pages":"379-387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9700196/pdf/nihms-1851889.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although most health care occurs in the ambulatory setting, limited research examines how providers and patients think about and enact ambulatory patient safety. This multimethod qualitative study seeks to identify perceived challenges and strategies to improve ambulatory safety from the perspectives of clinicians, staff, and patients. Data included interviews (N = 101), focus groups (N = 65), and observations of safety processes (N = 79) collected from 10 patient-centered medical homes. Key safety issues included the lack of interoperability among health information systems, clinician-patient communication failures, and challenges with medication reconciliation. Commonly cited safety strategies leveraged health information systems or involved dedicated resources (eg, providing access to social workers). Patients also identified strategies not mentioned by clinicians, emphasizing the need for their involvement in developing safety solutions. This work provides insight into safety issues of greatest concern to clinicians, staff, and patients and strategies to improve safety in the ambulatory setting.

初级保健患者安全的挑战和策略:一项定性研究。
尽管大多数医疗保健发生在门诊环境中,有限的研究调查了提供者和患者如何考虑和制定门诊患者安全。本多方法定性研究旨在从临床医生、工作人员和患者的角度确定可感知的挑战和改善门诊安全的策略。数据包括访谈(N = 101)、焦点小组(N = 65)和安全过程观察(N = 79),这些数据来自10个以患者为中心的医疗之家。关键的安全问题包括卫生信息系统之间缺乏互操作性,临床与患者沟通失败,以及药物协调方面的挑战。通常引用的安全策略利用卫生信息系统或涉及专用资源(例如,为社会工作者提供接触渠道)。患者还确定了临床医生未提及的策略,强调了他们参与制定安全解决方案的必要性。这项工作为临床医生、工作人员和患者最关心的安全问题以及提高门诊安全的策略提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Quality (AJMQ) is focused on keeping readers informed of the resources, processes, and perspectives contributing to quality health care services. This peer-reviewed journal presents a forum for the exchange of ideas, strategies, and methods in improving the delivery and management of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信