Implicit Assessment of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: Group Differences in Temporal Stability of the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT).

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Archives of Suicide Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1080/13811118.2023.2247042
Stephanie Jarvi Steele, Thröstur Björgvinsson, Lance P Swenson
{"title":"Implicit Assessment of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: Group Differences in Temporal Stability of the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT).","authors":"Stephanie Jarvi Steele, Thröstur Björgvinsson, Lance P Swenson","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2023.2247042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examine differences on the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT) by history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), in a test-retest design, to examine short-term temporal stability of SI-IAT scores.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Treatment-seeking participants (<i>N</i> = 113; 58% female; 89% White; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 30.57) completed the SI-IAT and self-report measures at two time points (<i>M</i><sub>Timeframe</sub> = 3.8 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data suggested NSSI (51% of the sample endorsed lifetime NSSI) was related to Time 1 (T1) identity and attitude, and affected stability of scores. T1 and T2 SI-IAT identity and attitude were more strongly related for participants with NSSI history. NSSI characteristics (recency; number of methods) affected stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The short-term test-retest reliability of the SI-IAT is strong among those with NSSI history from T1 to T2. However, the SI-IATs use with participants without a history of NSSI was not supported beyond its established ability to differentiate between groups by NSSI history. This test may provide clinically-relevant assessment among those with a history of NSSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10873468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2023.2247042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We examine differences on the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT) by history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), in a test-retest design, to examine short-term temporal stability of SI-IAT scores.

Method: Treatment-seeking participants (N = 113; 58% female; 89% White; Mage = 30.57) completed the SI-IAT and self-report measures at two time points (MTimeframe = 3.8 days).

Results: Data suggested NSSI (51% of the sample endorsed lifetime NSSI) was related to Time 1 (T1) identity and attitude, and affected stability of scores. T1 and T2 SI-IAT identity and attitude were more strongly related for participants with NSSI history. NSSI characteristics (recency; number of methods) affected stability.

Conclusions: The short-term test-retest reliability of the SI-IAT is strong among those with NSSI history from T1 to T2. However, the SI-IATs use with participants without a history of NSSI was not supported beyond its established ability to differentiate between groups by NSSI history. This test may provide clinically-relevant assessment among those with a history of NSSI.

非自杀性自伤的内隐评估:自伤内隐联想测验(SI-IAT)时间稳定性的群体差异。
目的:我们通过测试-再测试设计来研究非自杀性自伤(NSSI)史在自伤内隐联想测验(SI-IAT)上的差异,从而研究 SI-IAT 分数的短期时间稳定性:寻求治疗的参与者(N = 113;58% 女性;89% 白人;Mage = 30.57)在两个时间点(MTimeframe = 3.8 天)完成 SI-IAT 和自我报告测量:数据显示,NSSI(51% 的样本认可终生 NSSI)与时间 1(T1)的身份和态度有关,并影响分数的稳定性。对于有 NSSI 历史的参与者来说,T1 和 T2 SI-IAT 的认同和态度关系更为密切。NSSI的特征(发生频率、方法数量)会影响稳定性:从 T1 到 T2,SI-IAT 在有 NSSI 史的参与者中的短期测试-重测可靠性很高。但是,SI-IAT 除了具有按 NSSI 史区分不同组别的既定能力外,在无 NSSI 史的参与者中的使用没有得到支持。该测试可为有 NSSI 史的人群提供临床相关的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信