Percutaneous nephrostomy in Ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poorly functioning kidney: Is it still pertinent in adults?

IF 1 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Uday Pratap Singh, Shitangsu Kakoti, Sanjoy Kumar Sureka, Nayab Danish, Abhay Kumar, Zain Tamboli, Madhur Anand, Aneesh Srivastava
{"title":"Percutaneous nephrostomy in Ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poorly functioning kidney: Is it still pertinent in adults?","authors":"Uday Pratap Singh,&nbsp;Shitangsu Kakoti,&nbsp;Sanjoy Kumar Sureka,&nbsp;Nayab Danish,&nbsp;Abhay Kumar,&nbsp;Zain Tamboli,&nbsp;Madhur Anand,&nbsp;Aneesh Srivastava","doi":"10.5152/tud.2022.22050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the pertinence of percutaneous nephrostomy drainage in adult patients of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poorly functioning kidneys (<20% split renal function). Material and methods: Clinical records of all patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poorly functioning kidneys who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy drainage in our institute between February 2015 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to their split renal function obtained from the Tc-99m ethylenedicysteine diuretic renogram. Group I consisted of all patients having split renal function ≤5%, group II with split renal function 6-10%, group III with split renal function 11-15%, and finally group IV with split renal function 16-20%. Those patients in whom split renal function was improved by >10% and had daily percutaneous nephrostomy output >400 mL, underwent pyeloplasty and the rest underwent nephrectomy. Results: Seventy-two patients were studied, out of which 5 were in group I, 20 in groups II and III each, and 27 in group IV. The mean age of presentation was 34.4 ± 14 years. The split renal function improvement of >10% was seen in 55 patients (76.4%) after percutaneous nephrostomy drainage (P < .05). Pyeloplasty was done in 40 patients (55.6%) and nephrectomy was done in 32 patients (44.4%). Conclusion: In conclusion, we recommend the use of a Tc-99m ethylenedicysteine scan for estimation of split renal function during the initial presentation in every patient followed by reconstructive surgery if split renal function is above 15% and nephrectomy if it is below 5%. The trial of percutaneous nephrostomy is pertinent if split renal function is between 6% and 15%.","PeriodicalId":23366,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9730265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.22050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the pertinence of percutaneous nephrostomy drainage in adult patients of primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poorly functioning kidneys (<20% split renal function). Material and methods: Clinical records of all patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction with poorly functioning kidneys who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy drainage in our institute between February 2015 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to their split renal function obtained from the Tc-99m ethylenedicysteine diuretic renogram. Group I consisted of all patients having split renal function ≤5%, group II with split renal function 6-10%, group III with split renal function 11-15%, and finally group IV with split renal function 16-20%. Those patients in whom split renal function was improved by >10% and had daily percutaneous nephrostomy output >400 mL, underwent pyeloplasty and the rest underwent nephrectomy. Results: Seventy-two patients were studied, out of which 5 were in group I, 20 in groups II and III each, and 27 in group IV. The mean age of presentation was 34.4 ± 14 years. The split renal function improvement of >10% was seen in 55 patients (76.4%) after percutaneous nephrostomy drainage (P < .05). Pyeloplasty was done in 40 patients (55.6%) and nephrectomy was done in 32 patients (44.4%). Conclusion: In conclusion, we recommend the use of a Tc-99m ethylenedicysteine scan for estimation of split renal function during the initial presentation in every patient followed by reconstructive surgery if split renal function is above 15% and nephrectomy if it is below 5%. The trial of percutaneous nephrostomy is pertinent if split renal function is between 6% and 15%.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经皮肾造口术治疗肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻伴肾功能不全:是否仍适用于成人?
目的:探讨经皮肾造瘘引流治疗原发性肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻合并肾功能不全的成人患者的相关性。(材料与方法:回顾性分析我院2015年2月至2020年1月间所有经皮肾造瘘引流治疗原发性肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻合并肾功能不全的患者的临床资料。根据Tc-99m乙炔半胱氨酸利尿肾图显示的分裂肾功能将患者分为4组。I组为所有肾功能分裂≤5%的患者,II组为肾功能分裂6-10%,piii组为肾功能分裂11-15%,最后IV组为肾功能分裂16-20%。劈裂肾功能改善>10%且每日经皮肾造口量>400 mL的患者行肾盂成形术,其余患者行肾切除术。结果:共纳入72例患者,其中ⅰ组5例,ⅱ组、ⅲ组各20例,ⅳ组27例,平均发病年龄34.4±14岁。经皮肾造口引流术后,裂肾功能改善>10%的患者有55例(76.4%)(P < 0.05)。40例(55.6%)患者行肾盂成形术,32例(44.4%)患者行肾切除术。结论:总之,我们建议在所有患者首次出现时使用Tc-99m乙基半胱氨酸扫描来评估肾功能分裂,如果肾功能分裂高于15%,则进行重建手术,如果肾功能分裂低于5%,则进行肾切除术。如果分裂肾功能在6% - 15%之间,则应进行经皮肾造口术的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish journal of urology
Turkish journal of urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The aim of the Turkish Journal of Urology is to contribute to the literature by publishing scientifically high-quality research articles as well as reviews, editorials, letters to the editor and case reports. The journal’s target audience includes, urology specialists, medical specialty fellows and other specialists and practitioners who are interested in the field of urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信