Capsule endoscopy in Crohn's disease surveillance: A monocentric, retrospective analysis in Italy.

Frontiers in Medical Technology Pub Date : 2022-11-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2022.1038087
Carlo Calabrese, Dania Gelli, Fernando Rizzello, Paolo Gionchetti, Rafael Torrejon Torres, Rhodri Saunders, Jason Davis
{"title":"Capsule endoscopy in Crohn's disease surveillance: A monocentric, retrospective analysis in Italy.","authors":"Carlo Calabrese, Dania Gelli, Fernando Rizzello, Paolo Gionchetti, Rafael Torrejon Torres, Rhodri Saunders, Jason Davis","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2022.1038087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Crohn's disease (CD) is a potentially debilitating condition that burdens Italian healthcare substantially. The symptomatic management relies on prompt therapy adjustment to reduce flares and follow-up diagnostic inputs to maximise remission. Capsule endoscopy (CE) has introduced advantages in CD diagnostics, allowing the direct inspection of the entire gastrointestinal mucosa. The diagnostic procedure is comparable in effort to standard ileocolonoscopy (IC) but requires no anaesthesia. Whether CE follow-up improves clinical outcomes remains to be defined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To provide a preliminary evaluation of CE in terms of clinical outcomes with respect to the standard of care ileocolonoscopy/MRE in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis utilises anonymised, monocentric data from the S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital IBD database in Bologna, Italy, collected between 1999 and 2019. Out of 421 adult patient records, 100 were included in the analysis (50 per arm, matched per demographic and clinical characteristics). The CE represented the intervention arm, whereas ileocolonoscopy/magnetic resonance enterography was the standard of care. The use of biologics, symptomatology course, and surgery were the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two techniques performed similarly overall. In general, no significant difference emerged in the use of biologics. The use of biologics appears reduced in the CE group, only in L4 patients after the first follow-up year. Similarly, surgery was seemingly less frequent among L4 patients in the CE group. No difference was found between groups in flare occurrence and duration. CE patients might have experienced longer and earlier first remissions, but no long-term difference persisted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CE group showed an apparent reduction in biologics and surgery, limiting to L4 diagnoses. More extensive, prospective, multicentre, randomised studies must corroborate these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12599,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1038087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2022.1038087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Crohn's disease (CD) is a potentially debilitating condition that burdens Italian healthcare substantially. The symptomatic management relies on prompt therapy adjustment to reduce flares and follow-up diagnostic inputs to maximise remission. Capsule endoscopy (CE) has introduced advantages in CD diagnostics, allowing the direct inspection of the entire gastrointestinal mucosa. The diagnostic procedure is comparable in effort to standard ileocolonoscopy (IC) but requires no anaesthesia. Whether CE follow-up improves clinical outcomes remains to be defined.

Objectives: To provide a preliminary evaluation of CE in terms of clinical outcomes with respect to the standard of care ileocolonoscopy/MRE in Italy.

Methods: This retrospective analysis utilises anonymised, monocentric data from the S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital IBD database in Bologna, Italy, collected between 1999 and 2019. Out of 421 adult patient records, 100 were included in the analysis (50 per arm, matched per demographic and clinical characteristics). The CE represented the intervention arm, whereas ileocolonoscopy/magnetic resonance enterography was the standard of care. The use of biologics, symptomatology course, and surgery were the outcomes.

Results: The two techniques performed similarly overall. In general, no significant difference emerged in the use of biologics. The use of biologics appears reduced in the CE group, only in L4 patients after the first follow-up year. Similarly, surgery was seemingly less frequent among L4 patients in the CE group. No difference was found between groups in flare occurrence and duration. CE patients might have experienced longer and earlier first remissions, but no long-term difference persisted.

Conclusions: The CE group showed an apparent reduction in biologics and surgery, limiting to L4 diagnoses. More extensive, prospective, multicentre, randomised studies must corroborate these preliminary findings.

克罗恩病监测中的胶囊内镜检查:意大利的单中心回顾性分析。
背景:克罗恩病(CD克罗恩病(CD)是一种可能使人衰弱的疾病,给意大利的医疗保健造成了沉重负担。对症治疗依赖于及时调整治疗方案以减少复发,以及后续诊断投入以最大限度地缓解病情。胶囊内窥镜(CE)为胃肠病诊断带来了优势,可直接检查整个胃肠道粘膜。该诊断程序的工作量与标准回肠结肠镜检查(IC)相当,但无需麻醉。CE随访是否能改善临床效果仍有待确定:方法:本回顾性分析采用了在意大利进行的无记名回肠结肠镜检查结果:这项回顾性分析采用了意大利博洛尼亚 S. Orsola-Malpighi 医院 IBD 数据库中 1999 年至 2019 年期间收集的匿名单中心数据。在 421 份成人病历中,有 100 份被纳入分析(每组 50 份,人口统计学和临床特征匹配)。CE代表干预组,而回结肠镜/磁共振肠造影则是标准护理组。结果显示了生物制剂的使用、症状病程和手术情况:结果:两种技术的总体表现相似。总的来说,生物制剂的使用没有明显差异。在 CE 组中,生物制剂的使用似乎减少了,但只有 L4 患者在第一年随访后减少了生物制剂的使用。同样,CE 组 L4 患者的手术频率似乎也较低。在复发发生率和持续时间方面,各组之间没有发现差异。CE组患者的首次缓解时间可能更长、更早,但长期差异并不存在:CE组的生物制剂和手术明显减少,但仅限于L4诊断。更广泛的前瞻性多中心随机研究必须证实这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信