Utility of fusion imaging for the evaluation of ultrasound quality in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-15 DOI:10.14366/usg.23106
Yeun-Yoon Kim, Seo-Bum Cho, Jae Seung Lee, Hye Won Lee, Jin-Young Choi, Seung Up Kim
{"title":"Utility of fusion imaging for the evaluation of ultrasound quality in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance.","authors":"Yeun-Yoon Kim,&nbsp;Seo-Bum Cho,&nbsp;Jae Seung Lee,&nbsp;Hye Won Lee,&nbsp;Jin-Young Choi,&nbsp;Seung Up Kim","doi":"10.14366/usg.23106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the quality of surveillance ultrasound (US) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) utilizing fusion imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research involved a secondary analysis of a prospectively recruited cohort. Under institutional review board approval, participants referred for surveillance US who had undergone liver computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within the past year were screened between August 2022 and January 2023. After patient consent was obtained, the US visualization score in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System was assessed with fusion imaging at the time of examination. This score was compared to that of conventional US using the extended McNemar test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with a US visualization score of B or C. Factors limiting visualization of focal lesions were recorded during fusion imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 105 participants (mean age, 59±11 years; 66 men), US visualization scores of B and C were assigned to 57 (54.3%) and 17 (16.2%) participants, respectively, by conventional US and 54 (51.4%) and 32 (30.5%) participants, respectively, by fusion imaging. The score distribution differed significantly between methods (P=0.010). Male sex was independently associated with US visualization scores of B or C (adjusted odds ratio, 3.73 [95% confidence interval, 1.30 to 10.76]; P=0.015). The most common reason (64.5%) for lesion nondetection was a limited sonic window.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conventional US may underestimate the limitations of the sonic window relative to real-time fusion imaging with pre-acquired CT or MRI in the surveillance of HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/25/37/usg-23106.PMC10555691.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.23106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the quality of surveillance ultrasound (US) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) utilizing fusion imaging.

Methods: This research involved a secondary analysis of a prospectively recruited cohort. Under institutional review board approval, participants referred for surveillance US who had undergone liver computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within the past year were screened between August 2022 and January 2023. After patient consent was obtained, the US visualization score in the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System was assessed with fusion imaging at the time of examination. This score was compared to that of conventional US using the extended McNemar test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with a US visualization score of B or C. Factors limiting visualization of focal lesions were recorded during fusion imaging.

Results: Among the 105 participants (mean age, 59±11 years; 66 men), US visualization scores of B and C were assigned to 57 (54.3%) and 17 (16.2%) participants, respectively, by conventional US and 54 (51.4%) and 32 (30.5%) participants, respectively, by fusion imaging. The score distribution differed significantly between methods (P=0.010). Male sex was independently associated with US visualization scores of B or C (adjusted odds ratio, 3.73 [95% confidence interval, 1.30 to 10.76]; P=0.015). The most common reason (64.5%) for lesion nondetection was a limited sonic window.

Conclusion: Conventional US may underestimate the limitations of the sonic window relative to real-time fusion imaging with pre-acquired CT or MRI in the surveillance of HCC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

融合成像在肝细胞癌监测超声质量评估中的应用。
目的:本研究评估了利用融合成像监测超声(US)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的质量。方法:本研究对一个前瞻性招募的队列进行了二次分析。根据机构审查委员会的批准,在2022年8月至2023年1月期间,对在过去一年内接受过肝脏计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)的美国监测参与者进行了筛查。在获得患者同意后,在检查时用融合成像评估肝脏成像报告和数据系统中的US可视化评分。使用扩展的McNemar测试将该分数与传统美国的分数进行比较。使用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与US可视化评分B或C独立相关的因素。在融合成像期间记录限制局灶性病变可视化的因素。结果:在105名参与者(平均年龄59±11岁;66名男性)中,常规超声将B和C的US可视化评分分别分配给57名(54.3%)和17名(16.2%)参与者,融合成像将B和C的US可视化得分分别分配给54名(51.4%)和32名(30.5%)参与者。不同方法的评分分布有显著差异(P=0.010)。男性与B或C的US可视化评分独立相关(调整后的比值比为3.73[95%置信区间,1.30至10.76];P=0.015)。病变未检测的最常见原因(64.5%)是声窗有限。结论:在HCC的监测中,常规超声可能低估了声窗相对于预先获得的CT或MRI实时融合成像的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信