Epistemic racism in the health professions: A qualitative study with Black women in Canada.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-07 DOI:10.1177/13634593221141605
Brenda L Beagan, Stephanie R Bizzeth, Kaitlin R Sibbald, Josephine B Etowa
{"title":"Epistemic racism in the health professions: A qualitative study with Black women in Canada.","authors":"Brenda L Beagan, Stephanie R Bizzeth, Kaitlin R Sibbald, Josephine B Etowa","doi":"10.1177/13634593221141605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systemic racism within health care is increasingly garnering critical attention, but to date attention to the racism experienced by health professionals themselves has been scant. In Canada, anti-Black racism may be embodied in structures, policies, institutional practices and interpersonal interactions. Epistemic racism is an aspect of systemic racism wherein the knowledge claims, ways of knowing and 'knowers' themselves are constructed as invalid, or less credible. This critical interpretive qualitative study examined the experiences of epistemic racism among 13 healthcare professionals across Canada who self-identified as Black women. It explores the ways knowledge claims and expert authority are discredited and undermined, despite the attainment of professional credentials. Three themes were identified: 1. Not being perceived or portrayed as credible health professionals; 2. Requiring invisible labour to counter professional credibility 'deficit'; and 3. Devaluing knowledge while imposing stereotypes. The Black women in our study faced routine epistemic racism. They were not afforded the position of legitimate knower, expert, authority, despite their professional credentials as physicians, nurses and occupational therapists. Their embodied cultural and community knowledges were disregarded in favour of stereotyped assumptions. Adopting the professional comportment of 'Whiteness' was one way these health care providers strived to be perceived as credible professionals. Their experiences are characteristic of 'misogynoir', a particular form of racism directed at Black women. Anti-Black epistemic racism constitutes one way Whiteness is perpetuated in health professions institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"203-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593221141605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systemic racism within health care is increasingly garnering critical attention, but to date attention to the racism experienced by health professionals themselves has been scant. In Canada, anti-Black racism may be embodied in structures, policies, institutional practices and interpersonal interactions. Epistemic racism is an aspect of systemic racism wherein the knowledge claims, ways of knowing and 'knowers' themselves are constructed as invalid, or less credible. This critical interpretive qualitative study examined the experiences of epistemic racism among 13 healthcare professionals across Canada who self-identified as Black women. It explores the ways knowledge claims and expert authority are discredited and undermined, despite the attainment of professional credentials. Three themes were identified: 1. Not being perceived or portrayed as credible health professionals; 2. Requiring invisible labour to counter professional credibility 'deficit'; and 3. Devaluing knowledge while imposing stereotypes. The Black women in our study faced routine epistemic racism. They were not afforded the position of legitimate knower, expert, authority, despite their professional credentials as physicians, nurses and occupational therapists. Their embodied cultural and community knowledges were disregarded in favour of stereotyped assumptions. Adopting the professional comportment of 'Whiteness' was one way these health care providers strived to be perceived as credible professionals. Their experiences are characteristic of 'misogynoir', a particular form of racism directed at Black women. Anti-Black epistemic racism constitutes one way Whiteness is perpetuated in health professions institutions.

卫生专业中的认识论种族主义:对加拿大黑人妇女的定性研究。
医疗保健领域的系统性种族主义正日益引起批判性关注,但迄今为止,对医疗保健专业人员自身所经历的种族主义的关注还很少。在加拿大,反黑人的种族主义可能体现在结构、政策、机构做法和人际交往中。认识上的种族主义是系统性种族主义的一个方面,其中知识主张、认识方式和 "认识者 "本身被构建为无效或可信度较低。这项批判性解释定性研究考察了加拿大 13 名自我认同为黑人女性的医疗保健专业人员的认识种族主义经历。研究探讨了尽管获得了专业资格证书,但知识主张和专家权威如何被抹黑和削弱。研究确定了三个主题:1.不被视为或描绘成可信的医疗专业人员;2. 需要无形的劳动来弥补专业可信度的 "赤字";以及 3.贬低知识价值,同时强加刻板印象。在我们的研究中,黑人妇女面临着例行的认识种族主义。尽管她们拥有医生、护士和职业治疗师的专业资格证书,但她们并没有获得合法的知识者、专家和权威的地位。她们所体现的文化和社区知识被忽视,而被陈规定型的假设所取代。采用 "白化 "的专业举止是这些医疗服务提供者努力被视为可信专业人员的一种方式。她们的经历是 "厌恶女性"(misogynoir)的特征,这是一种针对黑人女性的特殊形式的种族主义。反黑人的认识论种族主义是白种人在医疗专业机构中延续的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health
Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信