Association of the magnitude of the difference in blood pressure between office and ambulatory measurements with blood pressure variability in untreated individuals.

IF 2.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Yea Je Lee, Moo-Yong Rhee, Je Sang Kim, Ungjeong Do, Ji-Hyun Kim, Byong-Kyu Kim, Hae-Young Kim
{"title":"Association of the magnitude of the difference in blood pressure between office and ambulatory measurements with blood pressure variability in untreated individuals.","authors":"Yea Je Lee,&nbsp;Moo-Yong Rhee,&nbsp;Je Sang Kim,&nbsp;Ungjeong Do,&nbsp;Ji-Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Byong-Kyu Kim,&nbsp;Hae-Young Kim","doi":"10.1186/s40885-022-00220-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the association between cardiovascular risk factors and the magnitude of the difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between office and ambulatory measurements (masked effect) in untreated individuals without apparent hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The inclusion criteria were 1) age ≥ 20 years, 2) blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg at the outpatient clinic, and 3) not receiving antihypertensive medications. The difference between office and ambulatory SBP was calculated by subtracting the ambulatory daytime SBP from the office SBP. The association between the masked effect and SBP variability was analyzed in individuals without HMOD (no electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, spot urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio < 30 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, n = 296).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the cardiovascular risk factors, ambulatory BP variability was significantly correlated with the SBP difference. The standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (cv) of 24-h SBP exhibited a significant negative linear association with the SBP difference in univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes, and 24-h ambulatory SBP. A significant association was observed in patients with ambulatory daytime hypertension. In the multivariate analysis, individuals with a negative SBP difference > -5 mmHg exhibited a higher SD and cv of 24-h SBP than those with a negative SBP difference ≤ -5 mmHg or a positive SBP difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of our study suggest that the magnitude of the negative difference in office and ambulatory SBP may be a potential risk factor, even in individuals without apparent HMOD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03855605 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"28 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-022-00220-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the association between cardiovascular risk factors and the magnitude of the difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between office and ambulatory measurements (masked effect) in untreated individuals without apparent hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD).

Methods: The inclusion criteria were 1) age ≥ 20 years, 2) blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg at the outpatient clinic, and 3) not receiving antihypertensive medications. The difference between office and ambulatory SBP was calculated by subtracting the ambulatory daytime SBP from the office SBP. The association between the masked effect and SBP variability was analyzed in individuals without HMOD (no electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, spot urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio < 30 mg/g, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 296).

Results: Among the cardiovascular risk factors, ambulatory BP variability was significantly correlated with the SBP difference. The standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (cv) of 24-h SBP exhibited a significant negative linear association with the SBP difference in univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, sex, presence of diabetes, and 24-h ambulatory SBP. A significant association was observed in patients with ambulatory daytime hypertension. In the multivariate analysis, individuals with a negative SBP difference > -5 mmHg exhibited a higher SD and cv of 24-h SBP than those with a negative SBP difference ≤ -5 mmHg or a positive SBP difference.

Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that the magnitude of the negative difference in office and ambulatory SBP may be a potential risk factor, even in individuals without apparent HMOD.

Trial registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03855605 ).

Abstract Image

办公室和门诊测量血压差异的大小与未治疗个体血压变异性的关系。
目的:我们评估在没有明显高血压介导的器官损伤(HMOD)的未经治疗的个体中,心血管危险因素与办公室和门诊测量的收缩压(SBP)差异幅度(掩盖效应)之间的关系。方法:纳入标准为:1)年龄≥20岁,2)门诊血压≥140/90 mmHg, 3)未接受降压药物治疗。办公室收缩压和日间收缩压的差值是通过办公室收缩压减去日间收缩压来计算的。在没有HMOD的个体(无心电图左心室肥厚,斑点尿白蛋白与肌酐比值2,n = 296)中分析掩盖效应与收缩压变异性之间的关系。结果:在心血管危险因素中,动态血压变异性与收缩压差异显著相关。在单因素和多因素分析中,24小时收缩压的标准差(SD)和变异系数(cv)与年龄、性别、是否患有糖尿病和24小时动态收缩压的差异呈显著的负线性相关。在日间日间高血压患者中观察到显著的相关性。在多变量分析中,收缩压负差> -5 mmHg的个体的24小时收缩压SD和cv高于收缩压负差≤-5 mmHg或收缩压正差的个体。结论:我们的研究结果表明,办公室和动态收缩压的负差值可能是一个潜在的危险因素,即使在没有明显HMOD的个体中也是如此。试验注册:该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03855605)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Hypertension
Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信