Electromyographic Activity of Sternocleidomastoid Muscle in Individuals With Neck Pain and Healthy Volunteers: A Reliability and Between-Group Differences Examination

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Fotios Iliopoulos MSc (PT) , Zacharias Dimitriadis PhD , George A. Koumantakis PhD
{"title":"Electromyographic Activity of Sternocleidomastoid Muscle in Individuals With Neck Pain and Healthy Volunteers: A Reliability and Between-Group Differences Examination","authors":"Fotios Iliopoulos MSc (PT) ,&nbsp;Zacharias Dimitriadis PhD ,&nbsp;George A. Koumantakis PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid muscle during the performance of the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) in individuals with neck pain and healthy volunteers, assess the reliability of this method, and examine possible between-population differences.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid muscles of 22 individuals with neck pain and 22 healthy participants was recorded during the 55 stages of the CCFT. Pain (visual analog scale) and disability (Neck Disability Index) levels and pain duration were recorded for the participants with neck pain. Reliability of electromyography<span> was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Within-day reliability indices of electromyographic activity were very good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.86-0.98; standard error of measurement, 1.8%-7.6%; minimum detectable change, 5.0%-21.1%). For the head-lift normalization method, 2-way analysis of variance revealed significant between-group differences (<em>P</em> &lt; .02); however, these were not clinically significant when reliability test-retest error was considered. Differences between contraction levels were significant (<em>P</em> &lt; .001); however, the group by contraction level interaction factor was nonsignificant. Therefore, the between-groups electromyographic increases noted with increasing contraction levels were similar. No correlation was identified between participants’ electromyography data and pain or disability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In participants with moderate pain, disability, and pain duration, no clear alterations in electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid could be detected with the CCFT. Reliability of the test used was very good.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422001282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid muscle during the performance of the craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) in individuals with neck pain and healthy volunteers, assess the reliability of this method, and examine possible between-population differences.

Methods

Electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid muscles of 22 individuals with neck pain and 22 healthy participants was recorded during the 55 stages of the CCFT. Pain (visual analog scale) and disability (Neck Disability Index) levels and pain duration were recorded for the participants with neck pain. Reliability of electromyography was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change.

Results

Within-day reliability indices of electromyographic activity were very good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.86-0.98; standard error of measurement, 1.8%-7.6%; minimum detectable change, 5.0%-21.1%). For the head-lift normalization method, 2-way analysis of variance revealed significant between-group differences (P < .02); however, these were not clinically significant when reliability test-retest error was considered. Differences between contraction levels were significant (P < .001); however, the group by contraction level interaction factor was nonsignificant. Therefore, the between-groups electromyographic increases noted with increasing contraction levels were similar. No correlation was identified between participants’ electromyography data and pain or disability.

Conclusion

In participants with moderate pain, disability, and pain duration, no clear alterations in electromyographic activity of the sternocleidomastoid could be detected with the CCFT. Reliability of the test used was very good.

颈痛患者和健康志愿者胸锁乳突肌肌电图活动:可靠性和组间差异检验
目的本研究的目的是评估颈痛个体和健康志愿者在进行颅颈屈曲试验(CCFT)时胸锁乳突肌的肌电图活动,评估该方法的可靠性,并检查可能的人群差异。方法记录22例颈痛患者和22例正常人在55个阶段的胸锁乳突肌肌电图活动。记录颈部疼痛参与者的疼痛(视觉模拟量表)和残疾(颈部残疾指数)水平和疼痛持续时间。用类内相关系数、测量标准误差和最小可检测变化来评估肌电图的可靠性。结果肌电活动的日内信度指标为极好至极优(类内相关系数为0.86 ~ 0.98;测量标准误差为1.8% ~ 7.6%;最小可检测变化,5.0%-21.1%)。对于头举归一化方法,2-way方差分析显示组间差异显著(P <02);然而,当考虑信度重测误差时,这些结果在临床上并不显著。收缩程度之间的差异是显著的(P <措施);然而,组间受收缩水平的相互作用因子不显著。因此,组间肌电图的增加与收缩程度的增加是相似的。没有发现参与者的肌电图数据与疼痛或残疾之间的相关性。结论在中度疼痛、残疾和疼痛持续时间的参与者中,CCFT未检测到胸锁乳突肌肌电图活动的明显改变。所使用的测试的信度非常好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信