Association between tumor mutations and meningioma recurrence in Grade I/II disease.

Jonathan T Dullea, Vikram Vasan, John W Rutland, Corey M Gill, Danielle Chaluts, Daniel Ranti, Ethan Ellis, Varun Subramanium, Annie Arrighi-Allisan, Yayoi Kinoshita, Russell B McBride, Joshua Bederson, Michael Donovan, Robert Sebra, Melissa Umphlett, Raj K Shrivastava
{"title":"Association between tumor mutations and meningioma recurrence in Grade I/II disease.","authors":"Jonathan T Dullea,&nbsp;Vikram Vasan,&nbsp;John W Rutland,&nbsp;Corey M Gill,&nbsp;Danielle Chaluts,&nbsp;Daniel Ranti,&nbsp;Ethan Ellis,&nbsp;Varun Subramanium,&nbsp;Annie Arrighi-Allisan,&nbsp;Yayoi Kinoshita,&nbsp;Russell B McBride,&nbsp;Joshua Bederson,&nbsp;Michael Donovan,&nbsp;Robert Sebra,&nbsp;Melissa Umphlett,&nbsp;Raj K Shrivastava","doi":"10.18632/oncoscience.570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors with variable prognoses not entirely captured by commonly used classification schemes. We sought to determine the relationship between meningioma mutations and oncologic outcomes using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified 184 grade I and II meningiomas with both >90 days of post-surgical follow-up and linked targeted next-generation sequencing. For mutated genes in greater than 5% of the sample, we computed progression-free survival Cox-regression models stratified by gene. We then built a multi-gene model by including all gene predictors with a <i>p</i>-value of less than 0.20. Starting with that model, we performed backward selection to identify the most predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>ATM</i> (HR = 4.448; 95% CI: 1.517-13.046), <i>CREBBP</i> (HR = 2.727; 95% CI = 1.163-6.396), and <i>POLE</i> (HR = 0.544; HR = 0.311-0.952) were significantly associated with alterations in disease progression after adjusting for clinical and pathologic factors. In the multi-gene model, only POLE remained a significant predictor of recurrence after adjusting for the same clinical covariates. Backwards selection identified recurrence status, resection extent, and mutations in <i>ATM</i> (HR = 7.333; 95% CI = 2.318-23.195) and <i>POLE</i> (HR = 0.413; 95% CI = 0.229-0.743) as predictive of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mutations in ATM and CREBBP were associated with accelerated meningioma recurrence, and mutations in POLE were protective of recurrence. Each mutation has potential implications for treatment. The effect of these mutations on oncologic outcomes and as potential targets for intervention warrants future study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19508,"journal":{"name":"Oncoscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9733702/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors with variable prognoses not entirely captured by commonly used classification schemes. We sought to determine the relationship between meningioma mutations and oncologic outcomes using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel.

Materials and methods: We identified 184 grade I and II meningiomas with both >90 days of post-surgical follow-up and linked targeted next-generation sequencing. For mutated genes in greater than 5% of the sample, we computed progression-free survival Cox-regression models stratified by gene. We then built a multi-gene model by including all gene predictors with a p-value of less than 0.20. Starting with that model, we performed backward selection to identify the most predictive factors.

Results: ATM (HR = 4.448; 95% CI: 1.517-13.046), CREBBP (HR = 2.727; 95% CI = 1.163-6.396), and POLE (HR = 0.544; HR = 0.311-0.952) were significantly associated with alterations in disease progression after adjusting for clinical and pathologic factors. In the multi-gene model, only POLE remained a significant predictor of recurrence after adjusting for the same clinical covariates. Backwards selection identified recurrence status, resection extent, and mutations in ATM (HR = 7.333; 95% CI = 2.318-23.195) and POLE (HR = 0.413; 95% CI = 0.229-0.743) as predictive of recurrence.

Conclusions: Mutations in ATM and CREBBP were associated with accelerated meningioma recurrence, and mutations in POLE were protective of recurrence. Each mutation has potential implications for treatment. The effect of these mutations on oncologic outcomes and as potential targets for intervention warrants future study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肿瘤突变与I/II级脑膜瘤复发的关系
背景:脑膜瘤是一种常见的颅内肿瘤,预后多变,常用的分类方案不能完全反映脑膜瘤的预后。我们试图确定脑膜瘤突变和肿瘤预后之间的关系,使用有针对性的下一代测序小组。材料和方法:我们确定了184例I级和II级脑膜瘤,术后随访均>90天,并进行了相关的靶向下一代测序。对于大于5%的突变基因,我们计算了按基因分层的无进展生存cox -回归模型。然后,我们通过包含p值小于0.20的所有基因预测因子,构建了一个多基因模型。从这个模型开始,我们进行了反向选择,以确定最具预测性的因素。结果:ATM (HR = 4.448;95% ci: 1.517-13.046), crebbp (hr = 2.727;95% CI = 1.163-6.396), POLE (HR = 0.544;HR = 0.311-0.952)在调整临床和病理因素后与疾病进展的改变显著相关。在多基因模型中,在调整了相同的临床协变量后,只有POLE仍然是复发的显著预测因子。反向选择确定了ATM的复发状态、切除程度和突变(HR = 7.333;95% CI = 2.318-23.195)和POLE (HR = 0.413;95% CI = 0.229-0.743)作为预测复发的指标。结论:ATM和CREBBP突变与脑膜瘤加速复发有关,POLE突变对脑膜瘤复发具有保护作用。每个突变都有潜在的治疗意义。这些突变对肿瘤预后的影响以及作为干预的潜在目标值得未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信