One Hundred Courses of Cluster Maintenance Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (CM TMS)-A Clinical Audit Study.

Q3 Medicine
Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2022-10-27
Saxby Pridmore, Jeremy O'Reilly, Ahmed Naguy, Renee Morey, Yvonne Turnier-Shea, Marzena Rybak
{"title":"One Hundred Courses of Cluster Maintenance Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (CM TMS)-A Clinical Audit Study.","authors":"Saxby Pridmore,&nbsp;Jeremy O'Reilly,&nbsp;Ahmed Naguy,&nbsp;Renee Morey,&nbsp;Yvonne Turnier-Shea,&nbsp;Marzena Rybak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) which comes to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is prone to relapse. Cluster maintenance (CM) TMS is courses of 5 treatments delivered over 2.5-5 days, separated by monthly or greater non-treatment periods. Our aim was to characterize the outcomes of 100 courses of CM TMS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a Quality Assurance/Clinical Audit study. We studied consecutive CM TMS courses provided to private hospital inpatients. Mood was rated (on admission and discharge) using the six-item Hamilton depression rating (HAMD6) and the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scales. We also applied recent STAR*D criteria which are designed to measure the 'clinical change' expected to impact patient function [16].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the total sample, using the HAMD6, 83% of courses featured relapse or partial relapse on admission, and 81% featured remission on discharge. Of 46 courses featuring HAMD6 relapse on admission, 74% featured remission on discharge. For the 100 courses the HAMD6 discharge scores were significantly lower than the admission scores (p = 2.0 × 10<sup>-24</sup>), as were the CGI-S scores (p = 1.8 × 10<sup>-25</sup>). Using STAR*D criteria for people in relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS provided least a 'clinically meaningful' outcome in 82% of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For courses featuring relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS converted greater than 70% to remission at discharge. It produced statistically significant reductions in HAMD6 and CGI-S scores, and using STAR*D criteria, at least 'clinically meaningful' change was extensively demonstrated. This evidence indicates CM TMS should be readily available to people living with relapsing MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"52 4","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) which comes to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is prone to relapse. Cluster maintenance (CM) TMS is courses of 5 treatments delivered over 2.5-5 days, separated by monthly or greater non-treatment periods. Our aim was to characterize the outcomes of 100 courses of CM TMS.

Method: This was a Quality Assurance/Clinical Audit study. We studied consecutive CM TMS courses provided to private hospital inpatients. Mood was rated (on admission and discharge) using the six-item Hamilton depression rating (HAMD6) and the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scales. We also applied recent STAR*D criteria which are designed to measure the 'clinical change' expected to impact patient function [16].

Results: For the total sample, using the HAMD6, 83% of courses featured relapse or partial relapse on admission, and 81% featured remission on discharge. Of 46 courses featuring HAMD6 relapse on admission, 74% featured remission on discharge. For the 100 courses the HAMD6 discharge scores were significantly lower than the admission scores (p = 2.0 × 10-24), as were the CGI-S scores (p = 1.8 × 10-25). Using STAR*D criteria for people in relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS provided least a 'clinically meaningful' outcome in 82% of the cases.

Conclusion: For courses featuring relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS converted greater than 70% to remission at discharge. It produced statistically significant reductions in HAMD6 and CGI-S scores, and using STAR*D criteria, at least 'clinically meaningful' change was extensively demonstrated. This evidence indicates CM TMS should be readily available to people living with relapsing MDD.

集群维持经颅磁刺激(CM-TMS)的一百个课程——一项临床审计研究。
目的:经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发的重度抑郁障碍(MDD)易复发。集群维持(CM)TMS是在2.5-5天内进行的5次治疗的疗程,分为每月或更长的非治疗期。我们的目的是描述100个CM TMS疗程的结果。方法:这是一项质量保证/临床审计研究。我们研究了为私立医院住院患者提供的连续CM TMS课程。使用汉密尔顿抑郁六项评分(HAMD6)和临床整体印象-严重程度(CGI-S)量表对情绪进行评分(入院和出院时)。我们还应用了最近的STAR*D标准,该标准旨在衡量预计会影响患者功能的“临床变化”[16]。结果:对于总样本,使用HAMD6,83%的疗程在入院时出现复发或部分复发,81%的疗程在出院时出现缓解。在入院时HAMD6复发的46个疗程中,74%的疗程在出院时病情缓解。在100个疗程中,HAMD6出院分数显著低于入院分数(p=2.0×10-24),CGI-S分数(p=1.8×10-25)也是如此。对于入院时复发或部分复发的患者,使用STAR*D标准,CM TMS在82%的病例中提供的“临床意义”最小的结果。结论:对于入院时复发或部分复发的疗程,CM-TMS在出院时转化率超过70%。它使HAMD6和CGI-S评分在统计学上显著降低,并且使用STAR*D标准,至少广泛证明了“有临床意义”的变化。这一证据表明,CM TMS应该很容易用于复发性MDD患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信