The diabetes education material on diabetes for website: Results of a validation process

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
L. Velázquez López , R. Achar de la Macorra , E. Colin Ramirez , A.V. Muñoz Torres , I. Pineda del Aguila , P.G. Medina Bravo , M. Klünder Klünder , O.S. Medina Gómez , J. Escobedo de la Peña
{"title":"The diabetes education material on diabetes for website: Results of a validation process","authors":"L. Velázquez López ,&nbsp;R. Achar de la Macorra ,&nbsp;E. Colin Ramirez ,&nbsp;A.V. Muñoz Torres ,&nbsp;I. Pineda del Aguila ,&nbsp;P.G. Medina Bravo ,&nbsp;M. Klünder Klünder ,&nbsp;O.S. Medina Gómez ,&nbsp;J. Escobedo de la Peña","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate an educational material on diabetes through an expert consensus for its implementation into a web site.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An observational study was carried out in a group of health professionals, for which an educational material was developed for patients with diabetes. Topics included nutrition, physical exercise, control indicators, complications, pharmacological treatment, among others. The language, text and figures were focused on easy comprehension, additionally, a section of didactic activities to be answered by the patient with diabetes at the end of each module was included. To evaluate the educational material by health professionals, an instrument was designed and validated. Once all the educational material was available, each of the modules was sent by e-mail to at least three clinical experts in the assigned topic, as well as the instrument for the evaluation of the module.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-seven experts were included in the study, 76% rated the educational modules evaluated as highly adequate, while only 24% rated them as adequate. The instrument used obtained a good level of internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.92. In the dimensions of the instrument, the lowest Cronbach's alpha score was that of “call-to-action”, with a value of 0.71.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The diabetes educational material was rated as highly appropriate by the clinical experts. The developed instrument has an adequate content validity, as well as a good level of internal consistency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To validate an educational material on diabetes through an expert consensus for its implementation into a web site.

Material and methods

An observational study was carried out in a group of health professionals, for which an educational material was developed for patients with diabetes. Topics included nutrition, physical exercise, control indicators, complications, pharmacological treatment, among others. The language, text and figures were focused on easy comprehension, additionally, a section of didactic activities to be answered by the patient with diabetes at the end of each module was included. To evaluate the educational material by health professionals, an instrument was designed and validated. Once all the educational material was available, each of the modules was sent by e-mail to at least three clinical experts in the assigned topic, as well as the instrument for the evaluation of the module.

Results

Thirty-seven experts were included in the study, 76% rated the educational modules evaluated as highly adequate, while only 24% rated them as adequate. The instrument used obtained a good level of internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.92. In the dimensions of the instrument, the lowest Cronbach's alpha score was that of “call-to-action”, with a value of 0.71.

Conclusion

The diabetes educational material was rated as highly appropriate by the clinical experts. The developed instrument has an adequate content validity, as well as a good level of internal consistency.

糖尿病教育资料的糖尿病网站:验证过程的结果
目的通过专家共识,验证糖尿病教育教材在网站上的应用。材料和方法在一组卫生专业人员中进行了一项观察性研究,并为此编写了针对糖尿病患者的教育材料。主题包括营养、体育锻炼、控制指标、并发症、药物治疗等。语言、文本和图表都以易于理解为重点,此外,在每个模块的末尾还包括一节由糖尿病患者回答的教学活动。为了评估卫生专业人员的教育材料,设计并验证了一种工具。一旦所有的教育材料都准备好了,每个模块都通过电子邮件发送给至少三位指定主题的临床专家,以及评估模块的工具。结果37位专家参与了研究,76%的专家认为教育模块是高度适当的,只有24%的专家认为是适当的。所使用的仪器获得了良好的内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha系数为0.92。在该工具的维度中,Cronbach's alpha得分最低的是“call-to-action”,其值为0.71。结论临床专家对该教材评价较高。所研制的仪器具有足够的内容效度和良好的内部一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信