Genetic and environmental influences on quality of life: The COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Margot P. van de Weijer, Dirk H. M. Pelt, Lianne P. de Vries, Floris Huider, Matthijs D. van der Zee, Quinta Helmer, Lannie Ligthart, Gonneke Willemsen, Dorret I. Boomsma, Eco de Geus, Meike Bartels
{"title":"Genetic and environmental influences on quality of life: The COVID-19 pandemic as a natural experiment","authors":"Margot P. van de Weijer,&nbsp;Dirk H. M. Pelt,&nbsp;Lianne P. de Vries,&nbsp;Floris Huider,&nbsp;Matthijs D. van der Zee,&nbsp;Quinta Helmer,&nbsp;Lannie Ligthart,&nbsp;Gonneke Willemsen,&nbsp;Dorret I. Boomsma,&nbsp;Eco de Geus,&nbsp;Meike Bartels","doi":"10.1111/gbb.12796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>By treating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as a natural experiment, we examine the influence of substantial environmental change (i.e., lockdown measures) on individual differences in quality of life (QoL) in the Netherlands. We compare QoL scores before the pandemic (<i>N</i> = 25,772) to QoL scores during the pandemic (<i>N</i> = 17,222) in a sample of twins and their family members. On a 10-point scale, we find a significant decrease in mean QoL from 7.73 (SD = 1.06) before the pandemic to 7.02 (SD = 1.36) during the pandemic (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.49). Additionally, variance decomposition shows an increase in unique environmental variance during the pandemic (0.30–1.08), and a decrease in the heritability estimate from 30.9% to 15.5%. We hypothesize that the increased environmental variance is the result of lockdown measures not impacting everybody equally. Whether these effects persist over longer periods and how they impact health inequalities remain topics for future investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9111595/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gbb.12796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

By treating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as a natural experiment, we examine the influence of substantial environmental change (i.e., lockdown measures) on individual differences in quality of life (QoL) in the Netherlands. We compare QoL scores before the pandemic (N = 25,772) to QoL scores during the pandemic (N = 17,222) in a sample of twins and their family members. On a 10-point scale, we find a significant decrease in mean QoL from 7.73 (SD = 1.06) before the pandemic to 7.02 (SD = 1.36) during the pandemic (Cohen's d = 0.49). Additionally, variance decomposition shows an increase in unique environmental variance during the pandemic (0.30–1.08), and a decrease in the heritability estimate from 30.9% to 15.5%. We hypothesize that the increased environmental variance is the result of lockdown measures not impacting everybody equally. Whether these effects persist over longer periods and how they impact health inequalities remain topics for future investigation.

Abstract Image

遗传和环境对生活质量的影响:COVID-19大流行是一种自然实验
通过将2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行视为自然实验,我们研究了荷兰重大环境变化(即封锁措施)对生活质量个体差异的影响。我们比较了双胞胎及其家庭成员在大流行前(N = 25,772)和大流行期间(N = 17,222)的生活质量评分。在10分制量表上,我们发现平均生活质量从大流行前的7.73 (SD = 1.06)显著下降到大流行期间的7.02 (SD = 1.36) (Cohen’SD = 0.49)。此外,方差分解显示,大流行期间独特环境方差增加(0.30-1.08),遗传力估计值从30.9%下降到15.5%。我们假设,环境差异的增加是封锁措施对每个人的影响不平等的结果。这些影响是否会持续更长时间,以及它们如何影响健康不平等,仍是未来调查的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信