Human-centred health-care environments: a new framework for biophilic design.

Bekir Huseyin Tekin, Rosa Urbano Gutiérrez
{"title":"Human-centred health-care environments: a new framework for biophilic design.","authors":"Bekir Huseyin Tekin,&nbsp;Rosa Urbano Gutiérrez","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2023.1219897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing research corroborates that the qualities of the setting in which a patient receives healthcare positively influence health outcomes. Therefore, it has become progressively important to review the concept of therapeutic environments, as places where patients are treated with the most advanced medicine and technology, but also support their users in psychological, emotional and social terms. This quest for the optimal healing environment brings to the forefront the need to include other parameters in our design briefs, where the application of biophilic design proves to be paramount, as exposure to nature is associated with multiple health benefits. However, current biophilic design frameworks fail to provide efficient guidance, as their design recommendations don't differentiate the level of value of each design parameter for each building programme and context. Our position is that a biophilic design framework can only be efficient if it is adapted to specific building functions and is geographically and culturally contextualized. This study assessed the application of biophilic design in therapeutic environments for cancer patients in the UK, and provided a revised conceptual framework that can more efficiently guide designers and policies in future interventions. This framework was informed by synthesised analyses from healthcare environments on the user's experiences, and primary data obtained from semi-structured interviews with architects and managers, which was then benchmarked against scientific data about the impact of biophilic design on humans. This comprehensive approach helped to identify and rank those biophilic design parameters that appear the most critical for promoting and supporting health and wellbeing in cancer healthcare settings and provided an up-to-date compilation of crucial design actions to enact the necessary change in future research and design practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12599,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"1219897"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1219897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasing research corroborates that the qualities of the setting in which a patient receives healthcare positively influence health outcomes. Therefore, it has become progressively important to review the concept of therapeutic environments, as places where patients are treated with the most advanced medicine and technology, but also support their users in psychological, emotional and social terms. This quest for the optimal healing environment brings to the forefront the need to include other parameters in our design briefs, where the application of biophilic design proves to be paramount, as exposure to nature is associated with multiple health benefits. However, current biophilic design frameworks fail to provide efficient guidance, as their design recommendations don't differentiate the level of value of each design parameter for each building programme and context. Our position is that a biophilic design framework can only be efficient if it is adapted to specific building functions and is geographically and culturally contextualized. This study assessed the application of biophilic design in therapeutic environments for cancer patients in the UK, and provided a revised conceptual framework that can more efficiently guide designers and policies in future interventions. This framework was informed by synthesised analyses from healthcare environments on the user's experiences, and primary data obtained from semi-structured interviews with architects and managers, which was then benchmarked against scientific data about the impact of biophilic design on humans. This comprehensive approach helped to identify and rank those biophilic design parameters that appear the most critical for promoting and supporting health and wellbeing in cancer healthcare settings and provided an up-to-date compilation of crucial design actions to enact the necessary change in future research and design practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以人为本的保健环境:亲生物设计的新框架。
越来越多的研究证实,患者接受医疗保健的环境质量对健康结果有积极影响。因此,审查治疗环境的概念变得越来越重要,因为治疗环境是用最先进的药物和技术治疗患者的地方,同时也在心理、情感和社会方面为其使用者提供支持。对最佳治疗环境的追求使我们的设计大纲中需要包括其他参数,其中亲生物设计的应用被证明是至关重要的,因为接触自然与多种健康益处有关。然而,目前的亲生物设计框架无法提供有效的指导,因为它们的设计建议没有区分每个建筑方案和环境的每个设计参数的价值水平。我们的立场是,一个亲生物的设计框架只有在适应特定的建筑功能和地理和文化背景的情况下才能有效。本研究评估了亲生物设计在英国癌症患者治疗环境中的应用,并提供了一个修订的概念框架,可以更有效地指导未来干预的设计者和政策。该框架是通过对医疗保健环境对用户体验的综合分析,以及从建筑师和管理人员的半结构化访谈中获得的主要数据来提供信息的,然后根据有关亲生物设计对人类影响的科学数据进行基准测试。这种全面的方法有助于识别和排序那些亲生物的设计参数,这些参数对于促进和支持癌症医疗保健环境中的健康和福祉至关重要,并提供了关键设计行动的最新汇编,以便在未来的研究和设计实践中进行必要的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信