Preserving Nipple Sensitivity after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Varsha Harish, Zoe K Haffner, Jenna C Bekeny, Adaah A Sayyed, David H Song, Kenneth L Fan
{"title":"Preserving Nipple Sensitivity after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Varsha Harish,&nbsp;Zoe K Haffner,&nbsp;Jenna C Bekeny,&nbsp;Adaah A Sayyed,&nbsp;David H Song,&nbsp;Kenneth L Fan","doi":"10.1155/2022/9654741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As breast-conserving procedures become increasingly safe and viable options for surgical management of breast cancer, efforts have focused on assessing and optimizing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as nipple sensation. This study aims to evaluate the current understanding of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sensation outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries, namely, nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM), skin-sparing mastectomies (SSM), and lumpectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles including terms related to \"nipple,\" \"mastectomy,\" \"sensation,\" and \"patient-reported outcome\" were queried from three databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Study characteristics, patient demographics, and surgical details were recorded. Outcomes of interest included objective nipple sensitivity testing and PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 888 manuscripts identified, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twelve studies (<i>n</i> = 578 patients) used objective measures to evaluate sensitivity, such as monofilament testing. Sixteen studies (<i>n</i> = 1785 patients) assessed PROMs through validated or investigator-generated surveys. Three of the included studies reported NAC sensitivity in patients who received NSM with neurotization (<i>n</i> = 203 patients) through a variety of techniques that used various grafts to coapt a lateral intercostal nerve to the NAC nerve stumps. Results of investigator surveys showed that of 1565 patients without neurotization, nipple sensation was maintained in 29.0% (<i>n</i> = 453) of patients. Of 138 NSM patients without NAC neurotization, SWM testing showed an average loss of protective sensation in the nipple (average SWM score: 4.7) compared to normal or diminished sensation to light touch in nonoperated controls (average SWM score: 2.9, <i>n</i> = 195). Of patients who underwent NSM with neurotization, one study (<i>n</i> = 78) reported maintenance of NAC sensation in 100% of patients, while another study (<i>n</i> = 7) reported average diminished protective sensation in the nipple (average SWM score: 3.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study has shown that objective and patient-reported results of nipple sensitivity support nipple-sparing techniques as a viable option for preserving NAC sensation, although patients can expect a decrease in sensation overall. Neurotization of the NAC during NSM shows promising results of improved postoperative nipple sensitivity, though additional studies are warranted to confirm this finding. Variations between study methodologies highlight the lack of standardization in sensory testing techniques when evaluating NAC sensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2022 ","pages":"9654741"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9654741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: As breast-conserving procedures become increasingly safe and viable options for surgical management of breast cancer, efforts have focused on assessing and optimizing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as nipple sensation. This study aims to evaluate the current understanding of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sensation outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing breast cancer surgeries, namely, nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM), skin-sparing mastectomies (SSM), and lumpectomies.

Methods: Articles including terms related to "nipple," "mastectomy," "sensation," and "patient-reported outcome" were queried from three databases according to PRISMA guidelines. Study characteristics, patient demographics, and surgical details were recorded. Outcomes of interest included objective nipple sensitivity testing and PROMs.

Results: Of 888 manuscripts identified, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twelve studies (n = 578 patients) used objective measures to evaluate sensitivity, such as monofilament testing. Sixteen studies (n = 1785 patients) assessed PROMs through validated or investigator-generated surveys. Three of the included studies reported NAC sensitivity in patients who received NSM with neurotization (n = 203 patients) through a variety of techniques that used various grafts to coapt a lateral intercostal nerve to the NAC nerve stumps. Results of investigator surveys showed that of 1565 patients without neurotization, nipple sensation was maintained in 29.0% (n = 453) of patients. Of 138 NSM patients without NAC neurotization, SWM testing showed an average loss of protective sensation in the nipple (average SWM score: 4.7) compared to normal or diminished sensation to light touch in nonoperated controls (average SWM score: 2.9, n = 195). Of patients who underwent NSM with neurotization, one study (n = 78) reported maintenance of NAC sensation in 100% of patients, while another study (n = 7) reported average diminished protective sensation in the nipple (average SWM score: 3.9).

Conclusion: Our study has shown that objective and patient-reported results of nipple sensitivity support nipple-sparing techniques as a viable option for preserving NAC sensation, although patients can expect a decrease in sensation overall. Neurotization of the NAC during NSM shows promising results of improved postoperative nipple sensitivity, though additional studies are warranted to confirm this finding. Variations between study methodologies highlight the lack of standardization in sensory testing techniques when evaluating NAC sensation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

乳腺癌手术后保留乳头敏感性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:随着保乳手术在乳腺癌手术治疗中变得越来越安全和可行,人们一直致力于评估和优化患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),如乳头感觉。本研究旨在评估目前对乳腺癌手术(即保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM)、保留皮肤乳房切除术(SSM)和乳房肿瘤切除术)患者乳头-乳晕复合体(NAC)感觉结果的认识。方法:根据PRISMA指南从三个数据库中查询包括“乳头”、“乳房切除术”、“感觉”和“患者报告的结果”相关术语的文章。记录研究特征、患者人口统计和手术细节。结果包括客观乳头敏感性测试和PROMs。结果:888篇文献中,28篇符合纳入标准。12项研究(n = 578例患者)采用客观方法评估敏感性,如单丝试验。16项研究(n = 1785例患者)通过验证或研究者生成的调查来评估PROMs。纳入的研究中有三项报告了接受NSM伴神经化的患者(n = 203例患者)的NAC敏感性,这些患者通过各种技术使用各种移植物将外侧肋间神经覆盖到NAC神经残端。研究者调查结果显示,在1565例未神经化的患者中,29.0% (n = 453)的患者保持乳头感觉。在138名没有NAC神经化的NSM患者中,SWM测试显示,与未手术对照组(平均SWM评分:2.9,n = 195)相比,乳头保护性感觉的平均丧失(平均SWM评分:4.7)。在接受神经化治疗的NSM患者中,一项研究(n = 78)报告100%的患者NAC感觉维持,而另一项研究(n = 7)报告乳头保护性感觉平均减少(平均SWM评分:3.9)。结论:我们的研究表明,客观和患者报告的乳头敏感性结果支持保留乳头技术作为保留NAC感觉的可行选择,尽管患者可能会预期感觉整体下降。NSM期间NAC神经化显示了改善术后乳头敏感性的良好结果,尽管需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现。研究方法之间的差异突出了在评估NAC感觉时感官测试技术缺乏标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信