Novel findings on anti-plaque effects of stannous fluoride.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2022-12-01
Tao He, Yuanshu Zou, Joe DiGennaro, Aaron R Biesbrock
{"title":"Novel findings on anti-plaque effects of stannous fluoride.","authors":"Tao He,&nbsp;Yuanshu Zou,&nbsp;Joe DiGennaro,&nbsp;Aaron R Biesbrock","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the antiplaque effects for 0.454% bioavailable gluconate chelated stannous fluoride (SnF₂) dentifrices versus controls by clinical model, plaque index, tooth surface and tooth type in a pooled analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate plaque effects of SnF₂ dentifrices from the same formulation family over the past 30 years. Forty-four 4-day and longer-term (≥ 2 weeks) RCTs conducted in six countries with 3,336 subjects using Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index, Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index, Digital Plaque Imaging Analysis, and Silness and Löe Plaque Index were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 13 and 11 longer-term studies assessing SnF₂ dentifrice versus a negative or positive control, respectively, standardized differences in average plaque score of -1.15 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.69) and -0.74 (95% CI: -1.20, -0.28) were observed (P ≤ 0.011), favoring SnF₂. Reductions represented a 19% and 16% benefit versus the negative and positive control, respectively. In 18 and five 4-day studies assessing SnF₂ dentifrice versus a negative (NaF/SMFP) or positive (triclosan/chlorhexidine) control, respectively, differences in average 4-day plaque score of -0.27 (95% CI: -0.31, -0.23) and -0.15 (95% CI: -0.25, -0.06) were observed (P≤ 0.001) favoring SnF₂. Reductions represented a 14% and 11% benefit versus the negative and positive control, respectively. Significant antiplaque benefits for SnF₂ dentifrice were seen regardless of clinical model, plaque index, tooth surface or type, including brushed and unbrushed surfaces (P≤ 0.049).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Bioavailable gluconate chelated SnF₂ dentifrices showed consistent plaque inhibition versus negative and positive controls across all conditions evaluated. Importantly, the effect on unbrushed surfaces illustrated the significant plaque inhibition benefit of SnF₂ beyond mechanical plaque removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the antiplaque effects for 0.454% bioavailable gluconate chelated stannous fluoride (SnF₂) dentifrices versus controls by clinical model, plaque index, tooth surface and tooth type in a pooled analysis.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to evaluate plaque effects of SnF₂ dentifrices from the same formulation family over the past 30 years. Forty-four 4-day and longer-term (≥ 2 weeks) RCTs conducted in six countries with 3,336 subjects using Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index, Rustogi Modification of the Navy Plaque Index, Digital Plaque Imaging Analysis, and Silness and Löe Plaque Index were included.

Results: In 13 and 11 longer-term studies assessing SnF₂ dentifrice versus a negative or positive control, respectively, standardized differences in average plaque score of -1.15 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.69) and -0.74 (95% CI: -1.20, -0.28) were observed (P ≤ 0.011), favoring SnF₂. Reductions represented a 19% and 16% benefit versus the negative and positive control, respectively. In 18 and five 4-day studies assessing SnF₂ dentifrice versus a negative (NaF/SMFP) or positive (triclosan/chlorhexidine) control, respectively, differences in average 4-day plaque score of -0.27 (95% CI: -0.31, -0.23) and -0.15 (95% CI: -0.25, -0.06) were observed (P≤ 0.001) favoring SnF₂. Reductions represented a 14% and 11% benefit versus the negative and positive control, respectively. Significant antiplaque benefits for SnF₂ dentifrice were seen regardless of clinical model, plaque index, tooth surface or type, including brushed and unbrushed surfaces (P≤ 0.049).

Clinical significance: Bioavailable gluconate chelated SnF₂ dentifrices showed consistent plaque inhibition versus negative and positive controls across all conditions evaluated. Importantly, the effect on unbrushed surfaces illustrated the significant plaque inhibition benefit of SnF₂ beyond mechanical plaque removal.

氟化亚锡抗牙菌斑作用的新发现。
目的:通过临床模型、牙菌斑指数、牙表面和牙型的综合分析,评价0.454%生物可利用葡萄糖酸盐螯合氟化亚锡(SnF₂)牙膏与对照组的抗牙菌斑效果。方法:采用随机对照试验(rct)来评估30年来同一配方家族的SnF 2牙膏对斑块的影响。采用Turesky改良Quigley-Hein斑块指数、Rustogi改良海军斑块指数、数字斑块成像分析以及Silness和Löe斑块指数,在6个国家进行了44项为期4天或更长(≥2周)的随机对照试验,涉及3336名受试者。结果:在分别评估SnF 2与阴性或阳性对照的13和11项长期研究中,观察到平均斑块评分的标准化差异为-1.15 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.69)和-0.74 (95% CI: -1.20, -0.28) (P≤0.011),有利于SnF 2。与阴性对照和阳性对照相比,减量分别代表19%和16%的效益。在18项和5项评估SnF₂与阴性(NaF/SMFP)或阳性(三氯沙/氯己定)对照的4天研究中,观察到平均4天斑块评分的差异为-0.27 (95% CI: -0.31, -0.23)和-0.15 (95% CI: -0.25, -0.06) (P≤0.001),有利于SnF₂。与阴性对照和阳性对照相比,减少的比例分别为14%和11%。无论临床模型、菌斑指数、牙齿表面或类型(包括刷牙和未刷牙表面)如何,SnF 2牙膏的抗菌斑效果均显著(P≤0.049)。临床意义:生物可利用的葡萄糖酸盐螯合的SnF 2牙膏在所有评估条件下与阴性和阳性对照相比显示出一致的斑块抑制作用。重要的是,对未刷表面的影响表明SnF₂比机械去除斑块具有显著的斑块抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信