Novelty in Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics.

Gayo Diallo, Georgeta Bordea
{"title":"Novelty in Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics.","authors":"Gayo Diallo,&nbsp;Georgeta Bordea","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To highlight novelty studies and current trends in Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics (PHEI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Similar to last year's edition, a PubMed search of 2021 scientific publications on PHEI has been conducted. The resulting references were reviewed by the two section editors. Then, 11 candidate best papers were selected from the initial 782 references. These papers were then peer-reviewed by selected external reviewers. They included at least two senior researchers, to allow the Editorial Committee of the 2022 IMIA Yearbook edition to make an informed decision for selecting the best papers of the PHEI section.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 782 references retrieved from PubMed, two were selected as the best papers. The first best paper reports a study which performed a comprehensive comparison of traditional statistical approaches (e.g., Cox Proportional Hazards models) vs. machine learning techniques in a large, real-world dataset for predicting breast cancer survival, with a focus on explainability. The second paper describes the engineering of deep learning models to establish associations between ocular features and major hepatobiliary diseases and to advance automated screening and identification of hepatobiliary diseases from ocular images.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, from this year edition, we observed that the number of studies related to PHEI has decreased. The findings of the two studies selected as best papers on the topic suggest that a significant effort is still being made by the community to compare traditional learning methods with deep learning methods. Using multimodality datasets (images, texts) could improve approaches for tackling public health issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"31 1","pages":"273-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/55/e8/10-1055-s-0042-1742526.PMC9719774.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: To highlight novelty studies and current trends in Public Health and Epidemiology Informatics (PHEI).

Methods: Similar to last year's edition, a PubMed search of 2021 scientific publications on PHEI has been conducted. The resulting references were reviewed by the two section editors. Then, 11 candidate best papers were selected from the initial 782 references. These papers were then peer-reviewed by selected external reviewers. They included at least two senior researchers, to allow the Editorial Committee of the 2022 IMIA Yearbook edition to make an informed decision for selecting the best papers of the PHEI section.

Results: Among the 782 references retrieved from PubMed, two were selected as the best papers. The first best paper reports a study which performed a comprehensive comparison of traditional statistical approaches (e.g., Cox Proportional Hazards models) vs. machine learning techniques in a large, real-world dataset for predicting breast cancer survival, with a focus on explainability. The second paper describes the engineering of deep learning models to establish associations between ocular features and major hepatobiliary diseases and to advance automated screening and identification of hepatobiliary diseases from ocular images.

Conclusion: Overall, from this year edition, we observed that the number of studies related to PHEI has decreased. The findings of the two studies selected as best papers on the topic suggest that a significant effort is still being made by the community to compare traditional learning methods with deep learning methods. Using multimodality datasets (images, texts) could improve approaches for tackling public health issues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

公共卫生和流行病学信息学的新颖性。
目的:强调公共卫生和流行病学信息学(PHEI)的新研究和当前趋势。方法:与去年的版本类似,PubMed检索了2021篇关于PHEI的科学出版物。最后的参考文献由两位章节编辑审阅。然后,从最初的782篇参考文献中选出11篇候选最佳论文。这些论文随后由选定的外部审稿人进行同行评审。他们至少包括两名资深研究员,以便让2022年IMIA年鉴编辑委员会在选择PHEI部分的最佳论文时做出明智的决定。结果:在PubMed检索到的782篇文献中,有2篇入选最佳论文。第一篇最佳论文报告了一项研究,该研究在预测乳腺癌生存的大型真实数据集中对传统统计方法(例如Cox比例风险模型)与机器学习技术进行了全面比较,重点是可解释性。第二篇论文描述了深度学习模型的工程,以建立眼部特征与主要肝胆疾病之间的关联,并推进从眼部图像中自动筛选和识别肝胆疾病。结论:总的来说,从今年的版本开始,我们观察到与PHEI相关的研究数量有所减少。被选为该主题最佳论文的两项研究的结果表明,社区仍在努力将传统学习方法与深度学习方法进行比较。使用多模态数据集(图像、文本)可以改进处理公共卫生问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信