Surgical Strategy in Modification of the Transpetrosal Approach to Avoid Postoperative Venous Complications: A Report of 74 Consecutive Cases.

Q2 Medicine
Pree Nimmannitya, Takeo Goto, Atsufumi Nagahama, Yuta Tanoue, Yuzo Terakawa, Toshiyuki Kawashima, Hiroki Morisako, Kenji Ohata
{"title":"Surgical Strategy in Modification of the Transpetrosal Approach to Avoid Postoperative Venous Complications: A Report of 74 Consecutive Cases.","authors":"Pree Nimmannitya,&nbsp;Takeo Goto,&nbsp;Atsufumi Nagahama,&nbsp;Yuta Tanoue,&nbsp;Yuzo Terakawa,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Kawashima,&nbsp;Hiroki Morisako,&nbsp;Kenji Ohata","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-12887-6_4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transpetrosal approach is a complex skull base procedure with a high risk of complications, particularly caused by injury of the venous system. It is in part related to variability of blood outflow pathways and their distinctive patterns in each individual patient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate outcomes and complications after skull base surgery with use of the petrosal approach modifications, which selection was based on the detailed preoperative assessment of venous drainage patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 74 patients, who underwent surgery via the transpetrosal approach at our institution between 2000 and 2017, were included in this study. In all cases, the venous drainage pattern was assessed preoperatively and categorized according to the predominant blood outflow pathway into four types as previously suggested by Hacker: (1) sphenoparietal sinus (SpPrt), (2) sphenobasal vein (SpB), (3) sphenopetrosal sinus (SpPS), and (4) cortical. The blood outflow through the bridging petrosal vein and the vein of Labbé was also taken into consideration. In patients with SpPrt- and a cortical-type venous drainage, the transpetrosal approach was used in a standard way. In patients with SpB-type venous drainage, limited extradural anterior petrosectomy was combined with intradural anterior petrosectomy after dural opening, superior petrosal sinus transection, tentorial cutting, Meckel's cave opening, and trigeminal nerve mobilization. In patients with SpPS-type venous drainage, after standard petrosectomy, dural opening, and tentorial cutting, SpPS ligation was done followed by 2-week interval before staged definitive tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gross total, near-total, and subtotal resection of the lesion (meningioma, 48 cases; retrochiasmatic craniopharyngioma, 11 cases; brain stem cavernoma, 7 cases; other tumors, 8 cases) was achieved in 30 (40.5%), 24 (32.4%), and 20 (27.0%) patients, respectively. Postoperative complications that were possibly related to venous compromise were noted in 18 patients (24.3%), but neither one was major. Of these 18 patients, 9 were symptomatic, but all symptoms-aphasia (4 cases), seizures (2 cases), and confusion (3 cases)-fully resolved after conservative treatment. Overall, 13 patients, including 4 symptomatic, had signal changes on T2-weighted brain MRI, which were permanent only in 3 cases (all asymptomatic).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our suggested surgical strategy can be applied to any type of the venous drainage pattern. Preoperative evaluation and intraoperative preservation of the blood outflow pathways are crucial means for safe and effective application of the transpetrosal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":6913,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement","volume":"130 ","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12887-6_4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The transpetrosal approach is a complex skull base procedure with a high risk of complications, particularly caused by injury of the venous system. It is in part related to variability of blood outflow pathways and their distinctive patterns in each individual patient.

Objective: To evaluate outcomes and complications after skull base surgery with use of the petrosal approach modifications, which selection was based on the detailed preoperative assessment of venous drainage patterns.

Methods: Overall, 74 patients, who underwent surgery via the transpetrosal approach at our institution between 2000 and 2017, were included in this study. In all cases, the venous drainage pattern was assessed preoperatively and categorized according to the predominant blood outflow pathway into four types as previously suggested by Hacker: (1) sphenoparietal sinus (SpPrt), (2) sphenobasal vein (SpB), (3) sphenopetrosal sinus (SpPS), and (4) cortical. The blood outflow through the bridging petrosal vein and the vein of Labbé was also taken into consideration. In patients with SpPrt- and a cortical-type venous drainage, the transpetrosal approach was used in a standard way. In patients with SpB-type venous drainage, limited extradural anterior petrosectomy was combined with intradural anterior petrosectomy after dural opening, superior petrosal sinus transection, tentorial cutting, Meckel's cave opening, and trigeminal nerve mobilization. In patients with SpPS-type venous drainage, after standard petrosectomy, dural opening, and tentorial cutting, SpPS ligation was done followed by 2-week interval before staged definitive tumor resection.

Results: Gross total, near-total, and subtotal resection of the lesion (meningioma, 48 cases; retrochiasmatic craniopharyngioma, 11 cases; brain stem cavernoma, 7 cases; other tumors, 8 cases) was achieved in 30 (40.5%), 24 (32.4%), and 20 (27.0%) patients, respectively. Postoperative complications that were possibly related to venous compromise were noted in 18 patients (24.3%), but neither one was major. Of these 18 patients, 9 were symptomatic, but all symptoms-aphasia (4 cases), seizures (2 cases), and confusion (3 cases)-fully resolved after conservative treatment. Overall, 13 patients, including 4 symptomatic, had signal changes on T2-weighted brain MRI, which were permanent only in 3 cases (all asymptomatic).

Conclusion: Our suggested surgical strategy can be applied to any type of the venous drainage pattern. Preoperative evaluation and intraoperative preservation of the blood outflow pathways are crucial means for safe and effective application of the transpetrosal approach.

改良经岩入路避免术后静脉并发症的手术策略:附74例报告。
背景:经骨窦入路是一种复杂的颅底手术,并发症风险高,特别是由静脉系统损伤引起的。这在一定程度上与每位患者血液流出途径的可变性及其独特的模式有关。目的:评价颅底手术后采用改良岩岩入路的疗效和并发症,选择何种入路是基于术前对静脉引流方式的详细评估。方法:总体而言,本研究纳入了2000年至2017年在我们机构通过经骨入路手术的74例患者。所有病例术前均对静脉引流模式进行评估,并按照Hacker先前提出的主要血液流出途径将其分为四种类型:(1)蝶顶窦(SpPrt)、(2)蝶基底静脉(SpB)、(3)蝶窦(SpPS)和(4)皮质静脉。同时也考虑了桥接岩静脉与labb静脉的血流情况。在SpPrt-和皮质型静脉引流的患者中,采用标准的经骨入路。spb型静脉引流患者,经硬脑膜切开、岩上窦切开、幕部切开、Meckel洞切开、三叉神经活动后,行有限硬脑膜外前路切开联合硬脑膜内前路切开。SpPS型静脉引流患者,经标准岩切开术、硬脑膜切开、脑幕切开后,间隔2周进行SpPS结扎,然后分期最终切除肿瘤。结果:病灶全部、近全、次全切除(脑膜瘤48例;交叉后颅咽管瘤11例;脑干海绵状瘤7例;其他肿瘤8例,分别为30例(40.5%)、24例(32.4%)和20例(27.0%)。18例(24.3%)患者出现可能与静脉衰竭有关的术后并发症,但均不严重。18例患者中有9例出现症状,但经保守治疗后,所有症状(失语4例,癫痫发作2例,意识不清3例)均完全消失。总的来说,13例患者,包括4例有症状的患者,在t2加权脑MRI上有信号改变,只有3例是永久性的(均无症状)。结论:我们建议的手术策略适用于任何类型的静脉引流模式。术前评估和术中保留血流出通道是安全有效地应用经尿道入路的重要手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: In addition to the regular journal, "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes 3-4 supplement volumes per year. These comprise proceedings of international meetings or other material of general neurosurgical interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信