An Intensive Exercise Program Using a Technology-Enriched Rehabilitation Gym for the Recovery of Function in People With Chronic Stroke: Usability Study.

Q2 Medicine
Andy Kerr, Maisie Keogh, Milena Slachetka, Madeleine Grealy, Philip Rowe
{"title":"An Intensive Exercise Program Using a Technology-Enriched Rehabilitation Gym for the Recovery of Function in People With Chronic Stroke: Usability Study.","authors":"Andy Kerr,&nbsp;Maisie Keogh,&nbsp;Milena Slachetka,&nbsp;Madeleine Grealy,&nbsp;Philip Rowe","doi":"10.2196/46619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rehabilitation improves poststroke recovery with greater effect for many when applied intensively within enriched environments. The failure of health care providers to achieve minimum recommendations for rehabilitation motivated the development of a technology-enriched rehabilitation gym (TERG) that enables individuals under supervision to perform high-intensity self-managed exercises safely in an enriched environment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the TERG approach and gather preliminary evidence of its effect for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This feasibility study recruited people well enough to exercise but living with motor impairment following a stroke at least 12 months previously. Following assessment, an 8-week exercise program using a TERG (eg, virtual reality treadmills, power-assisted equipment, balance trainers, and upper limb training systems) was structured in partnership with participants. The feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention, and adherence rates along with participant interviews. Effect sizes were calculated from the mean change in standard outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 70 individuals registered interest, the first 50 were invited for assessment, 39 attended, and 31 were eligible and consented. Following a pilot study (n=5), 26 individuals (mean age 60.4, SD 13.3 years; mean 39.0, SD 29.2 months post stroke; n=17 males; n=10 with aphasia) were recruited to a feasibility study, which 25 individuals completed. Participants attended an average of 18.7 (SD 6.2) sessions with an 82% attendance rate. Reasons for nonattendance related to personal life, illness, weather, care, and transport. In total, 19 adverse events were reported: muscle or joint pain, fatigue, dizziness, and viral illness, all resolved within a week. Participants found the TERG program to be a positive experience with the equipment highly usable albeit with some need for individual tailoring to accommodate body shape and impairment. The inclusion of performance feedback and gamification was well received. Mean improvements in outcome measures were recorded across all domains with low to medium effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study assessed the feasibility of a holistic technology-based solution to the gap between stroke rehabilitation recommendations and provision. The results clearly demonstrate a rehabilitation program delivered through a TERG is feasible in terms of recruitment, retention, adherence, and user acceptability and may lead to considerable improvement in function, even in a chronic stroke population.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.820929.</p>","PeriodicalId":36224,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","volume":"10 ","pages":"e46619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/46619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation improves poststroke recovery with greater effect for many when applied intensively within enriched environments. The failure of health care providers to achieve minimum recommendations for rehabilitation motivated the development of a technology-enriched rehabilitation gym (TERG) that enables individuals under supervision to perform high-intensity self-managed exercises safely in an enriched environment.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the TERG approach and gather preliminary evidence of its effect for future research.

Methods: This feasibility study recruited people well enough to exercise but living with motor impairment following a stroke at least 12 months previously. Following assessment, an 8-week exercise program using a TERG (eg, virtual reality treadmills, power-assisted equipment, balance trainers, and upper limb training systems) was structured in partnership with participants. The feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention, and adherence rates along with participant interviews. Effect sizes were calculated from the mean change in standard outcome measures.

Results: In total, 70 individuals registered interest, the first 50 were invited for assessment, 39 attended, and 31 were eligible and consented. Following a pilot study (n=5), 26 individuals (mean age 60.4, SD 13.3 years; mean 39.0, SD 29.2 months post stroke; n=17 males; n=10 with aphasia) were recruited to a feasibility study, which 25 individuals completed. Participants attended an average of 18.7 (SD 6.2) sessions with an 82% attendance rate. Reasons for nonattendance related to personal life, illness, weather, care, and transport. In total, 19 adverse events were reported: muscle or joint pain, fatigue, dizziness, and viral illness, all resolved within a week. Participants found the TERG program to be a positive experience with the equipment highly usable albeit with some need for individual tailoring to accommodate body shape and impairment. The inclusion of performance feedback and gamification was well received. Mean improvements in outcome measures were recorded across all domains with low to medium effect sizes.

Conclusions: This study assessed the feasibility of a holistic technology-based solution to the gap between stroke rehabilitation recommendations and provision. The results clearly demonstrate a rehabilitation program delivered through a TERG is feasible in terms of recruitment, retention, adherence, and user acceptability and may lead to considerable improvement in function, even in a chronic stroke population.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.820929.

使用技术丰富的康复健身房进行慢性中风患者功能恢复的强化锻炼计划:可用性研究。
背景:对许多人来说,在丰富的环境中进行密集的康复治疗可以提高中风后的恢复效果。卫生保健提供者未能达到康复的最低建议,这促使了技术丰富的康复健身房(TERG)的发展,使个人能够在监督下在丰富的环境中安全地进行高强度的自我管理锻炼。目的:本研究旨在评估TERG方法的可行性,并为后续研究收集其效果的初步证据。方法:这项可行性研究招募了足够锻炼的人,但在中风后至少12个月患有运动障碍。评估后,与参与者合作,使用TERG(例如,虚拟现实跑步机,动力辅助设备,平衡训练器和上肢训练系统)制定了为期8周的锻炼计划。通过招募、保留和依从率以及参与者访谈来评估可行性。效应量由标准结果测量值的平均变化量计算。结果:共有70人登记了兴趣,前50人被邀请进行评估,39人参加,31人符合条件并同意。在一项初步研究(n=5)后,26例患者(平均年龄60.4岁,SD 13.3岁;平均39.0,标准差29.2个月;n = 17岁男性;N =10名失语症患者)被招募进行可行性研究,其中25人完成了研究。参与者平均参加18.7次(SD 6.2)会议,出勤率为82%。因个人生活、疾病、天气、护理、交通等原因缺席的。总共报告了19个不良事件:肌肉或关节疼痛、疲劳、头晕和病毒性疾病,这些不良事件都在一周内解决。参与者发现TERG项目是一种积极的体验,设备高度可用,尽管有些需要个性化定制以适应身体形状和损伤。游戏中加入了表现反馈和游戏化内容。结果测量的平均改善在所有领域均有记录,效果大小为中低。结论:本研究评估了一种基于技术的整体解决方案的可行性,以解决卒中康复建议与提供之间的差距。结果清楚地表明,通过TERG提供的康复计划在招募,保留,依从性和用户可接受性方面是可行的,并且可能导致功能的显著改善,即使在慢性卒中人群中也是如此。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2021.820929。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信