Comparative evaluation of the effect of two natural collagen cross-linkers on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesive system to dentin after contamination with blood and hemostatic agent: An in vitro study.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-28 DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_312_23
Amarjot Kaur D S Manihani, Sanjyot Mulay, Lotika Beri, Anita Tandale, Abhilasha Bhawalkar, Raj Dalsania
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the effect of two natural collagen cross-linkers on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesive system to dentin after contamination with blood and hemostatic agent: An <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Amarjot Kaur D S Manihani, Sanjyot Mulay, Lotika Beri, Anita Tandale, Abhilasha Bhawalkar, Raj Dalsania","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_312_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cavity preparation often causes gingival bleeding which can be controlled by hemostatic agents (HAs). These along with blood act as contaminants and hamper the bonding mechanism. Collagen cross-linkers (CCLs) are agents known to increase the bond strength (BS) to dentin. Hence, the purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of two different CCLs, proanthocyanidin (grape seed extract [GSE]) and hesperidin on the microtensile BS (μTBS) of a self-etch adhesive (SEA) system to dentin which was contaminated with blood and a HA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-six extracted human molars were collected, and their occlusal surfaces were sectioned to expose the dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups: Group I - Control, Group II - Contamination with blood and HA, Group III - Application of GSE after contamination, and Group IV - Application of hesperidin extract after contamination. The SEA was applied, followed by the use of a nanocomposite. Dentin-composite rods were obtained from each group, and μTBS testing was done. The fracture pattern was visually classified as an adhesive failure at the interface, cohesive failure in composite, or dentin. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was done for two samples from each group. Statistical analysis was done using the Student's unpaired \"t\" and ANOVA test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group II showed a statistically significant reduction in μTBS in comparison to Group I. This was overcome in Groups III and IV. Hesperidin showed marginally better results than GSE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of GSE and hesperidin increases the μTBS of composite resin to dentin postcontamination with blood and ViscoStat Clear with Single Bond Universal Adhesive.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 4","pages":"466-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_312_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cavity preparation often causes gingival bleeding which can be controlled by hemostatic agents (HAs). These along with blood act as contaminants and hamper the bonding mechanism. Collagen cross-linkers (CCLs) are agents known to increase the bond strength (BS) to dentin. Hence, the purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of two different CCLs, proanthocyanidin (grape seed extract [GSE]) and hesperidin on the microtensile BS (μTBS) of a self-etch adhesive (SEA) system to dentin which was contaminated with blood and a HA.

Materials and methods: Thirty-six extracted human molars were collected, and their occlusal surfaces were sectioned to expose the dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups: Group I - Control, Group II - Contamination with blood and HA, Group III - Application of GSE after contamination, and Group IV - Application of hesperidin extract after contamination. The SEA was applied, followed by the use of a nanocomposite. Dentin-composite rods were obtained from each group, and μTBS testing was done. The fracture pattern was visually classified as an adhesive failure at the interface, cohesive failure in composite, or dentin. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was done for two samples from each group. Statistical analysis was done using the Student's unpaired "t" and ANOVA test.

Results: Group II showed a statistically significant reduction in μTBS in comparison to Group I. This was overcome in Groups III and IV. Hesperidin showed marginally better results than GSE.

Conclusions: The use of GSE and hesperidin increases the μTBS of composite resin to dentin postcontamination with blood and ViscoStat Clear with Single Bond Universal Adhesive.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

两种天然胶原交联剂对血液和止血剂污染后自蚀刻粘合剂系统与牙本质的微拉伸结合强度影响的比较评估:一项体外研究。
背景:口腔预备经常引起牙龈出血,止血剂可以控制牙龈出血。这些物质与血液一起作为污染物,阻碍了结合机制。胶原交联剂(CCLs)是已知的能增加与牙本质的结合强度(BS)的试剂。因此,本体外研究的目的是确定两种不同的CCL,原花青素(葡萄籽提取物[GSE])和橙皮苷对自蚀刻粘合剂(SEA)系统对被血液和HA污染的牙本质的微拉伸BS(μTBS)的影响。材料和方法:收集36颗提取的人类磨牙,并对其咬合表面进行切片以暴露牙本质。将牙齿随机分为四组:第一组-对照组,第二组-血液和HA污染组,第三组-污染后应用GSE,第四组-污染前应用橙皮苷提取物。应用SEA,然后使用纳米复合材料。从每组中获得Dentin复合材料棒,并进行μTBS测试。断裂模式可视为界面处的粘合失效、复合材料中的内聚失效或牙本质。对每组的两个样品进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析。使用Student的非配对“t”和ANOVA检验进行统计分析。结果:与第一组相比,第二组的μTBS在统计学上显著降低。第三组和第四组克服了这一点。橙皮苷的效果略好于GSE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信