Minimally Invasive Transverse Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy (MITO) for Hallux Valgus Correction: Early Outcomes of Mild to Moderate vs Severe Deformities.
Yeo Kwon Yoon, Zhi Hao Tang, Dong Woo Shim, Hyeong-Jun Rhyu, Seung Hwan Han, Jin Woo Lee, Kwang Hwan Park
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Transverse Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy (MITO) for Hallux Valgus Correction: Early Outcomes of Mild to Moderate vs Severe Deformities.","authors":"Yeo Kwon Yoon, Zhi Hao Tang, Dong Woo Shim, Hyeong-Jun Rhyu, Seung Hwan Han, Jin Woo Lee, Kwang Hwan Park","doi":"10.1177/10711007231185330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We compared the radiological and clinical outcomes of mild to moderate and severe hallux valgus (HV) treated with minimally invasive distal metatarsal transverse osteotomy (MITO) performed by a single surgeon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-four patients who underwent MITO between May 2018 and March 2020 were recruited and followed for at least 24 months. The severe group was defined as having a preoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) >40 degrees or preoperative first-to-second intermetatarsal angle (1-2 IMA) >16 degrees; the mild to moderate group was defined as having an HVA <40 degrees and a 1-2 IMA <16 degrees. Pre- and postoperative measurements of the HVA, 1-2 IMA, distal metatarsal articular angle, and tibial sesamoid position were obtained. The visual analog scale for pain, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey-36 physical component summary were used to assess clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 116 feet were included in this study and median follow-up period of 29.0 months (range, 24-52 months). Both groups showed significant improvements in all radiologic parameters postoperatively, with the degrees of correction greater in the severe group than in the mild to moderate group. All clinical scores improved significantly from the preoperative to the last follow-up visit. Final clinical outcomes and degrees of improvement were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that short-term radiographic results for patients with either mild to moderate or severe HV treated with MITO were favorable. Overall clinical outcomes were comparable to those of conventional treatments. In this series, we found MITO with screw fixation to be a satisfactory surgical option for patients with mild to severe HV deformities.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12446,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle International","volume":" ","pages":"992-1002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007231185330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We compared the radiological and clinical outcomes of mild to moderate and severe hallux valgus (HV) treated with minimally invasive distal metatarsal transverse osteotomy (MITO) performed by a single surgeon.
Methods: Eighty-four patients who underwent MITO between May 2018 and March 2020 were recruited and followed for at least 24 months. The severe group was defined as having a preoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) >40 degrees or preoperative first-to-second intermetatarsal angle (1-2 IMA) >16 degrees; the mild to moderate group was defined as having an HVA <40 degrees and a 1-2 IMA <16 degrees. Pre- and postoperative measurements of the HVA, 1-2 IMA, distal metatarsal articular angle, and tibial sesamoid position were obtained. The visual analog scale for pain, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey-36 physical component summary were used to assess clinical outcomes.
Results: A total of 116 feet were included in this study and median follow-up period of 29.0 months (range, 24-52 months). Both groups showed significant improvements in all radiologic parameters postoperatively, with the degrees of correction greater in the severe group than in the mild to moderate group. All clinical scores improved significantly from the preoperative to the last follow-up visit. Final clinical outcomes and degrees of improvement were comparable in both groups.
Conclusion: This study showed that short-term radiographic results for patients with either mild to moderate or severe HV treated with MITO were favorable. Overall clinical outcomes were comparable to those of conventional treatments. In this series, we found MITO with screw fixation to be a satisfactory surgical option for patients with mild to severe HV deformities.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
期刊介绍:
Foot & Ankle International (FAI), in publication since 1980, is the official journal of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS). This monthly medical journal emphasizes surgical and medical management as it relates to the foot and ankle with a specific focus on reconstructive, trauma, and sports-related conditions utilizing the latest technological advances. FAI offers original, clinically oriented, peer-reviewed research articles presenting new approaches to foot and ankle pathology and treatment, current case reviews, and technique tips addressing the management of complex problems. This journal is an ideal resource for highly-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists and allied health care providers.
The journal’s Founding Editor, Melvin H. Jahss, MD (deceased), served from 1980-1988. He was followed by Kenneth A. Johnson, MD (deceased) from 1988-1993; Lowell D. Lutter, MD (deceased) from 1993-2004; and E. Greer Richardson, MD from 2005-2007. David B. Thordarson, MD, assumed the role of Editor-in-Chief in 2008.
The journal focuses on the following areas of interest:
• Surgery
• Wound care
• Bone healing
• Pain management
• In-office orthotic systems
• Diabetes
• Sports medicine