{"title":"Stochastic curtailment tests for phase II trial with time-to-event outcome using the concept of relative time in the case of non-proportional hazards.","authors":"Palash Sharma, Milind A Phadnis","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2023.2244056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of the drug development process, interim analysis is frequently used to design efficient phase II clinical trials. A stochastic curtailment framework is often deployed wherein a decision to continue or curtail the trial is taken at each interim look based on the likelihood of observing a positive or negative treatment effect if the trial were to continue to its anticipated end. Thus, curtailment can take place due to evidence of early efficacy or futility. Traditionally, in the case of time-to-event endpoints, interim monitoring is conducted in a two-arm clinical trial using the log-rank test, often with the assumption of proportional hazards. However, when this is violated, the log-rank test may not be appropriate, resulting in loss of power and subsequently inaccurate sample sizes. In this paper, we propose stochastic curtailment methods for two-arm phase II trial with the flexibility to allow non-proportional hazards. The proposed methods are built utilizing the concept of relative time assuming that the survival times in the two treatment arms follow two different Weibull distributions. Three methods - conditional power, predictive power and Bayesian predictive probability - are discussed along with corresponding sample size calculations. The monitoring strategy is discussed with a real-life example.</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"596-611"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2023.2244056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As part of the drug development process, interim analysis is frequently used to design efficient phase II clinical trials. A stochastic curtailment framework is often deployed wherein a decision to continue or curtail the trial is taken at each interim look based on the likelihood of observing a positive or negative treatment effect if the trial were to continue to its anticipated end. Thus, curtailment can take place due to evidence of early efficacy or futility. Traditionally, in the case of time-to-event endpoints, interim monitoring is conducted in a two-arm clinical trial using the log-rank test, often with the assumption of proportional hazards. However, when this is violated, the log-rank test may not be appropriate, resulting in loss of power and subsequently inaccurate sample sizes. In this paper, we propose stochastic curtailment methods for two-arm phase II trial with the flexibility to allow non-proportional hazards. The proposed methods are built utilizing the concept of relative time assuming that the survival times in the two treatment arms follow two different Weibull distributions. Three methods - conditional power, predictive power and Bayesian predictive probability - are discussed along with corresponding sample size calculations. The monitoring strategy is discussed with a real-life example.
作为药物开发过程的一部分,中期分析常用于设计高效的二期临床试验。通常采用随机缩减框架,即在每次中期观察时,根据如果试验继续进行到预期终点,观察到积极或消极治疗效果的可能性,决定继续或缩减试验。因此,可以根据早期疗效或无效的证据来决定是否缩短试验时间。传统上,在时间到事件终点的情况下,双臂临床试验的中期监测采用对数秩检验,通常使用比例危险假定。然而,如果违反了这一假设,对数秩检验可能就不合适了,会导致功率损失,进而导致样本量不准确。在本文中,我们提出了适用于双臂 II 期试验的随机缩减方法,该方法具有允许非比例危险的灵活性。假设两个治疗臂的生存时间遵循两个不同的 Weibull 分布,提出的方法利用相对时间的概念。讨论了三种方法--条件功率、预测功率和贝叶斯预测概率--以及相应的样本量计算。通过一个真实的例子讨论了监测策略。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers:
Drug, device, and biological research and development;
Drug screening and drug design;
Assessment of pharmacological activity;
Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up;
Preclinical safety assessment;
Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics;
Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs;
Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety;
Postmarketing surveillance;
Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.