Are Palliative Care Volunteers Special People? A Comparative Observational Study Exploring Their Sociodemographic Profile and Psychological Resources.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Caroline Varay, Olivier Lareyre, Carolina Baeza-Velasco
{"title":"Are Palliative Care Volunteers Special People? A Comparative Observational Study Exploring Their Sociodemographic Profile and Psychological Resources.","authors":"Caroline Varay, Olivier Lareyre, Carolina Baeza-Velasco","doi":"10.1177/10499091231194036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faced with rising needs for patient support, palliative care is shifting towards a more community-based approach. Yet the profile of volunteers in this field is poorly known.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore psychosocial characteristics of palliative care volunteers, by comparing them to two groups, volunteers from the health and social sector without contact with palliative patients, and people from the general population without volunteer activity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational comparative study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The 3 groups of participants were recruited in France between September 2020 and June 2021. They completed an online survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics and psychological resources (self-efficacy, hope, optimism, resilience, mindfulness, self-compassion, empathy, forgivingness, and gratitude).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 559 participants were analyzed. Palliative care volunteers had overall significantly higher levels of psychological resources than control groups. Multivariate analysis revealed, among sociodemographic and psychological characteristics that showed differences between groups at the univariate level, the most efficient predictors of group status. The best criteria to distinguish palliative care volunteers from health and social sector volunteers were older age, having received training, and lower levels of self-compassion. To distinguish palliative care volunteers from people with no volunteer activity, older age and non-active professional status were the best criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative care volunteers displayed more psychological resources than controls. However, older age and being trained for volunteering, emerged as stronger factors for distinguishing palliative care volunteers from controls. Pursuing research about these volunteers should facilitate recruitment, training, and retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"754-761"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231194036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Faced with rising needs for patient support, palliative care is shifting towards a more community-based approach. Yet the profile of volunteers in this field is poorly known.

Aim: To explore psychosocial characteristics of palliative care volunteers, by comparing them to two groups, volunteers from the health and social sector without contact with palliative patients, and people from the general population without volunteer activity.

Design: Observational comparative study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis.

Participants: The 3 groups of participants were recruited in France between September 2020 and June 2021. They completed an online survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics and psychological resources (self-efficacy, hope, optimism, resilience, mindfulness, self-compassion, empathy, forgivingness, and gratitude).

Results: Data from 559 participants were analyzed. Palliative care volunteers had overall significantly higher levels of psychological resources than control groups. Multivariate analysis revealed, among sociodemographic and psychological characteristics that showed differences between groups at the univariate level, the most efficient predictors of group status. The best criteria to distinguish palliative care volunteers from health and social sector volunteers were older age, having received training, and lower levels of self-compassion. To distinguish palliative care volunteers from people with no volunteer activity, older age and non-active professional status were the best criteria.

Conclusions: Palliative care volunteers displayed more psychological resources than controls. However, older age and being trained for volunteering, emerged as stronger factors for distinguishing palliative care volunteers from controls. Pursuing research about these volunteers should facilitate recruitment, training, and retention.

姑息关怀志愿者是特殊人群吗?探索他们的社会人口概况和心理资源的比较观察研究。
背景:面对日益增长的病人支持需求,姑息关怀正转向更加以社区为基础的方式。目的:通过将姑息关怀志愿者与两类人进行比较,即与姑息关怀病人没有接触的卫生和社会部门的志愿者,以及没有参加过志愿者活动的普通人群,来探讨姑息关怀志愿者的社会心理特征:观察比较研究。数据分析采用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析:三组参与者于 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 6 月期间在法国招募。他们完成了一项在线调查,评估社会人口学特征和心理资源(自我效能、希望、乐观、复原力、正念、自我同情、同理心、宽容和感恩):对 559 名参与者的数据进行了分析。姑息关怀志愿者的心理资源水平总体上明显高于对照组。多变量分析显示,在社会人口学和心理特征中,单变量水平显示出的组间差异,是最有效的组间状态预测因素。区分姑息关怀志愿者与卫生和社会部门志愿者的最佳标准是年龄较大、接受过培训以及自我同情水平较低。要将姑息关怀志愿者与没有志愿活动的人区分开来,年龄较大和非活跃专业身份是最好的标准:结论:姑息关怀志愿者比对照组拥有更多的心理资源。然而,年龄较大和接受过志愿服务培训是区分姑息关怀志愿者和对照组志愿者的更有力因素。对这些志愿者的研究应有助于招募、培训和留住他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信