Inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding in Bangladesh: an estimation of relative and absolute measures of inequality.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Satyajit Kundu, Syed Sharaf Ahmed Chowdhury, Md Tamzid Hasan, Azaz Bin Sharif
{"title":"Inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding in Bangladesh: an estimation of relative and absolute measures of inequality.","authors":"Satyajit Kundu, Syed Sharaf Ahmed Chowdhury, Md Tamzid Hasan, Azaz Bin Sharif","doi":"10.1186/s13006-023-00584-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggested that inequalities based on education, wealth status, place of residence, and geographical regions significantly influence the key breastfeeding indicators including early initiation of breastfeeding. This study aimed to estimate the trends and magnitude of inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding practice in Bangladesh from 2004 to 2017 applying both absolute and relative measures of inequality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the last five Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey (BDHS) from 2004 to 2017 to measure the inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding practice using the WHO's Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) software. Following summary measures were estimated to measure the inequalities: Population Attributable Risk (PAR), Population Attributable Fraction (PAF), Difference (D), and Ratio (R) where the equity dimensions were wealth status, education level, sex of child, place of residence, and subnational regions (divisions). For each measure, point estimates along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An uprising pattern in the prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding was found, where early initiation of breastfeeding increased from 24.9% to 2004 to 59.0% in 2017. We found significant wealth-driven inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding practice in every wave of survey favoring the poorest wealth quintile (in 2017, D -10.5; 95% CI -16.6 to -4.3). We also identified geographical disparities in early initiation of breastfeeding practice (in 2017, PAF 11.1; 95% CI 2.2 to 19.9) favoring the Rangpur (65.5%), and Sylhet (65.3%) divisions. Education-related disparities were observed in 2004 only, but not in later survey years, which was due to a much lower level of adherence among those with secondary or higher education. There were no significant disparities in early initiation of breastfeeding based on the urban vs. rural residence and sex of the child.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest attention should be placed in Bangladesh to attain the WHO's 100% recommendation of timely initiation of breastfeeding. This study emphasizes on addressing the existing socioeconomic and geographic inequalities. Awareness-raising outreach programs focusing the mothers from wealthier sub-groups and divisions with lower prevalence should be planned and implemented by the joint effort of the government and non-government organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463657/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-023-00584-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggested that inequalities based on education, wealth status, place of residence, and geographical regions significantly influence the key breastfeeding indicators including early initiation of breastfeeding. This study aimed to estimate the trends and magnitude of inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding practice in Bangladesh from 2004 to 2017 applying both absolute and relative measures of inequality.

Methods: We used data from the last five Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey (BDHS) from 2004 to 2017 to measure the inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding practice using the WHO's Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) software. Following summary measures were estimated to measure the inequalities: Population Attributable Risk (PAR), Population Attributable Fraction (PAF), Difference (D), and Ratio (R) where the equity dimensions were wealth status, education level, sex of child, place of residence, and subnational regions (divisions). For each measure, point estimates along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported.

Results: An uprising pattern in the prevalence of early initiation of breastfeeding was found, where early initiation of breastfeeding increased from 24.9% to 2004 to 59.0% in 2017. We found significant wealth-driven inequalities in early initiation of breastfeeding practice in every wave of survey favoring the poorest wealth quintile (in 2017, D -10.5; 95% CI -16.6 to -4.3). We also identified geographical disparities in early initiation of breastfeeding practice (in 2017, PAF 11.1; 95% CI 2.2 to 19.9) favoring the Rangpur (65.5%), and Sylhet (65.3%) divisions. Education-related disparities were observed in 2004 only, but not in later survey years, which was due to a much lower level of adherence among those with secondary or higher education. There were no significant disparities in early initiation of breastfeeding based on the urban vs. rural residence and sex of the child.

Conclusions: The highest attention should be placed in Bangladesh to attain the WHO's 100% recommendation of timely initiation of breastfeeding. This study emphasizes on addressing the existing socioeconomic and geographic inequalities. Awareness-raising outreach programs focusing the mothers from wealthier sub-groups and divisions with lower prevalence should be planned and implemented by the joint effort of the government and non-government organizations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

孟加拉国早期开始母乳喂养的不平等:对不平等的相对和绝对衡量标准的估计。
背景:有证据表明,基于教育、财富状况、居住地和地理区域的不平等显著影响包括早期开始母乳喂养在内的关键母乳喂养指标。本研究旨在应用绝对和相对不平等指标,估计2004年至2017年孟加拉国早期开始母乳喂养实践的不平等趋势和程度。方法:我们使用2004年至2017年最近五次孟加拉国人口健康调查(BDHS)的数据,使用世卫组织健康公平评估工具包(HEAT)软件衡量早期开始母乳喂养实践的不平等。估计了以下总结措施来衡量不平等:人口归因风险(PAR),人口归因分数(PAF),差异(D)和比率(R),其中公平维度是财富状况,教育水平,儿童性别,居住地和次国家地区(部门)。对于每个测量,报告了点估计和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:早期开始母乳喂养的患病率呈上升趋势,从2004年的24.9%上升到2017年的59.0%。我们发现,在每一波有利于最贫穷的五分之一人群的调查中,早期开始母乳喂养实践的财富驱动的显著不平等(2017年,D -10.5;95% CI -16.6至-4.3)。我们还发现了早期开始母乳喂养实践的地域差异(2017年,PAF 11.1;95% CI 2.2 - 19.9)支持Rangpur区(65.5%)和Sylhet区(65.3%)。与教育相关的差异只在2004年被观察到,但在后来的调查中没有被观察到,这是由于受过中等或高等教育的人的坚持程度要低得多。在早期开始母乳喂养方面,城乡居民和儿童性别没有显著差异。结论:应高度重视孟加拉国,以实现世卫组织100%的及时开始母乳喂养的建议。本研究强调解决现有的社会经济和地理不平等。应由政府和非政府组织共同规划和实施以来自较富裕的子群体和发病率较低的部门的母亲为重点的提高认识的外展方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信