Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea.

Sungwoo Jung, Jin Ho Lee, Hyung Soon Lee
{"title":"Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea.","authors":"Sungwoo Jung,&nbsp;Jin Ho Lee,&nbsp;Hyung Soon Lee","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic hernia repair has increased in popularity since the introduction of da Vinci robots (Intuitive Surgical). However, we lack quantitative analyses of its potential benefits. Herein, we report our initial experience with robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the data from patients who underwent R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair with a prosthetic mesh using the da Vinci platform. Data on patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients (including 20 male patients [95.2%]) with a mean age of 54.1 ±16.4 years and body mass index of 23.8 ± 1.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> underwent R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Bilateral hernia repair was performed in two patients (9.5%), and six patients (28.5%) with scrotal hernia underwent R-TAPP hernia repair. A sigmoid colon sliding hernia was present in three patients (14.3%). The mean operation and console times were 91.8 ± 20.4 minutes and 154.5 ± 26.2 minutes, and 61.4 ± 16.9 minutes and 128.0 ± 25.5 minutes for unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia, respectively. Spermatic vessel injury was identified intraoperatively in one patient. Two minor postoperative complications, postoperative ileus, and wound seroma were reported. The mean duration of hospitalization was 3.8 ± 0.9 days. No recurrence or conversion to open surgery was required.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible. Its cost-effectiveness, optimal procedural steps, and indications for a robotic approach require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/b2/jmis-26-3-128.PMC10505366.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Robotic hernia repair has increased in popularity since the introduction of da Vinci robots (Intuitive Surgical). However, we lack quantitative analyses of its potential benefits. Herein, we report our initial experience with robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data from patients who underwent R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair with a prosthetic mesh using the da Vinci platform. Data on patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were also collected.

Results: Twenty-one patients (including 20 male patients [95.2%]) with a mean age of 54.1 ±16.4 years and body mass index of 23.8 ± 1.9 kg/m2 underwent R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Bilateral hernia repair was performed in two patients (9.5%), and six patients (28.5%) with scrotal hernia underwent R-TAPP hernia repair. A sigmoid colon sliding hernia was present in three patients (14.3%). The mean operation and console times were 91.8 ± 20.4 minutes and 154.5 ± 26.2 minutes, and 61.4 ± 16.9 minutes and 128.0 ± 25.5 minutes for unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia, respectively. Spermatic vessel injury was identified intraoperatively in one patient. Two minor postoperative complications, postoperative ileus, and wound seroma were reported. The mean duration of hospitalization was 3.8 ± 0.9 days. No recurrence or conversion to open surgery was required.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that R-TAPP inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible. Its cost-effectiveness, optimal procedural steps, and indications for a robotic approach require further investigation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的早期结果:韩国一项回顾性单机构研究。
目的:自从达芬奇机器人(Intuitive Surgical)问世以来,机器人疝气修补术越来越受欢迎。然而,我们缺乏对其潜在好处的定量分析。在此,我们报告了机器人经腹腹膜前疝修补术(R-TAPP)的初步经验。方法:我们回顾性回顾了使用达芬奇平台进行R-TAPP腹股沟疝修复术的患者的数据。还收集了患者特征和手术结果的数据。结果:21例患者(其中男性20例[95.2%])行R-TAPP腹股沟疝修补术,平均年龄54.1±16.4岁,体重指数23.8±1.9 kg/m2。2例(9.5%)行双侧疝修补术,6例(28.5%)阴囊疝行R-TAPP疝修补术。乙状结肠滑动疝3例(14.3%)。单侧腹股沟疝和双侧腹股沟疝的平均手术时间分别为91.8±20.4分钟和154.5±26.2分钟,分别为61.4±16.9分钟和128.0±25.5分钟。术中发现1例患者精管损伤。术后2例轻微并发症,术后肠梗阻和伤口血肿。平均住院时间为3.8±0.9 d。无复发或需转开手术。结论:R-TAPP修补腹股沟疝是安全可行的。其成本效益、最佳程序步骤和机器人方法的适应症需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信