The (inter)visual politics of border security: Co-constituting gender and race through Frontex's Risk Analysis.

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Columba Achilleos-Sarll, Julia Sachseder, Saskia Stachowitsch
{"title":"The (inter)visual politics of border security: Co-constituting gender and race through Frontex's Risk Analysis.","authors":"Columba Achilleos-Sarll,&nbsp;Julia Sachseder,&nbsp;Saskia Stachowitsch","doi":"10.1177/09670106231182314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visuals, including photographs and data visualizations, play a crucial role in the politics of EU border security, both as an internal governance tool (e.g. in surveillance) and as an external means of communication/representation (e.g. in photojournalism). Combining scholarship on photographic representations of migration with literature on surveillance technologies and data visualizations, we argue that these visuals interact to reproduce gendered and racialized meanings of migration and border security. Using a feminist postcolonial lens, we develop an intervisual framework for studying how processes of gendering and racialization render subjects, practices and spaces knowable at the intersection between these visuals. We apply this framework to a case study of Frontex's Risk Analysis Reports (2010-2021) and demonstrate how it is applicable to other security institutions. The intervisual analysis reveals how the migrant Other and (white) European are visually reproduced through: 1) the (in)visibilization of bodies; 2) the ascription and denial of agency; and 3) the spatialization of borders as 'frontier imaginings' that oscillate between fortification and expansionism. The intersectional co-constitution of gender and race, we conclude, is central to the visual politics of Frontex, contributing to problematizing migrants and migration and legitimizing violent border practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":21670,"journal":{"name":"Security Dialogue","volume":"54 4","pages":"374-394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106231182314","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visuals, including photographs and data visualizations, play a crucial role in the politics of EU border security, both as an internal governance tool (e.g. in surveillance) and as an external means of communication/representation (e.g. in photojournalism). Combining scholarship on photographic representations of migration with literature on surveillance technologies and data visualizations, we argue that these visuals interact to reproduce gendered and racialized meanings of migration and border security. Using a feminist postcolonial lens, we develop an intervisual framework for studying how processes of gendering and racialization render subjects, practices and spaces knowable at the intersection between these visuals. We apply this framework to a case study of Frontex's Risk Analysis Reports (2010-2021) and demonstrate how it is applicable to other security institutions. The intervisual analysis reveals how the migrant Other and (white) European are visually reproduced through: 1) the (in)visibilization of bodies; 2) the ascription and denial of agency; and 3) the spatialization of borders as 'frontier imaginings' that oscillate between fortification and expansionism. The intersectional co-constitution of gender and race, we conclude, is central to the visual politics of Frontex, contributing to problematizing migrants and migration and legitimizing violent border practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

边境安全的(间)视觉政治:通过Frontex的风险分析共同构成性别和种族。
视觉,包括照片和数据可视化,在欧盟边境安全政治中发挥着至关重要的作用,既可以作为内部治理工具(例如在监视中),也可以作为沟通/表现的外部手段(例如在新闻摄影中)。将移民的摄影表现与监控技术和数据可视化文献相结合,我们认为这些视觉效果相互作用,再现了移民和边境安全的性别和种族化意义。使用女权主义后殖民镜头,我们开发了一个视觉框架,用于研究性别化和种族化的过程如何在这些视觉效果的交叉点上呈现主体、实践和空间。我们将这一框架应用于Frontex风险分析报告(2010-2021)的案例研究,并展示了它如何适用于其他安全机构。访谈分析揭示了移民他者和(白人)欧洲人是如何通过以下方式在视觉上再现的:1)身体的视觉化;(二)代理的归属与否认;3)边界的空间化是在防御和扩张主义之间摇摆的“边界想象”。我们得出的结论是,性别和种族的交叉共同构成是Frontex视觉政治的核心,它助长了移民和移民的问题化,并使边境暴力行为合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Security Dialogue
Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信