Online Self-Triage of Ear or Hearing Concerns in a Patient Portal: Comparison of Subsequent Diagnoses and Hospitalizations to National Emergency Department and National Ambulatory Ear or Hearing Visits.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Frederick North, Teresa B Jensen, Jennifer Pecina, Nathaniel E Miller, Michelle Duvall, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Brenda J Johnson, Brian A Crum, Robert Stroebel
{"title":"Online Self-Triage of Ear or Hearing Concerns in a Patient Portal: Comparison of Subsequent Diagnoses and Hospitalizations to National Emergency Department and National Ambulatory Ear or Hearing Visits.","authors":"Frederick North,&nbsp;Teresa B Jensen,&nbsp;Jennifer Pecina,&nbsp;Nathaniel E Miller,&nbsp;Michelle Duvall,&nbsp;Elissa M Nelson,&nbsp;Matthew C Thompson,&nbsp;Brenda J Johnson,&nbsp;Brian A Crum,&nbsp;Robert Stroebel","doi":"10.1177/23333928231186209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although online self-triage is easily accessible, little is known about the patients who use self-triage or their subsequent diagnoses. We compared ear/hearing self-triage subsequent diagnoses to ear/hearing visit diagnoses in emergency departments (ED) and ambulatory clinics across the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD10) coded diagnoses following online self-triage for ear/hearing concerns with those from national ED and ambulatory clinic samples. We used data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) for comparison. Using matched ear/hearing diagnostic categories for those aged 1 and over, we compared self-triage diagnosis frequencies with national ED and ambulatory diagnosis frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following ear/hearing self-triage, there were 1092 subsequent office visits with a primary diagnosis code. For five frequently diagnosed ear/hearing conditions (i.e., suppurative and nonsuppurative otitis media [OM], otalgia, otitis externa, and cerumen impaction), there was a strong correlation between diagnosis counts made following self-triage and estimated counts of national ED visit diagnoses (r = 0.94; CI 95% [0.37 to 0.99]; <i>p </i>= .016, adjusted r<sup>2</sup> = 0.85). Seven diagnoses were available to compare with the national ambulatory sample; correlation was r = 0.79; CI 95% [0.08 to 0.97]; <i>p </i>= .037, adjusted r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.54. For ages 1 and over, estimated hospital admissions from the national ED visits for ear/hearing were 0.76%, CI 95% [0.28-2.1%]; estimated total national ear/hearing ED visits were 7.5 million (for 4 years, 2016 through 2019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strong correlation of ear-related self-triage diagnoses with national ED diagnoses and the low hospitalization risk for these diagnoses suggests that there is an opportunity for self-triage of ear/hearing concerns to decrease ED visits for these symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"10 ","pages":"23333928231186209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/52/10.1177_23333928231186209.PMC10387706.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928231186209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Although online self-triage is easily accessible, little is known about the patients who use self-triage or their subsequent diagnoses. We compared ear/hearing self-triage subsequent diagnoses to ear/hearing visit diagnoses in emergency departments (ED) and ambulatory clinics across the United States.

Methods: We compared International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD10) coded diagnoses following online self-triage for ear/hearing concerns with those from national ED and ambulatory clinic samples. We used data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) for comparison. Using matched ear/hearing diagnostic categories for those aged 1 and over, we compared self-triage diagnosis frequencies with national ED and ambulatory diagnosis frequencies.

Results: Following ear/hearing self-triage, there were 1092 subsequent office visits with a primary diagnosis code. For five frequently diagnosed ear/hearing conditions (i.e., suppurative and nonsuppurative otitis media [OM], otalgia, otitis externa, and cerumen impaction), there was a strong correlation between diagnosis counts made following self-triage and estimated counts of national ED visit diagnoses (r = 0.94; CI 95% [0.37 to 0.99]; p = .016, adjusted r2 = 0.85). Seven diagnoses were available to compare with the national ambulatory sample; correlation was r = 0.79; CI 95% [0.08 to 0.97]; p = .037, adjusted r2 = 0.54. For ages 1 and over, estimated hospital admissions from the national ED visits for ear/hearing were 0.76%, CI 95% [0.28-2.1%]; estimated total national ear/hearing ED visits were 7.5 million (for 4 years, 2016 through 2019).

Conclusion: The strong correlation of ear-related self-triage diagnoses with national ED diagnoses and the low hospitalization risk for these diagnoses suggests that there is an opportunity for self-triage of ear/hearing concerns to decrease ED visits for these symptoms.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在患者门户网站上对耳部或听力问题进行在线自我分类:国家急诊科和国家门诊耳部或听力就诊的后续诊断和住院比较
背景:虽然网上自我分诊很容易获得,但对使用自我分诊的患者及其后续诊断知之甚少。我们比较了美国各地急诊科(ED)和门诊诊所的耳/听力自我分类后续诊断与耳/听力访问诊断。方法:我们将国际疾病分类第10版(ICD10)编码诊断与来自国家急诊科和门诊样本的耳/听力问题在线自我分类进行比较。我们使用疾病控制中心(CDC)全国医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)和全国门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)的数据进行比较。使用匹配的耳朵/听力诊断类别对1岁及以上的人,我们比较了自我分类诊断频率与国家急诊科和门诊诊断频率。结果:在耳部/听力自我分类后,有1092名患者进行了初步诊断。对于五种经常诊断的耳部/听力疾病(即化脓性和非化脓性中耳炎[OM]、耳痛、外耳炎和耵聍嵌塞),自我分类后的诊断计数与全国急诊科诊断的估计计数之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.94;CI 95% [0.37 ~ 0.99];p =。016,调整后r2 = 0.85)。有7例诊断可与全国门诊样本进行比较;相关系数r = 0.79;CI 95% [0.08 ~ 0.97];p =。037,调整后r2 = 0.54。在1岁及以上的人群中,因耳部/听力就诊的全国急诊科估计住院率为0.76%,CI为95% [0.28-2.1%];据估计,2016年至2019年的4年间,全国耳/听力ED访问量为750万人次。结论:耳部相关自我分类诊断与国家ED诊断的相关性强,且这些诊断的住院风险较低,表明耳部/听力问题的自我分类有机会减少这些症状的ED就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信