Risk and prognosis of secondary bladder cancer after post-operative radiotherapy for gynecological cancer.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Li Wen, Guansheng Zhong, Yingjiao Zhang, Miaochun Zhong
{"title":"Risk and prognosis of secondary bladder cancer after post-operative radiotherapy for gynecological cancer.","authors":"Li Wen,&nbsp;Guansheng Zhong,&nbsp;Yingjiao Zhang,&nbsp;Miaochun Zhong","doi":"10.17305/bjbms.2021.6338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the impacts of radiation therapy (RT) on the occurrence risk of secondary bladder cancer (SBC) and on the patients' survival outcome after being diagnosed with gynecological cancer (EC). The data was obtained from the SEER database between 1973 and 2015. Chi-squared test was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics among the different groups. Fine and Gray's competing risk model was used to assess the cumulative incidence and occurrence risk of SBC in GC survivors. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for survival analysis. A total of 123,476 GC patients were included, among which 31,847 (25.8%) patients received RT while 91629 (74.2%) patients did not. The cumulative incidence of SBC was 1.59% or 0.73% among patients who had received prior GC specific RT or not, respectively. All EBRT (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) =2.49, 95% CI [2.17-2.86]), brachytherapy (SIR =1.96, 95% CI [1.60-2.38]), and combinational RT modality groups (SIR =2.73, 95% CI [2.24-3.28]) had dramatically higher SBC incidence as compared to the US general population. Receiving EBRT (HR = 2.83, 95% CI [2.34-3.43]), brachytherapy (HR = 2.17, 95% CI [1.67-2.82]), and combinational RT modality (HR = 2.97, 95% CI [2.34-3.77]) were independent risk factors for SBC development. Survival detriment was observed in SBC patients who received RT after GC diagnosis, as compared to those who did not receive RT. In conclusion, patients who underwent RT after GC had an increased risk of developing bladder as a secondary primary cancer. A long-term surveillance for SBC occurrence is necessary for GC patients who have received prior RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9147,"journal":{"name":"Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences","volume":"22 3","pages":"471-480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9162740/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2021.6338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the impacts of radiation therapy (RT) on the occurrence risk of secondary bladder cancer (SBC) and on the patients' survival outcome after being diagnosed with gynecological cancer (EC). The data was obtained from the SEER database between 1973 and 2015. Chi-squared test was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics among the different groups. Fine and Gray's competing risk model was used to assess the cumulative incidence and occurrence risk of SBC in GC survivors. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for survival analysis. A total of 123,476 GC patients were included, among which 31,847 (25.8%) patients received RT while 91629 (74.2%) patients did not. The cumulative incidence of SBC was 1.59% or 0.73% among patients who had received prior GC specific RT or not, respectively. All EBRT (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) =2.49, 95% CI [2.17-2.86]), brachytherapy (SIR =1.96, 95% CI [1.60-2.38]), and combinational RT modality groups (SIR =2.73, 95% CI [2.24-3.28]) had dramatically higher SBC incidence as compared to the US general population. Receiving EBRT (HR = 2.83, 95% CI [2.34-3.43]), brachytherapy (HR = 2.17, 95% CI [1.67-2.82]), and combinational RT modality (HR = 2.97, 95% CI [2.34-3.77]) were independent risk factors for SBC development. Survival detriment was observed in SBC patients who received RT after GC diagnosis, as compared to those who did not receive RT. In conclusion, patients who underwent RT after GC had an increased risk of developing bladder as a secondary primary cancer. A long-term surveillance for SBC occurrence is necessary for GC patients who have received prior RT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

妇科肿瘤放疗后继发膀胱癌的风险及预后。
本研究旨在探讨放射治疗(RT)对继发性膀胱癌(SBC)发生风险的影响及对诊断为妇科癌(EC)患者生存结局的影响。数据来自1973年至2015年的SEER数据库。采用卡方检验比较各组患者的临床病理特征。采用Fine和Gray竞争风险模型评估胃癌幸存者SBC的累积发病率和发生风险。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。共纳入123476例GC患者,其中31847例(25.8%)患者接受了RT治疗,91629例(74.2%)患者未接受RT治疗。在既往接受过GC特异性RT或未接受过RT的患者中,SBC的累积发病率分别为1.59%和0.73%。与美国普通人群相比,所有EBRT(标准化发病率(SIR) =2.49, 95% CI[2.17-2.86])、近距离放疗(SIR =1.96, 95% CI[1.60-2.38])和联合放疗组(SIR =2.73, 95% CI[2.24-3.28])的SBC发病率均显著高于美国普通人群。接受EBRT (HR = 2.83, 95% CI[2.34-3.43])、近距离放疗(HR = 2.17, 95% CI[1.67-2.82])和联合放疗方式(HR = 2.97, 95% CI[2.34-3.77])是SBC发展的独立危险因素。与未接受RT的患者相比,GC诊断后接受RT的SBC患者的生存期受到损害。总之,GC后接受RT的患者发生膀胱癌继发性原发癌的风险增加。对于既往接受过放疗的胃癌患者,长期监测SBC的发生是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences
Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences (BJBMS) is an international, English-language, peer reviewed journal, publishing original articles from different disciplines of basic medical sciences. BJBMS welcomes original research and comprehensive reviews as well as short research communications in the field of biochemistry, genetics, immunology, microbiology, pathology, pharmacology, pharmaceutical sciences and physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信