COVID 19 prevention practice of patients with known chronic illness in Ethiopia: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Amare Zewdie, Ayenew Mose, Tadesse Sahle, Abebaw Wasie Kasahun, Elyas Melaku, Melkamu Aderajew Zemene
{"title":"COVID 19 prevention practice of patients with known chronic illness in Ethiopia: A systemic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Amare Zewdie,&nbsp;Ayenew Mose,&nbsp;Tadesse Sahle,&nbsp;Abebaw Wasie Kasahun,&nbsp;Elyas Melaku,&nbsp;Melkamu Aderajew Zemene","doi":"10.1177/26335565231176166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There were different studies done and found a highly variable level of COVID 19 prevention practice; however, there was no summarized evidence on the prevention practice of chronic disease patients in Ethiopia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the pooled prevalence of COVID 19 prevention practice and associated factors among chronic disease patients in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive literature was searched in international databases. A weighted inverse variance random effect model was used to estimate pooled prevalence. Cochrane Q-test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics were computed to assess heterogeneity among studies. Funnel plot and Eggers test were done to assess publication bias. Review manager software was used to identify determinants of COVID 19 prevention practice.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Overall, 437 articles were retrieved and finally 8 articles were included in this review. The pooled prevalence of good COVID 19 prevention practices was 44.02% (95%CI (35.98%-52.06%). Being rurally reside (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI (1.30-4.41)), having educational status of cannot read and write (AOR = 2.32, 95% CI (1.22-4.40)), and poor knowledge (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI (1.64-3.60)) positively associated with poor practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Good COVID 19 prevention practices of chronic disease patients in Ethiopia was low. Rural residence, educational status of cannot read and write and poor knowledge was positively associated with poor practice. Therefore, policymakers and program planners should target those high-risk groups in improving their awareness to enhance their practice specifically focusing on those who are rural reside and with low educational status.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"13 ","pages":"26335565231176166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/48/dd/10.1177_26335565231176166.PMC10184217.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565231176166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There were different studies done and found a highly variable level of COVID 19 prevention practice; however, there was no summarized evidence on the prevention practice of chronic disease patients in Ethiopia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the pooled prevalence of COVID 19 prevention practice and associated factors among chronic disease patients in Ethiopia.

Method: Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive literature was searched in international databases. A weighted inverse variance random effect model was used to estimate pooled prevalence. Cochrane Q-test and I2 statistics were computed to assess heterogeneity among studies. Funnel plot and Eggers test were done to assess publication bias. Review manager software was used to identify determinants of COVID 19 prevention practice.

Result: Overall, 437 articles were retrieved and finally 8 articles were included in this review. The pooled prevalence of good COVID 19 prevention practices was 44.02% (95%CI (35.98%-52.06%). Being rurally reside (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI (1.30-4.41)), having educational status of cannot read and write (AOR = 2.32, 95% CI (1.22-4.40)), and poor knowledge (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI (1.64-3.60)) positively associated with poor practice.

Conclusion: Good COVID 19 prevention practices of chronic disease patients in Ethiopia was low. Rural residence, educational status of cannot read and write and poor knowledge was positively associated with poor practice. Therefore, policymakers and program planners should target those high-risk groups in improving their awareness to enhance their practice specifically focusing on those who are rural reside and with low educational status.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚已知慢性病患者的COVID - 19预防实践:系统回顾和荟萃分析
导读:进行了不同的研究,发现COVID - 19预防措施的水平变化很大;然而,没有关于埃塞俄比亚慢性病患者预防做法的总结证据。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估埃塞俄比亚慢性病患者中COVID - 19预防措施的总流行率及其相关因素。方法:采用PRISMA指南进行系统评价和meta分析。在国际数据库中检索了综合文献。采用加权反方差随机效应模型估计合并患病率。计算Cochrane q检验和I2统计量来评估研究之间的异质性。采用漏斗图和Eggers检验评估发表偏倚。使用评审管理器软件识别COVID - 19预防实践的决定因素。结果:共检索到437篇文献,最终纳入8篇文献。良好预防措施的总患病率为44.02% (95%CI(35.98% ~ 52.06%))。居住在农村(AOR = 2.39, 95% CI(1.30-4.41))、教育程度为不会读写(AOR = 2.32, 95% CI(1.22-4.40))和知识贫乏(AOR = 2.43, 95% CI(1.64-3.60))与不良实践呈正相关。结论:埃塞俄比亚慢性病患者良好的COVID - 19预防措施较低。农村居住、文盲、知识贫乏与不良实践呈正相关。因此,政策制定者和项目规划者应该针对这些高危人群,提高他们的意识,加强他们的实践,特别是农村居民和低教育水平的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信