Timing and burden of persistent critical illnessin UK intensive care units: An observational cohort study.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
David A Harrison, Ben C Creagh-Brown, Kathryn M Rowan
{"title":"Timing and burden of persistent critical illnessin UK intensive care units: An observational cohort study.","authors":"David A Harrison,&nbsp;Ben C Creagh-Brown,&nbsp;Kathryn M Rowan","doi":"10.1177/17511437211047180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent critical illness is a recognisable clinical syndrome defined conceptually as when the patient's reason for being in the intensive care unit (ICU) is more related to their ongoing critical illness than their original reason for admission. Our objectives were: (1) to assess the day in ICU on which chronic factors (e.g., age, gender and comorbidities) were more predictive of survival than acute factors (e.g. admission diagnosis, physiological derangements) measured on the day of admission; (2) to assess the consistency of this finding across major patient subgroups and over time and (3) to compare case mix characteristics and outcomes for patients determined to develop persistent critical illness (based on ICU length of stay) with other patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational cohort study using a high-quality clinical database from the national clinical audit of adult critical care. 217 adult ICUs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 835,946 adult patients admitted to participating ICUs between 1 April 2009 and 31 March 2016. The main outcome measure was mortality at discharge from acute hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We fitted two statistical models ('chronic' and 'acute') and updated these based upon patients with an ICU length of stay of at least 1, 2, etc., up to 28 days. The discrimination of the chronic model first exceeded that of the acute model on day 11. Patients with longer stays (>10 days) comprised 9% of admissions but used 45% of ICU bed-days. After a mean ICU length of stay of 22 days and a subsequent 28 days in hospital, 30% died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent critical illness is commonly encountered in clinical practice and is associated with increased healthcare utilisation and adverse outcomes. Improvements in our understanding of the longer term outcomes and in the development of tools to aid prognostication are urgently required - for humane as well as health economic reasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 2","pages":"139-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227892/pdf/10.1177_17511437211047180.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437211047180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Persistent critical illness is a recognisable clinical syndrome defined conceptually as when the patient's reason for being in the intensive care unit (ICU) is more related to their ongoing critical illness than their original reason for admission. Our objectives were: (1) to assess the day in ICU on which chronic factors (e.g., age, gender and comorbidities) were more predictive of survival than acute factors (e.g. admission diagnosis, physiological derangements) measured on the day of admission; (2) to assess the consistency of this finding across major patient subgroups and over time and (3) to compare case mix characteristics and outcomes for patients determined to develop persistent critical illness (based on ICU length of stay) with other patients.

Methods: Observational cohort study using a high-quality clinical database from the national clinical audit of adult critical care. 217 adult ICUs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 835,946 adult patients admitted to participating ICUs between 1 April 2009 and 31 March 2016. The main outcome measure was mortality at discharge from acute hospital.

Results: We fitted two statistical models ('chronic' and 'acute') and updated these based upon patients with an ICU length of stay of at least 1, 2, etc., up to 28 days. The discrimination of the chronic model first exceeded that of the acute model on day 11. Patients with longer stays (>10 days) comprised 9% of admissions but used 45% of ICU bed-days. After a mean ICU length of stay of 22 days and a subsequent 28 days in hospital, 30% died.

Conclusions: Persistent critical illness is commonly encountered in clinical practice and is associated with increased healthcare utilisation and adverse outcomes. Improvements in our understanding of the longer term outcomes and in the development of tools to aid prognostication are urgently required - for humane as well as health economic reasons.

英国重症监护病房持续危重疾病的时间和负担:一项观察性队列研究。
背景:持续性危重疾病是一种可识别的临床综合征,概念上定义为患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)的原因与他们正在进行的危重疾病比他们最初的入院原因更相关。我们的目标是:(1)评估在ICU的哪一天,慢性因素(如年龄、性别和合并症)比入院当天测量的急性因素(如入院诊断、生理紊乱)更能预测生存;(2)评估这一发现在主要患者亚组和时间上的一致性;(3)比较确定为持续性危重疾病(基于ICU住院时间)的患者与其他患者的病例组合特征和结果。方法:观察性队列研究,使用来自成人重症监护国家临床审计的高质量临床数据库。在2009年4月1日至2016年3月31日期间,共有835,946名成年患者入住了英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的217名成人icu。主要结局指标为急性出院死亡率。结果:我们拟合了两个统计模型(“慢性”和“急性”),并根据在ICU住院时间至少为1天、2天等的患者更新了这些模型,最长可达28天。在第11天,慢性模型的辨析力首先超过急性模型。住院时间较长(>10天)的患者占入院人数的9%,但占ICU住院天数的45%。在ICU平均住院22天和随后住院28天后,30%的患者死亡。结论:持续性危重疾病在临床实践中经常遇到,并与医疗保健利用率和不良后果的增加有关。出于人道和健康经济的原因,迫切需要改进我们对长期结果的理解,并开发有助于预测的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信