A cross-sectional investigation of Leptospira at the wildlife-livestock interface in New Zealand.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Pub Date : 2023-09-06 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011624
Marie Moinet, Hedwich Oosterhof, Shahista Nisa, Neville Haack, David A Wilkinson, Danielle Aberdein, James C Russell, Emilie Vallée, Julie Collins-Emerson, Cord Heuer, Jackie Benschop
{"title":"A cross-sectional investigation of Leptospira at the wildlife-livestock interface in New Zealand.","authors":"Marie Moinet,&nbsp;Hedwich Oosterhof,&nbsp;Shahista Nisa,&nbsp;Neville Haack,&nbsp;David A Wilkinson,&nbsp;Danielle Aberdein,&nbsp;James C Russell,&nbsp;Emilie Vallée,&nbsp;Julie Collins-Emerson,&nbsp;Cord Heuer,&nbsp;Jackie Benschop","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0011624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been a recent upsurge in human cases of leptospirosis in New Zealand, with wildlife a suspected emerging source, but up-to-date knowledge on this topic is lacking. We conducted a cross-sectional study in two farm environments to estimate Leptospira seroprevalence in wildlife and sympatric livestock, PCR/culture prevalence in wildlife, and compare seroprevalence and prevalence between species, sex, and age groups. Traps targeting house mice (Mus musculus), black rats (Rattus rattus), hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) and brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) were set for 10 trap-nights in March-April 2017 on a dairy (A) and a beef and sheep (B) farm. Trapped wild animals and an age-stratified random sample of domestic animals, namely cattle, sheep and working dogs were blood sampled. Sera were tested by microagglutination test for five serogroups and titres compared using a Proportional Similarity Index (PSI). Wildlife kidneys were sampled for culture and qPCR targeting the lipL32 gene. True prevalence in mice was assessed using occupancy modelling by collating different laboratory results. Infection profiles varied by species, age group and farm. At the MAT cut-point of ≥ 48, up to 78% of wildlife species, and 16-99% of domestic animals were seropositive. Five of nine hedgehogs, 23/105 mice and 1/14 black rats reacted to L. borgpetersenii sv Ballum. The sera of 4/18 possums and 4/9 hedgehogs reacted to L. borgpetersenii sv Hardjobovis whilst 1/18 possums and 1/9 hedgehogs reacted to Tarassovi. In ruminants, seroprevalence for Hardjobovis and Pomona ranged 0-90% and 0-71% depending on the species and age group. Titres against Ballum, Tarassovi and Copenhageni were also observed in 4-20%, 0-25% and 0-21% of domestic species, respectively. The PSI indicated rodents and livestock had the most dissimilar serological responses. Three of nine hedgehogs, 31/105 mice and 2/14 rats were carrying leptospires (PCR and/or culture positive). True prevalence estimated by occupancy modelling in mice was 38% [95% Credible Interval 26, 51%] on Farm A and 22% [11, 40%] on Farm B. In the same environment, exposure to serovars found in wildlife species was commonly detected in livestock. Transmission pathways between and within species should be assessed to help in the development of efficient mitigation strategies against Leptospira.</p>","PeriodicalId":20260,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011624","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a recent upsurge in human cases of leptospirosis in New Zealand, with wildlife a suspected emerging source, but up-to-date knowledge on this topic is lacking. We conducted a cross-sectional study in two farm environments to estimate Leptospira seroprevalence in wildlife and sympatric livestock, PCR/culture prevalence in wildlife, and compare seroprevalence and prevalence between species, sex, and age groups. Traps targeting house mice (Mus musculus), black rats (Rattus rattus), hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) and brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) were set for 10 trap-nights in March-April 2017 on a dairy (A) and a beef and sheep (B) farm. Trapped wild animals and an age-stratified random sample of domestic animals, namely cattle, sheep and working dogs were blood sampled. Sera were tested by microagglutination test for five serogroups and titres compared using a Proportional Similarity Index (PSI). Wildlife kidneys were sampled for culture and qPCR targeting the lipL32 gene. True prevalence in mice was assessed using occupancy modelling by collating different laboratory results. Infection profiles varied by species, age group and farm. At the MAT cut-point of ≥ 48, up to 78% of wildlife species, and 16-99% of domestic animals were seropositive. Five of nine hedgehogs, 23/105 mice and 1/14 black rats reacted to L. borgpetersenii sv Ballum. The sera of 4/18 possums and 4/9 hedgehogs reacted to L. borgpetersenii sv Hardjobovis whilst 1/18 possums and 1/9 hedgehogs reacted to Tarassovi. In ruminants, seroprevalence for Hardjobovis and Pomona ranged 0-90% and 0-71% depending on the species and age group. Titres against Ballum, Tarassovi and Copenhageni were also observed in 4-20%, 0-25% and 0-21% of domestic species, respectively. The PSI indicated rodents and livestock had the most dissimilar serological responses. Three of nine hedgehogs, 31/105 mice and 2/14 rats were carrying leptospires (PCR and/or culture positive). True prevalence estimated by occupancy modelling in mice was 38% [95% Credible Interval 26, 51%] on Farm A and 22% [11, 40%] on Farm B. In the same environment, exposure to serovars found in wildlife species was commonly detected in livestock. Transmission pathways between and within species should be assessed to help in the development of efficient mitigation strategies against Leptospira.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新西兰野生动物与牲畜交界处钩端螺旋体的横断面调查。
最近,新西兰的人类钩端螺旋体病病例激增,野生动物被怀疑是新出现的来源,但缺乏有关这一主题的最新知识。我们在两个农场环境中进行了一项横断面研究,以估计野生动物和有症状牲畜的钩端螺旋体血清流行率、野生动物的PCR/培养流行率,并比较不同物种、性别和年龄组的血清流行率和流行率。2017年3月至4月,在一个奶牛场(a)和一个牛羊场(B)设置了针对家鼠(Mus musculus)、黑鼠(Rattus Rattus)、刺猬(Erinaceus europaeus)和刷尾负鼠(Trichosurus vulpecula)的10个陷阱之夜。对被捕获的野生动物和年龄分层的家畜(即牛、羊和工作犬)进行血液采样。通过微凝集试验检测五个血清组的血清,并使用比例相似指数(PSI)比较滴度。对野生动物肾脏进行取样,用于培养和靶向lipL32基因的qPCR。通过整理不同的实验室结果,使用占用模型评估小鼠的真实患病率。感染情况因物种、年龄组和农场而异。在MAT切割点≥48时,高达78%的野生动物和16-99%的家畜呈血清阳性。9只刺猬中有5只、23/105只小鼠和1/14只黑鼠对L.borgpetersenii sv Ballum有反应。4/18只负鼠和4/9只刺猬的血清对L.borgpetersenii sv Hardjobovis有反应,而1/18只负猴和1/9只刺猬对Tarassovi有反应。在反刍动物中,哈氏和波莫纳的血清流行率在0-90%和0-71%之间,具体取决于物种和年龄组。针对Ballum、Tarassovi和Copenhageni的滴度也分别在4-20%、0-25%和0-21%的国内物种中观察到。PSI表明啮齿动物和牲畜的血清学反应最为不同。9只刺猬中有3只、31/105只小鼠和2/14只大鼠携带钩端螺旋体(PCR和/或培养阳性)。通过小鼠入住模型估计的真实患病率在农场A为38%[95%可信区间26,51%],在农场B为22%[11,40%]。在相同的环境中,在牲畜中通常检测到接触野生动物中发现的血清变异株。应评估物种之间和物种内部的传播途径,以帮助制定针对钩端螺旋体的有效缓解策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信