Trauma and loss in the Adult Attachment Interview: Situating the unresolved state of mind classification in disciplinary and social context.

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Lianne Bakkum, Carlo Schuengel, Sarah L Foster, R M Pasco Fearon, Robbie Duschinsky
{"title":"Trauma and loss in the Adult Attachment Interview: Situating the unresolved state of mind classification in disciplinary and social context.","authors":"Lianne Bakkum,&nbsp;Carlo Schuengel,&nbsp;Sarah L Foster,&nbsp;R M Pasco Fearon,&nbsp;Robbie Duschinsky","doi":"10.1177/09526951221143645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines how 'trauma' has been conceptualised in the unresolved state of mind classification in the Adult Attachment Interview, introduced by Main and Hesse in 1990. The unresolved state of mind construct has been influential for three decades of research in developmental psychology. However, not much is known about how this measure of unresolved trauma was developed, and how it relates to other conceptualisations of trauma. We draw on previously unavailable manuscripts from Main and Hesse's personal archive, including various editions of unpublished coding manuals, and on Main-Bowlby correspondence from the John Bowlby Archive at the Wellcome Trust in London. This article traces the emergence of the unresolved state of mind classification, and examines the assumptions about trauma embedded in the construct. These assumptions are situated both in the immediate context of the work of Main and Hesse and in terms of wider discourses about trauma in the period. Our analysis considers how a particular form of trauma discourse entered into attachment research, and in doing so partly lost contact with wider disciplinary study of trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":50403,"journal":{"name":"History of the Human Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492659/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951221143645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines how 'trauma' has been conceptualised in the unresolved state of mind classification in the Adult Attachment Interview, introduced by Main and Hesse in 1990. The unresolved state of mind construct has been influential for three decades of research in developmental psychology. However, not much is known about how this measure of unresolved trauma was developed, and how it relates to other conceptualisations of trauma. We draw on previously unavailable manuscripts from Main and Hesse's personal archive, including various editions of unpublished coding manuals, and on Main-Bowlby correspondence from the John Bowlby Archive at the Wellcome Trust in London. This article traces the emergence of the unresolved state of mind classification, and examines the assumptions about trauma embedded in the construct. These assumptions are situated both in the immediate context of the work of Main and Hesse and in terms of wider discourses about trauma in the period. Our analysis considers how a particular form of trauma discourse entered into attachment research, and in doing so partly lost contact with wider disciplinary study of trauma.

成人依恋访谈中的创伤和损失:在学科和社会背景下定位未解决的心理状态分类。
本文探讨了“创伤”是如何在成人依恋访谈中未解决的心理状态分类中被概念化的,该分类由Main和Hesse于1990年引入。未解决的心理状态结构影响了发展心理学三十年的研究。然而,对于这种未解决创伤的测量方法是如何发展起来的,以及它与其他创伤概念的关系,人们知之甚少。我们从梅因和黑塞的个人档案中提取了以前无法获得的手稿,包括未出版的各种版本的编码手册,以及来自伦敦惠康信托基金会约翰·鲍尔比档案馆的梅因-鲍尔比通信。本文追溯了未解决的心理状态分类的出现,并检查了关于创伤的假设嵌入在这个结构中。这些假设既存在于梅因和黑塞作品的直接背景中,也存在于那个时期关于创伤的更广泛的论述中。我们的分析考虑了一种特殊形式的创伤话语是如何进入依恋研究的,并在此过程中部分地失去了与更广泛的创伤学科研究的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of the Human Sciences
History of the Human Sciences 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: History of the Human Sciences aims to expand our understanding of the human world through a broad interdisciplinary approach. The journal will bring you critical articles from sociology, psychology, anthropology and politics, and link their interests with those of philosophy, literary criticism, art history, linguistics, psychoanalysis, aesthetics and law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信