Diagnostic Accuracy of the Short Physical Performance Battery in Detecting Frailty and Prefrailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Results From the PRO-EVA Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-25 DOI:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000352
Rafaella Silva Dos Santos Aguiar Gonçalves, Karyna Myrelly Oliveira Bezerra de Figueiredo Ribeiro, Sabrina Gabrielle Gomes Fernandes, Luiz Eduardo Lima de Andrade, Maria das Graças de Araújo Lira, Rafaela Andrade do Nascimento, Mariana Carmem Apolinário Vieira, Álvaro Campos Cavalcanti Maciel
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of the Short Physical Performance Battery in Detecting Frailty and Prefrailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Results From the PRO-EVA Study.","authors":"Rafaella Silva Dos Santos Aguiar Gonçalves,&nbsp;Karyna Myrelly Oliveira Bezerra de Figueiredo Ribeiro,&nbsp;Sabrina Gabrielle Gomes Fernandes,&nbsp;Luiz Eduardo Lima de Andrade,&nbsp;Maria das Graças de Araújo Lira,&nbsp;Rafaela Andrade do Nascimento,&nbsp;Mariana Carmem Apolinário Vieira,&nbsp;Álvaro Campos Cavalcanti Maciel","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is widely used for older adults since it has a high level of validity, reliability, and responsiveness in measuring function in this population. However, only a few studies of diagnostic accuracy have assessed SPPB capacity in detecting frailty and prefrailty by estimating more detailed measurement properties. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the SPPB's diagnostic accuracy in detecting frailty and prefrailty, in addition to identifying cut-off points for walking time and chair stand time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study composed of 786 community-dwelling older adults 60 years or older, in which sociodemographic and anthropometric data, frailty phenotype, and total SPPB score, as well as walking time and chair stand time, were assessed. Analysis of a receiver operating characteristic curve was performed to identify the cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity in the total SPPB score, as well as the walking time and chair stand time for frailty and prefrailty screening. Accuracy and positive and negative predictive values were subsequently calculated.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The cut-off points identified for the total SPPB score, walking time, and chair stand time were 9 points or less (accuracy of 72.6%), 5 seconds or less, and 13 seconds or less, respectively, for frailty screening and 11 points or less (accuracy of 58.7%), 4 seconds or less, and 10 seconds or less, respectively, for prefrailty screening. The walking time showed greater frailty discriminatory capacity compared with the chair stand time (effect size = 1.24 vs 0.64; sensitivity = 69% vs 59%; and specificity = 84% vs 75%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The total SPPB score has good diagnostic accuracy to discriminate between nonfrail and frail older adults using a cut-off point of 9 or less, being better to identify the true negatives (older adults who are not frail). Although the SPPB's diagnostic accuracy measures for detecting prefrailty were low to moderate, this instrument can help in screening prefrail older adults from the cutoff point of 11 or less in the total SPPB score. Identification of prefrail older adults enables implementing early treatment in this target audience and can prevent their advance to frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and purpose: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is widely used for older adults since it has a high level of validity, reliability, and responsiveness in measuring function in this population. However, only a few studies of diagnostic accuracy have assessed SPPB capacity in detecting frailty and prefrailty by estimating more detailed measurement properties. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the SPPB's diagnostic accuracy in detecting frailty and prefrailty, in addition to identifying cut-off points for walking time and chair stand time.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study composed of 786 community-dwelling older adults 60 years or older, in which sociodemographic and anthropometric data, frailty phenotype, and total SPPB score, as well as walking time and chair stand time, were assessed. Analysis of a receiver operating characteristic curve was performed to identify the cut-off point, sensitivity, and specificity in the total SPPB score, as well as the walking time and chair stand time for frailty and prefrailty screening. Accuracy and positive and negative predictive values were subsequently calculated.

Results and discussion: The cut-off points identified for the total SPPB score, walking time, and chair stand time were 9 points or less (accuracy of 72.6%), 5 seconds or less, and 13 seconds or less, respectively, for frailty screening and 11 points or less (accuracy of 58.7%), 4 seconds or less, and 10 seconds or less, respectively, for prefrailty screening. The walking time showed greater frailty discriminatory capacity compared with the chair stand time (effect size = 1.24 vs 0.64; sensitivity = 69% vs 59%; and specificity = 84% vs 75%).

Conclusions: The total SPPB score has good diagnostic accuracy to discriminate between nonfrail and frail older adults using a cut-off point of 9 or less, being better to identify the true negatives (older adults who are not frail). Although the SPPB's diagnostic accuracy measures for detecting prefrailty were low to moderate, this instrument can help in screening prefrail older adults from the cutoff point of 11 or less in the total SPPB score. Identification of prefrail older adults enables implementing early treatment in this target audience and can prevent their advance to frailty.

短体力电池在检测社区居住老年人虚弱和疲劳方面的诊断准确性:PRO-EVA研究结果。
背景和目的:短期体能测试(SPPB)广泛用于老年人,因为它在测量老年人的功能方面具有较高的有效性、可靠性和响应性。然而,只有少数诊断准确性研究通过估计更详细的测量特性来评估SPPB检测虚弱和疲劳前期的能力。因此,本研究旨在评估SPPB在检测虚弱和疲劳前的诊断准确性,以及确定行走时间和椅子站立时间的分界点。方法:这是一项由786名60岁或以上居住在社区的老年人组成的横断面研究,其中评估了社会人口学和人体测量数据、虚弱表型、SPPB总分以及行走时间和椅子站立时间。对受试者操作特征曲线进行分析,以确定SPPB总分的临界点、敏感性和特异性,以及虚弱和运动前筛查的行走时间和椅子站立时间。随后计算准确度以及阳性和阴性预测值。结果和讨论:虚弱筛查的SPPB总分、行走时间和椅子站立时间的分界点分别为9分或以下(准确率72.6%)、5秒或以下和13秒或以下,而铁路前筛查的分界点则分别为11分或以上(准确率58.7%)、4秒或以下、10秒或以下。与椅子站立时间相比,行走时间显示出更大的虚弱辨别能力(效应大小=1.24 vs 0.64;敏感性=69%vs 59%;特异性=84%vs 75%)。结论:SPPB总分具有良好的诊断准确性,可以使用9或更低的分界点来区分不虚弱和虚弱的老年人,更好地识别真正的阴性(不虚弱的老年)。尽管SPPB检测飞行前的诊断准确度是低到中等的,但该仪器可以帮助从SPPB总分的11分或更低的临界点筛查飞行前的老年人。识别铁路前的老年人能够在这一目标人群中实施早期治疗,并可以防止他们发展为虚弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult. The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信