Knowledge and Use of Evidence-Based Programs for Older Adults in the Community: A Survey of Physical Therapy Professionals.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-10 DOI:10.1519/JPT.0000000000000359
Jennifer S Brach, Lori A Schrodt, Jennifer L Vincenzo, Subashan Perera, Colleen Hergott, Jennifer Sidelinker, Beth Rohrer, Jennifer Tripken, Tiffany E Shubert
{"title":"Knowledge and Use of Evidence-Based Programs for Older Adults in the Community: A Survey of Physical Therapy Professionals.","authors":"Jennifer S Brach, Lori A Schrodt, Jennifer L Vincenzo, Subashan Perera, Colleen Hergott, Jennifer Sidelinker, Beth Rohrer, Jennifer Tripken, Tiffany E Shubert","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality highlights the need for sustainable linkages between clinical and community settings to enhance prevention and improve care of people with chronic conditions. The first step in promoting linkages is understanding the knowledge and use of evidence-based programs by physical therapy (PT) professionals. Therefore, the objective of this study was to describe the knowledge of and referral to evidence-based programs in the community by a convenience sample of PT professionals and to examine the characteristics of those who refer to evidence-based programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional web-based survey containing 36 questions regarding respondents' demographics and evidence-based program knowledge and referral practices was disseminated to a convenience sample of PT professionals via email, news-blasts, social media, and word of mouth.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>A total of 459 PT professionals completed the survey. Approximately half reported practicing for more than 20 years and 75% are members of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). The majority (74%) are aware of evidence-based programs; however, fewer (56%) refer to these programs. Compared with individuals who do not refer to evidence-based programs, individuals who refer are more likely to be involved in PT organizations and be an APTA Geriatrics member. Of the individuals who do not refer to evidence-based programs, 21.5% reported not knowing they existed and 33% reported not knowing where the programs are located.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most survey respondents reported knowing about evidence-based programs and more than half reported being aware of the evidence-based programs available in their communities. These results indicate many PT professionals already have a knowledge of evidence-based programs to support clinic-community linkages. As survey respondents were a sample of convenience and likely do not represent all PT professionals in the United States, the results should be interpreted with caution. Additional research on a more representative sample is needed to fully understand the current utilization of evidence-based programs, which will enable us to design efforts to improve the clinic to community transition. Improving linkages between PT professionals and community resources has the potential to benefit both patients and clinicians and lessen the burden on the health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":"46 4","pages":"196-206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality highlights the need for sustainable linkages between clinical and community settings to enhance prevention and improve care of people with chronic conditions. The first step in promoting linkages is understanding the knowledge and use of evidence-based programs by physical therapy (PT) professionals. Therefore, the objective of this study was to describe the knowledge of and referral to evidence-based programs in the community by a convenience sample of PT professionals and to examine the characteristics of those who refer to evidence-based programs.

Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey containing 36 questions regarding respondents' demographics and evidence-based program knowledge and referral practices was disseminated to a convenience sample of PT professionals via email, news-blasts, social media, and word of mouth.

Results and discussion: A total of 459 PT professionals completed the survey. Approximately half reported practicing for more than 20 years and 75% are members of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA). The majority (74%) are aware of evidence-based programs; however, fewer (56%) refer to these programs. Compared with individuals who do not refer to evidence-based programs, individuals who refer are more likely to be involved in PT organizations and be an APTA Geriatrics member. Of the individuals who do not refer to evidence-based programs, 21.5% reported not knowing they existed and 33% reported not knowing where the programs are located.

Conclusions: Most survey respondents reported knowing about evidence-based programs and more than half reported being aware of the evidence-based programs available in their communities. These results indicate many PT professionals already have a knowledge of evidence-based programs to support clinic-community linkages. As survey respondents were a sample of convenience and likely do not represent all PT professionals in the United States, the results should be interpreted with caution. Additional research on a more representative sample is needed to fully understand the current utilization of evidence-based programs, which will enable us to design efforts to improve the clinic to community transition. Improving linkages between PT professionals and community resources has the potential to benefit both patients and clinicians and lessen the burden on the health care system.

社区老年人循证程序的知识和使用:对物理治疗专业人员的调查。
背景和目的:医疗保健研究与质量局强调,需要在临床和社区环境之间建立可持续的联系,以加强预防和改善对慢性病患者的护理。促进联系的第一步是了解物理治疗(PT)专业人员对循证计划的了解和使用。因此,本研究的目的是通过PT专业人员的便利样本描述社区中循证项目的知识和转介情况,并检查转介循证项目者的特征。方法:通过电子邮件、新闻发布会、社交媒体和口口相传,将一项包含36个关于受访者人口统计、循证项目知识和推荐实践的横断面网络调查分发给PT专业人员样本。结果和讨论:共有459名PT专业人员完成了调查。据报道,约有一半的人执业超过20年,75%的人是美国物理治疗协会(APTA)的成员。大多数人(74%)知道循证方案;然而,很少有人(56%)提到这些项目。与不参考循证项目的个人相比,参考的个人更有可能参与PT组织,并成为APTA老年医学成员。在没有参考循证项目的人中,21.5%的人表示不知道这些项目的存在,33%的人表示不知晓这些项目的位置。结论:大多数受访者表示了解循证项目,超过一半的受访者表示了解所在社区的循证项目。这些结果表明,许多PT专业人员已经掌握了支持诊所与社区联系的循证计划的知识。由于调查对象是一个方便的样本,可能并不代表美国所有PT专业人员,因此应谨慎解读结果。需要对更具代表性的样本进行额外的研究,以充分了解循证计划的当前使用情况,这将使我们能够设计改进诊所向社区过渡的努力。改善PT专业人员和社区资源之间的联系有可能使患者和临床医生都受益,并减轻医疗保健系统的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult. The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信