Construction of an enteral nutrition evaluation system for critically ill patients based on the Delphi method.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-15 DOI:10.4103/sjg.sjg_205_23
Yanrong Yao, Jingli Liu, Hongmei Xue, Xiaoyan Wang, Weijie Yao, Na Liu, Zuozheng Wang, Guangli Mi
{"title":"Construction of an enteral nutrition evaluation system for critically ill patients based on the Delphi method.","authors":"Yanrong Yao, Jingli Liu, Hongmei Xue, Xiaoyan Wang, Weijie Yao, Na Liu, Zuozheng Wang, Guangli Mi","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_205_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to construct an enteral nutrition evaluation system for critically ill patients using the Delphi method to direct the formulation of enteral nutrition support strategies and reduce interruption to enteral feeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used domestic and foreign databases to obtain and analyze the literature and form \"The Whole-Proceeding Enteral Nutrition Evaluation System for Critically Ill Patients.\" The Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of expert opinion consultation, combined with the suggestions from the research group to finalize the nutrition evaluation content of the system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After two rounds of expert consultation, a nutrition evaluation system was formed around three dimensions: before the start, during, and after the end of nutritional support. The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation were 90.0% (18/20) and 100.0% (18/18), respectively. Authority coefficients were 0.865 and 0.908, while Kendall coordination coefficients were 0.108 ( P < 0.05) and 0.115 ( P < 0.001), respectively. Finally, the full enteral nutrition evaluation system for critically ill patients was constructed based on the Delphi method, including three primary items and seven secondary and 28 tertiary indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The established \"Whole-Proceeding Enteral Nutrition Evaluation System for Critically Ill Patients\" has high consistency from expert opinions and reliability, which can provide a practical evaluation tool for the process of enteral nutrition for severe patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48881,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_205_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to construct an enteral nutrition evaluation system for critically ill patients using the Delphi method to direct the formulation of enteral nutrition support strategies and reduce interruption to enteral feeding.

Methods: We used domestic and foreign databases to obtain and analyze the literature and form "The Whole-Proceeding Enteral Nutrition Evaluation System for Critically Ill Patients." The Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of expert opinion consultation, combined with the suggestions from the research group to finalize the nutrition evaluation content of the system.

Results: After two rounds of expert consultation, a nutrition evaluation system was formed around three dimensions: before the start, during, and after the end of nutritional support. The effective recovery rates of the two rounds of expert consultation were 90.0% (18/20) and 100.0% (18/18), respectively. Authority coefficients were 0.865 and 0.908, while Kendall coordination coefficients were 0.108 ( P < 0.05) and 0.115 ( P < 0.001), respectively. Finally, the full enteral nutrition evaluation system for critically ill patients was constructed based on the Delphi method, including three primary items and seven secondary and 28 tertiary indicators.

Conclusion: The established "Whole-Proceeding Enteral Nutrition Evaluation System for Critically Ill Patients" has high consistency from expert opinions and reliability, which can provide a practical evaluation tool for the process of enteral nutrition for severe patients.

基于德尔菲法构建重症患者肠内营养评估系统。
背景:本研究旨在利用德尔菲法构建重症患者肠内营养评估系统,指导肠内营养支持策略的制定,减少肠内喂养的中断:本研究旨在利用德尔菲法构建重症患者肠内营养评价体系,指导肠内营养支持策略的制定,减少肠内喂养的中断:我们利用国内外数据库获取文献并进行分析,形成了 "重症患者全程肠内营养评价体系"。采用德尔菲法进行了两轮专家意见征询,结合课题组的建议,最终确定了该系统的营养评价内容:结果:经过两轮专家咨询,围绕营养支持开始前、营养支持过程中、营养支持结束后三个维度形成了营养评价体系。两轮专家会诊的有效恢复率分别为 90.0%(18/20)和 100.0%(18/18)。权威系数分别为 0.865 和 0.908,肯德尔协调系数分别为 0.108 ( P < 0.05) 和 0.115 ( P < 0.001)。最后,基于德尔菲法构建了重症患者全程肠内营养评价体系,包括3项一级指标、7项二级指标和28项三级指标:结论:所建立的 "重症患者全程肠内营养评价体系 "与专家意见具有较高的一致性和可靠性,可为重症患者肠内营养过程提供实用的评价工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (SJG) is an open access peer-reviewed publication. Authors are invited to submit articles in the field of gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition, with a wide spectrum of coverage including basic science, epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutics, public health, and standards of health care in relation to the concerned specialty. Review articles are usually by invitation. However review articles of current interest and a high standard of scientific value could also be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信